User talk:Redux/Archive08

PLEASE DO NOT EDIT. THIS IS AN ARCHIVE PAGE

FYI, RfC pending against you

FYI, since I am not sure you have been notified, there is an RfC pending against you at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Redux and Gallimh. I believe the RfC is meritless and have added an outside view accordingly. Newyorkbrad 22:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Brazil

I have suggested on the talk page to add assessment features to the project template, and there is one version that I've edited from the Portugal WP in my sandbox. I don't knowif it works or whether it should be added to the project. What do you think? Macgreco 02:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaillimh

Per your comment on user talk:Gaillimh about disclosing that user's previous identify to arbitrators/checkusers/et al, I would like to know that user's previous identity. You can reply using the email-this-user function. Raul654 05:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Reply to wikiwatch AT sbcglobal.net -- Daniel Brandt 68.91.89.40 00:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to confirm your identity as a registered user who also holds the status of Bureaucrat, CheckUser or Arbitrator. Otherwise I cannot release the information. Redux 00:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request, I have forwarded the description you sent me to the parties you specified. Raul654 00:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vasco supporter

Hey, Redux. It seems like this 170.66.1.155 (talk · contribs) is back. And very tendencious. —Lesfer ^(t/c/@) 21:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) —Lesfer ^(t/c/@) 01:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Awards

There are three proposals which need some comments. Please weigh in:

Two of the three are sensitive, and thuglas is taking the whole process personally. Finally, there has never been a standard for how much support is needed for the creation of a barnstar. The LGBT star went up with seven votes, and thuglas is threatening to post his star when he gets ten supportive votes. Thoughts? --evrik ^(talk) Barnstar]]

Two of the three are sensitive, and thuglas is taking the whole process personally. Finally, there has never been a standard for how much support is needed for the creation of a barnstar. The LGBT star went up with seven votes, and thuglas is threatening to post his star when he gets ten supportive votes. Thoughts? --evrik ^(talk)

Once again, someone disagrees with my interpretation of our very loose guidelines. Now I don't mind when two users like WJBscribe and Kathryn_NicDh%C3%A0na, but they've taken the disagreement and posted negative comments over at that RFC.

So ... could you please weigh in one last time ... new barnstar or a wikiproject award Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals/New_Proposals#The_Copyeditor.27s_Award. Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 22:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting of tennis players' pages

User:Lman1987, under various names and IP addresses, continues to try and change the formatting of the records sections of various tennis players' pages. The user is trying to make what they believe to be a constructive improvement (and to some extent I see their point on how it would be nice to see players' finals all listed in chronological order), but definately needs a lesson in constructive discussion and enagagement on Wikipedia.

I previously said on User:Tennis expert's talk page that I didn't like this user's ideas on formatting becuase it made it very hard to pick out wins from losses in that format. But it has occured to me that if each entire line of wins had its text in bold and losses were not in bold, that problem might be solved and we'd in fact have what might be quite a good format.

Here's how that would look for Jim Courier's Grand Slam finals:

Wins (4) / Runner-ups (3)

Year	Championship	Opponent in Final	Result	Score in Final
1991	French Open (1)	Andre Agassi	Win	3-6, 6-4, 2-6, 6-1, 6-4
1991	U.S. Open	Stefan Edberg	Loss	2-6, 4-6, 0-6
1992	Australian Open (1)	Stefan Edberg	Win	6-3, 3-6, 6-4, 6-2
1992	French Open (2)	Petr Korda	Win	7-5, 6-2, 6-1
1993	Australian Open (2)	Stefan Edberg	Win	6-2, 6-1, 2-6, 7-5
1993	French Open	Sergi Bruguera	Loss	4-6, 6-2, 2-6, 6-3, 3-6
1993	Wimbledon	Pete Sampras	Loss	6-7, 6-7, 6-3, 3-6

And here's how it would look for Stefan Edberg's:

Wins (6) / Runner-ups (5)

Year	Championship	Opponent in Final	Result	Score in Final
1985	Australian Open (1)	Mats Wilander	Win	6-4, 6-3, 6-3
1987	Australian Open (2)	Pat Cash	Win	6-3, 6-4, 3-6, 5-7, 6-3
1988	Wimbledon (1)	Boris Becker	Win	4-6, 7-6, 6-4, 6-2
1989	French Open	Michael Chang	Loss	1-6, 6-3, 6-4, 4-6, 2-6
1989	Wimbledon	Boris Becker	Loss	0-6, 6-7, 4-6
1990	Australian Open	Ivan Lendl	Loss	6-4, 6-7, 2-5 (retired)
1990	Wimbledon (2)	Boris Becker	Win	6-2, 6-2, 3-6, 3-6, 6-4
1991	U.S. Open (1)	Jim Courier	Win	6-2, 6-4, 6-0
1992	Australian Open	Jim Courier	Loss	3-6, 6-3, 4-6, 2-6
1992	U.S. Open (2)	Pete Sampras	Win	3-6, 6-4, 7-6, 6-2
1993	Australian Open	Jim Courier	Loss	2-6, 1-6, 6-2, 5-7

What do you think? Would this in fact be both an improvement and a reasonable accommodation that might stop the current edit war?

Just a thought.

Regards,

Zaxem 05:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into the formatting possibility. However, editing from several accounts/IPs, editing at a clearly accelerated pace, ignoring other users' requests to stop and discuss, and re-reverting back to one's own version disregarding the obvious disagreement of other users involved in the creative process of the articles all represent a very inappropriate modus operandi, one that is disruptive and ends up taking the focus away from the effort of creating the best article possible. And those are the reasons why I blocked this individual. In this regard, Wikipedia works by consensus, and not by one person's opinions, no matter how "sure" they might be that what they are doing is right. Hopefully, he will take this cool-off timeout to realize that either he will discuss his ideas for improving the articles, since people have opposed them, or he just won't be able to get them to stick. Redux 05:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find that this user has started editing again under a new IP address - 65.6.32.205. I fully agree with your decision to block this user for attempting to impose a format on others without consultation and for multiple disruptive reverts. However I'm also saying that the user may nevertheless have a point about the existing format and, with a bit of tweaking, a format could possibly be worked out which will satisfy everybody. I have no intention of attempting to implement the format I've suggested above unless there's a broad level agreement reached among regular tennis editors to do so. Zaxem 07:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked the IP for obvious circumvention of a previous, still standing block. I have also reverted by rollback all his edits that had not already been reverted: edits by a blocked user circumventing the block are reverted immediately. This is further indication of an uncooperative demeanor that really doesn't help anyone, himself included. Redux 07:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. Zaxem 07:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same vandal, new IP address: User talk:70.153.126.141. Supertigerman 17:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Addressed in the same manner as the previous circumvention. All edits to articles made by a blocked user circumventing the block are to be reverted on sight. I've rolled back on everything he had edited from this latest IP. Redux 20:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another sock puppet: User talk:72.155.106.191. Supertigerman 14:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. All edits reverted by rollback. Thank you. Redux 14:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Yet another: User talk:Super Tennis Villian.

I have banned the account. Thank you again. Redux 23:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resurrection of the vandals, now the semi-protection tag doesn't help. User talk: Tennis Bossman. Supertigerman 05:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards Coordinator referendum

There has been some conflict at Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards. Please vote on the Coordinator referendum. --South Philly 20:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please delete an edit...

Hi may you please delete this edit by 71.56.117.225 as it is very sexualy over towened. Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talkTodays Pick 01:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't seem to be a need for a deletion in this case. It's clear vandalism, and it has been reverted. It also serves as evidence of this individual's disruptive behavior. Deleting it would make it only accessible to administrators, and there really seems to be no need for that. Redux 23:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage History

Can you please delete my userpage history until 21:18 February 9. The earlier revisions contain embarrassing and personal information, which I don't want disclosed. Thanks. --KZ ^Talk ^• ^Vandal ^• ^Contrib 08:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no edit in your history made at 21:18 on February 9. What this probably means is that your preferences are adjusted to your own timezone, whereas I'm viewing the times in UTC time. To solve this, could you please provide a link to the first old version you do not want deleted? Given the time, I would suspect this is it, but it would be best to have it confirmed. Thank you. Redux 15:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thats the revision i wanted to be deleted up to. Sorry about the different timezones. --KZ ^Talk ^• ^Vandal ^• ^Contrib 23:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done Redux 23:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KyraVixen's RfA

I must admit, I'm a little annoyed with the result of this. If you look at this revision, the last before it was due to close, you can see it was at 75% exactly. The next revision was another support changed from a neutral bringing up the boundary to 75.47. Now, I'm not so strict with numbers, but considering how late this was closed, I think the result was a little unfair. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 15:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm aware that the consensus was at 75% at the time of the original deadline, and I did find a problem or two in one or two of the opposers, but ultimately, 75% is too much of a borderline. We should promote at this level of consensus only if we find serious problems on the opposition side. That was not the case. There was opposition due to lack of project space work and alleged insufficent article writing, among other things. While many might disagree with such reasons, it is not enough to disregard the users' input and promote at 75% (remember, if we were to talk numbers exclusively, which is highly unrecommendable, the pass line is actually at 80%). I suppose, hypothetically speaking, that if there had been significative opposition where the reason given was the self-nom having been written in the third-person, there might have been grounds for considering promoting at 75%. But that was not the case. The consensus to promote, in this case, simply did not surpass the consensus not to promote by the required margin. It does seem, however, that it would be very simple for Kyra to address the concerns raised, and if nothing else changes, she would appear to be a shoo-in the next time around. Redux 16:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your detailed reply :) Majorly _{(o rly?)} 16:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cant stop Me pal

I have unlimited IP addresses , you are in the middle of a war. You should just stay out. Most people agree with me now anyway., check out the Federer, Nadal, Tennis expert (that hard headed dope) talk pages. Everyone agrees with me. I WILL NEVER QUIT. I could care less if your an administrator or not. I know what im talkin about. I know you will block this account soon so i gotta go. but be sure you havent seen the last of me.

Changing username

Feel free to add back anything you think is necessary, but in my experience, if the instructions are reasonably short and simple, people actually do read them. It's much more user-friendly without the enormous red boxes, too. I'd like to leave it as is for a week or so to see how well people react. If problems arise as you say, we can fix it accordingly. — Dan | talk 04:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bureacrats

Hi Redux. Thanks for closing the overdue RfA. It seems there is now a need for another Bureacrat, which makes me smile ruefully at those who've opposed RfBs recently using "no need" arguments. Yes, it happened for unforseen unfortunate reasons, but hey, you can forsee that unforsee things will happen! --Dweller 13:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I always say that anyone who feels qualified should run — as long as they understand the "less glamourous" aspect of the job, and the high risk of burning out doing it. The results of the three most recent RfBs, however, suggest that a significative morcel of the community would prefer to let the dust settle on Essjay's resignation before they are prepared to discuss a new Bureaucrat. So far, however, I haven't seen any particular increase in the job queue that didn't exist right before Essjay discontinued his work. I am, of course, speaking solely of Bureaucrat work, and not considering any effects there might have been on CheckUser or Oversight work, where Essjay was also quite active. Redux 13:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having just glanced at some of the less savoury comments you get on your talk page, can I just point out, as an average Joe round here (not even an admin) that your efforts for this project are greatly appreciated by the vast majority of users. We're just so snowed under with things to do, we don't usually find the time to come along and say so. So "thank you". --Dweller 15:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it. Thanks. :-) Redux 17:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little help

Hey there! Would you help me in telling Blgeoverlord (talk · contribs) about article names regarding footballers? Please, also inform him about adding dead links in articles. I told him everything about it, but checking his contribs it seems he'd just chosen to ignore me. Cheers —Lesfer ^(t/c/@) 22:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser

Since you have checkuser permission, can you confirm if User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam is either 203.115.31.180 or 222.165.157.129? I have a nagging suspicion that he uses these ip address as an excuse for his continuous violation of COI. --KZ ^Talk ^• ^Vandal ^• ^Contrib 08:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: You have overlooked things. The IP address 222.165.157.129 is Netmonger's. The evidence is here. How can you ask either this or that?Rajkumar Kanagasingam 07:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide links to this behavior? We need concrete evidence of signigicative abuse that would need a CheckUser procedure to be addressed properly. Otherwise, if those two IPs are behaving inappropriately, just have them blocked normally. Thanks, Redux 13:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's been blocked for 3RR and been warned for COI. He says on his talk page that someone has hacked his account. I have a strong suspicion that he is using the ip addresses as a scapegoat to explain his innocence. --KZ ^Talk ^• ^Vandal ^• ^Contrib 02:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request the checkuser should be used parallelly for Nemonger as well. There is no need to use IP addresses as scapegoat.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 07:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any possibility a checkuser could be done to confirm whether he is telling the truth once and for all? Because this is getting really ugly and has spilled over to a number of talk pages including User talk:Jimbo Wales.

I went through this over the pass hour and from what I gather this is basically what happened.

User:Rajsingam started editing Wikipedia last year, and claimed to be the individual Rajkumar Kanagasingam. He initially made a number of edits to that article.
When his bio was proposed for deletion, a new account User:DoDoBirds popped and and voted keep on the AFD,[1] and both accounts voted on a later TFD, violating WP:SOCK.[2] [3]
Suspicious that they were the same person, a user filed a sockpuppet case against both accounts, and User:Rajsingam admitted that DoDoBirds indeed was his own account[4] and promptly redirected the user page of User:DoDoBirds to User:Rajsingam in January.[5] After that both accounts were relatively silent.
Then this week User:Rajsingam posts a dreadful personal attack on User:Netmonger's talk page [6] and promptly indef blocked. He had previously had some dispute with Netmonger and Netmonger even filed a Requset for Comment again Rajsingham. User:DoDoBirds too then posted a personal attack on User talk:Jimbo Wales [7] and was also blocked.
After that a new account pops up named User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam, and says that User:Rajsingam and User:DoDoBirds are indeed his accounts, and that he shared the passwords of them with his friends and they misused the accounts.[8] He later identified the users he gave his password to as User:RaveenS and User:Bakasuprman [9].
Now he is claiming that someone has hacked his hacked his Wikipedia passwords as well as his email passwords and just keeps throwing the blame around everywhere.

I believe this will fall under the code "F" of WP:RFCU because if the given user was banned indefinitely for making this personal attack, he is now making these allegations that his account was used by someone else and is trying to evade the block by using the account User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam. So could you please see if the IP that logged on as User:Rajsingam to make this personal attack was the same as one user by User:Rajkumar Kanagasingam? From what I gather he lives in Sri Lanka, and the 2 users he shared his passwords with User:RaveenS and User:Bakasuprman are in the US and India respectively, so I hope that it shouldn't be that difficult. And it will clear a lot of things and hopefully resolve this ugly mess. --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 03:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One clarification, I am from Canada and my Canadian IP's are all linked to my User account when ever I edit without signing. I sometimes edit from the USA, Mexico or Brazil when travelling and I do my best to sign on and if I don't sign on I link that IP to my user account (I did that once from the USA). The above mentioned user(s) has removed all the comments on various talk pages that he made about sharing his password with me after I requested him to do so. Thanks RaveenS 16:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy that the checkuser to use first clear me and then against Netmonger and others.At the moment I am in Sri Lanka, but those who misused my user account "Rajsingam" and "DoDoBirds" also in Sri Lanka.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 05:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another two attempts to access my password by unauthorized requests was rejected

(1)

An unauthorized request for password for your account was rejected.

Details of the request:

For account: rajsingam@mail.com

Password be sent to : xyz@google.com

Request from IP address : 128.205.146.89

Request Date/Time : 2007-03-09 17:28:46 GMT

Note: This IP address is from Buffalo, New York, USA. Any wikipedian will come to know who might be this(possible) from his userspace, who is always troubling me.He has come out with a lengthy statement with Delete vote on my bio AFD here. Rajkumar Kanagasingam 06:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha New York. That's where I am right now. Interesting. I see what you are implying. The accusations keep flying around. And where was the 2nd attempt from?

To be honest, instead of spamming so many people's talk pages (and I'm sorry about my part in it), I think the only way to solve this will be for check user to clear things up.

Redux do you think you can sort this out, or do you want us to post an official request on WP:RFCU? --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 07:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The second attempt is from France(the city unknown). The checkuser should be used against you and Netmonger as well.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 07:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser for Netmonger: A user filed checkuser request with manipulative statements against me. I have suspicion he was trying to hack my password because of the evidencehere. But Netmonger tried and the evidences are here. The one who misused my "Rajsingam" and "DoDoBirds" are actually Netmonger. So I request you to use the same checkuser for Netmonger as well. Otherwise it will impartial.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 11:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of Rajsingams allegations and My response in his talk page

Please compare the following undersigned IP address by Netmonger on his Talk Page and the request for my e-mail's password from the IP address below.

Talk Page: Netmonger

Thanks.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 13:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by Netmonger

You simply dont learn do you.. :-) How would anyone believe, that you posting message here that somebody requested for your password from a particular IP is true...

The points to notice here is

The requested password is emailed to your own gmail account (are u saying that password is also cracked!!!).. (how stupid one could be to request a password and get it emailed to another email address of the same person)
You shared your passwords with your friends, which is a very stupid thing to do.Evidence
You said the friends whom shared the passwords with are angry with you. Evidence Evidence2
You admitted you used the same passwords for the email and wiki and friends misused it.Evidence
Wikipedia is not a place to solve your inability to protect your own email box.
who gave you the right to use my signature on the title of the topic? ( I have removed it..)
This is evidence enough that you dont deserve an article of your own...

Albert Einstein said “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”

thanks ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 14:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P:S: Whoever cracked this guys passwordS... (if they were really cracked) please let me know how to do it.. I didn't know email passwords are so easy to crack/hack.. bcos in this case it seems they were cracked/hacked almost everyday ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 14:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Netmonger

Hey, Netmonger,

Don't bluff anymore.

This is wikipedia, otherwise I know how to address you.

If an authorised administrator request, I will give the password of the e-mail - rajsingam@mail.com (which I changed before you changed the password).

There the evidence of your IP address is there.

I don't want to discuss anything anymore with you.

Even I won't answer to you anything if you post anything.

I request an Administrator to advise me what to do next.

That is not my friends you did those malicious postings everywhere first stealing my e-mail password(I used my first name "rajkumar" as password initially). Thereafter you found my wiki passwords from there.

Thanks.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 14:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well who is bluffing is very visible with the evidence I have given. That should be sufficient. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 14:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more comment

The editor Rajasingams behaviour has been highly disruptive all the time, his primary concern in wikipedia is promoting his book "Germans in Asia", its very clear he is trying to use wikipedia to promote his book, his allegations of people trying to hack his email account and succeeding is just an impossible story (in other words its a lie), www.mail.com do not allow users password requests to be sent to any email account you want, its only sent to the alternative email address provided at the time of registration, if one alternate address is not provided, the site prompts for the secret question for which the answer is known only to the account holder (In this case Rajasingam is claiming it is sent to Tawady@yahoo.com, xyz@gmail.com, Rajsingam@gmail.com). All this is verifiable with the site, and it is normal email security procedure in place for any web based email account. To further explain, even if someone uses Brute force attack to hack, there is a 2 to 4 second delay on response from the site (for example hotmail has this feature) which makes even bruteforce impossible as it would take an Eon to crack the password, presumably email.com also would have all these security features, so this story of people cracking his password is unbelievable.

Further more I have evidence of this editor violating so many of wikipedia's policies here User:Netmonger/RfC, this Rfc was failed because, the editors certifying signed in the wrong place, if required I can get those editors to testify for this. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 06:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Today in my e-mail I received this

Sorry, we are unable to release your password because the information you have provided does not match our records.

Details of the request:
For account: rajsingam@mail.com
Password be sent to : tawady@yahoo.com
Request from IP address : 64.15.152.44
Request Date/Time : 2007-03-10 17:00:14 GMT

I have not made a request to know rajsingam@mail.com ‘s password. someone else made the request masquerading as me. This is getting weirder by the hourRaveenS 17:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those who manipulate things think always I am a fool.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 17:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raveen, Others can't make me fool that you are trying to steal my password. I trust you. I made a mistake initially. Now I know the real crooksRajkumar Kanagasingam 18:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note for an authorised Administrator

If an authorised administrator requests, I will give the password of the e-mail - rajsingam@mail.com (which I changed before "Netmonger and Group" changed the password).

There the evidence of Netmonger and Group's IP addresses are there.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 15:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Administrator's statement on why the Rfc was failed

The Administrator's statement is here on User:Netmonger/RfC why the Rfc was failed.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 15:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the original request, I've verified that the accounts that were under suspicion have been indefblocked already. I would like to make it very clear that sharing an account's password, and in effect sharing the account itself, with other people is not admissible. Compromised accounts will all be banned immediately, and will only be reinstated iff we are satisfied that the owner has repented, will not do it again and managed to restore exclusive access to his or her account.
Regarding Netmonger, if a request for checkuser has already been filed on the public forum, it would be best if it is addressed there (and it probably already was, I haven't checked at this point), so as to prevent checking the account repeated times without communication between the users doing the checking (if it is the case).
If there is any evidence that anyone is currently using IPs to violate policy, since the accounts in question have all already been banned, as I mentioned, I would ask that the diffs be posted, so that we can look into it. In requesting a check on another user, it is key to provide the diffs and links to the perceived violations and inappropriate behavior. Thank you. Redux 12:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appologise for sharing the passwords with my friends. I have the exclusive access to the account Rajkumar Kanagasingam and I won’t repeat the same mistake once again.

I am only responsible for the account Rajkumar Kanagasingam and not any account/s in wikipedia.

The followings are the diffs and links to the perceived violations and inappropriate behavior.

Postings by misusing the account DoDoBirds

[10][11]

Postings by misusing the account Rajsingam

[12][13][14][15]

If you request, I will leave the password of the e-mail(rajsingam@mail.com) to the e-mail address which you are suggesting. You will find there, the IP address of the wikipedia user who tried to access my e-mail address with other suspected IP addresses (which were directly forwarded by mail.com server). Some attempts later on to access the e-mail address are only to distract the real culprits from the scene.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 15:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CHU

Hi Redux. Sorry for the terse explanation at CHU. I had cleared the backlog at almost midnight my time after a long day so I wasn't at my thinking best. Another reason why I denied the request was that the correspondence was through email, and there would be no logs present that could prove that the user desired to change his username. Hence, I also denied it on those grounds. Although I am not averse to changing the username, considering the circumstances you mention, I would still recommend that the user log in to make a request. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked users can edit their talk pages, so they can make change requests there. Personally, I would like to see some form of traceable requests made by the user for us to carry out renames for the sake of proper auditing. I have contacted Pathoschild to establish contact with the user. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD on Rajkumar Kanagasingam

Hi,

An AFD on my Bio Rajkumar Kanagasingam is brought only to distract the offences at wikipedia after stealing my e-mail address and thereafter my wiki passwords by Netmonger and his/her group and nothing else. How this user can bring this AFD before he clears himself from the offences which is now under investigation under an Administrator’s supervision and the details are here.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 04:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Brazil

Eu quis apenas padronizar o visual com os outros portais de países latinos como o Portal:Mexico ou Portal:Argentina, que estão visualmente melhores e mais organizados que o portal brasileiro... JoãoFelipe ^{( Let's talk! )} 19:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Você poderia falar em português? É melhor... JoãoFelipe

^{( Let's talk! )} 20:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hmm....its either Portugese or Spanish...11 languages! I feel so ordinary... --KZ ^Talk ^• ^Contrib 10:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dedo de Deus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dedo de Deus.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the image with the appropriate tag, in which a short reasoning is already provided. This image was uploaded more than 3 years ago, which might as well be a century, in "wiki time". In all this time, I've not come across a free image that would replace it. Furthermore, three years ago, I had a discussion with a user, now departed, I think, in which we arrived at the conclusion that that image was fair use and could stay under this provision, which is also explained in the page description since that time. Redux 16:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian films

Hi!! Please can you help fill in the List of Brazilian films I am afraid it will be up for afd. I and a few other users are trying to fill the lists by country in. If you can add the details on the films already on wikipedia in year order from Category:Brailzian films and any others you know of from notable directors etc that would be a great help for WP Film sand Brazil!. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E"} 16:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you. I shall always do my best for the community.--Anthony.bradbury 09:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki pt

Caro Redux, venho aqui incomodá-lo porque estou extremamente preocupado com a situação que se vive na wiki lusófona. Há uma votação em curso para expulsão de um usuário com acusações que se relacionam com a problemática da pedofilia. Parece-me a mim que a situação está a caminho de um descontrolo total e que poderá ter consequências graves para o projecto. A PatríciaR contactou diversas vezes pessoas da Mediawiki, cujas respostas vão no sentido de ser a comunidade a lidar com o assunto. Temo, porém, que, muito em breve, a comunidade venha a entrar em situação de grave ruptura.

Se fosse possível, pedia-lhe que se mantivesse informado e que informasse a Wikifoundation sobre o que se está a passar. Poderá começar por ler o assunto na esplanada, onde há um pequeno resumo do que se passou. A votação está em curso em pt:Wikipedia:Votações/Bloqueio infinito de Paulo Andrade, com uma discussão que, apesar de importante no início, acabou por se tornar impossível de ler e inútil, pela sua extensão (creio que acabará por acontecer o mesmo na esplanada). Os antecedentes estão em pt:Discussão:Pedofilia#Pedofilia disfarçada? (discussão que tinha começado na esplanada e só depois foi movida para essa localização).

Desculpe-me incomodá-lo, mas parece-me que extremamente importante que este assunto seja seguido de perto por alguém que ao mesmo tempo seja falante de português e conheça bem a Wikifoundation, de modo a que, se necessário, haja uma intervenção na altura certa (se é que ela já não deveria ter acontecido). Abraço, Ozalid 13:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Bad edits again

Hi, Redux. Would you please take a look at 170.66.1.155 (talk · contribs) latest edits? From time to time, it's always the same. It seems this guy just won't stop. 201.53.28.14 15:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:SatyrBot

You might like to check out User_talk:SatyrBot/Current_project#What_on_earth_is_this.3F. I have blocked this bot till the matter is sorted out. Also on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#LocateMe_bot. Tyrenius 00:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Julio Iglesias Brasil.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Julio Iglesias Brasil.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudz679 00:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC) - Cloudz679 00:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone uploaded a better version of that album cover. I see no reason to keep the file I uploaded, then. Feel free to delete. Redux 13:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was me. What I should have done was notice there was already an image in the album page and simply overwrite it. A lesson for next time. Thanks for your help! Cloudz679 23:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

anon again

Hey, man, sorry to bother you again, but this guy, 170.66.1.155 (talk · contribs), can't stop. Take a look at his recent edits in Flamengo's article. Cheers —Lesfer ^(t/c/@) 21:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

Do note that users who suddenly return to oppose an RfA (they weren't on Wikipedia for 6 months but heard about the RfA on CNN? huh?) may very well be sockpuppets, but are not necessarily going to be discovered by an imperfect checkuser. Some of the confirmed sockpuppets did indeed fit exactly into this pattern, e.g. [16] & [17]. I don't see people not editing Wikipedia whatsoever yet checking WP:RFA every week. —Centrx→talk • 02:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I rang this off prior to finishing reading, though it is still relevant in the sockpuppet part. —Centrx→talk • 03:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind...

...that those citing the Essjay incident object the fact that he also voted in it, besides from making the final call, and afaik, that's the only reason they brought it up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.123.158.228 (talk) 03:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I'm aware that the fact that Danny had also participated was a factor. But as I said, about two people questioned Danny's judgement and ability to perform as an Administrator based on his decision to promote Essjay period. And saying that Danny had [allegedly] failed as a Bureaucrat and that would mean that he is unfit to be an Administrator is a non sequitur, or else all failed RfBs should result in desysopping of the candidates. I should clarify that this doesn't mean that those people's input would be disregarded altogether, not by a long shot. But in my analysis, a different weight has to be given to this reasoning. Redux 03:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is also very unusual. Normally, we could never make any kind of judgement in the context of a RfA based on performance as a Bureaucrat. Further: of the 3 or 4 people (note: I've not memorized exactly who said what; there's over 300 participants in that RfA) that mentioned Danny's decision in Essjay's RfB — of which about 2 only ever mentioned his promoting Essjay, without any allusion to whether or not it was because of his previous participation and/or the context of that RfB — I don't think anyone noted the fact that he had !voted as well as the sole reason for questioning his judgement. Whenever it was brought up, it was combined with the fact that promoting Essjay in that RfB was the wrong call in itself, and that would go to indicate that Danny's judgement in using the tools is not completely inspiring of trust. Again, I didn't consider that anyone who said that should be discarded; as a matter of fact, some of the people cited other reasons for opposing (about half of them). It's just that this particular reasoning should, in my view, carry a little less weight. Redux 03:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with sockpupettry

Oi Redux, Preciso da sua ajuda. REDVERS, um Administrador que está trabalhando com a página da Fellowship of Friends me deixou a seguinte mensagem:

Hi, Mario. On the talk page of Fellowship of Friends, I offered Wikipedia's best way for how to resolve these disputes (basically WP:RS); sadly, this was basically ignored and very obvious sockpuppetry was resorted to instead, by people who held the high ground in the dispute.

Já escrevi para o REDVERS mas ele não me respondeu. Como posso descobrir quem são os sock pupeteers usando os links que o REDVERS me mandou ( este e este)? Muito obrigado! Mario Fantoni 18:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mario, you've brought this issue up already on ANI. Please read canvassing before sending any more of these notices around in unrelated talk pages, in whatever language they are in. --KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 23:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Open champions (Men's Doubles)

I noticed that you created Australian Open champions (Men's Doubles) way back when. Do you remember what data source you used? I'd like to add flags to the list of champions and runners-up. --dantheox 05:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Just notifying you of an email I sent regarding personal issues. --KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 10:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the recent RFA

I couldn't help but note that in your comments on the recent RFA quoted here where you state that you have "identified several users amid the opposers that had not edited for a long time, sometimes months, and came back solely to oppose Danny. They didn't have a problematic history for the most part, but this attitude goes to motivation."

I would assume I am among those mentioned. I find it disconcerting that you would assume that my absence, or anyone else's from active editing, and subsequent vote to oppose the nomination would be done in bad faith. If you had asked, I could have told you that the two are directly intertwined. Danny's actions and comments evidence a deep disrespect toward editors and makes him unfit to be an administrator. It is because of this disrespect that many do not edit. It is because this disrespect is seemingly being rewarded is why I likely will not be back soon. And, to disabuse part of your statement, despite not having logged in for a while, I never went away (ergo, I did not "come back" from anywhere). Have a nice day. Jtmichcock 17:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Moralis

Is it just me or does this RfA look completely messed up? It's going to make it really difficult to counting up the !votes... --KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 03:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is !votes :-). Anyway, see WT:RFA#Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Moralis I personally think it is a bad idea, especially on RfAs like say this one. Now imagine a DannyfA out of order with no "Support/Oppose" prefixes. That would kill the bureaucrats, right Redux? I think that at least some of the crats will agree with that. But who am I to judge? Prodego ^talk 03:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't see that post... Personally, I agree with Prodego as it'll be mayhem if 500 or so people vote about this and a bureaucrat has to sort them out... --KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 04:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Melbourne_Park.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Melbourne_Park.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 18:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Badlydrawnjeff

I was just wondering, why did you close the RfA as unsuccessful? It had 75.7% support (according to my calculations). I think that is normally considered consensus to promote, so I would just like to know your reasoning. If there are any other issues I should know about (I might nominate him soon), then please tell me. Thanks! Ab e g92contribs 22:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers are not the reason RfAs fail, though they can be indicators. Redux does not believe that the commenters on the RfA had consensus in trusting BDJ with the admin tools. Read the oppose section. Prodego ^talk 01:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with Jeeny

Hey Redux. This user continues to make bad-faith edits to the article Cho Seung-hui. If you look over the edit history, she continues to change the phrase "Cho's mother's aunt" to the less precise "great aunt" without even discussing her changes. While debate brews on the discussion page over the appropriate wording, she ignores the debate and makes her own edits without considering the views of others. In the process, she removes sources that do not support her point of view, such as The Guardian. Here is an example of the edit she has been making repeatedly [18]. Can you please leave a warning message on her page, informing her to a. discuss her changes, and b. not ignore consensus. Thanks! Stanley011 17:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Bush expand tag

Hey mate, in response to ur removal of the expand, that's fare enough that u removed it. But to my understanding (maybe im wrong, u can confirm) once a stub is no longer a stub (in which this case this article was deff not a stub) a "expand" tag gets added to encourage people to continue on with making the article bigger/better etc. I found this article in a 'stub removal' page on one of the 'FIX wikipedia project' pages, tho the stub was allready removed by the time i got to this article. Anyway once the stub is removed we are encouraged to add either cleanup,expand,uncategorized,unreferenced,stubsection or expandsection (or even nothing) depending on the state of the article. I (in my random opinion) believed to add a expand to this article, but maybe i was wrong. Thanks for watching out either way hehe. Cya later. petze 03:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation with the expand tag and what not. Shall ensure i make beter assesments of the articles and add the tag only if i have something that needs to be specifically added. Keep up the great work. Cya.petze 07:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Olá

Olá, queria pedir a sua ajuda para atualizarmos o Portal:Brazil, o portal está sem vida, precisamos fazer algo. Achei o Portal:Mexico bastante interessante, um visual muito tranquilo e moderno, bonito. As seções April in the history of Mexico, Things you can do, Mexico-related featured content e Maps poderiam ser acrescentadas ao Portal:Brazil. O que acha? Espero sua resposta... JoãoFelipe ^{( Let's talk! )} 19:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Você poderia falar em português? É que eu só tenho um nível intermediário de inglês, não sou muito bom. JoãoFelipe

^{( Let's talk! )} 15:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil Collaboration

Hello! You showed support for Brazil Collaboration. This time is the Brazil Collaboration. Hope you can help.
Cast your vote to select the next collaboration!
Nominate an article that could be greatly improved.

JoãoFelipe ^{( Let's talk! )} 22:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry... JoãoFelipe

^{( Let's talk! )} 02:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award

The disco ball of knowledge certifies that you are among the finest contributors in the world of Wikipedia, and help it to never stop turning.

ISOLA'd ELBA 17:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian Opympic Comitte images on PUI

Hi, I've listed all the images from the Brazilian Opymipc Comitte you uploaded back in 2004 on Possibly unfree images since they are licensed for non-commercial use only. All non-free images need to have fair use rationales written for theyr use or be deleted per our current licensing policy. --Sherool (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Brazil

I go to speak in Portuguese to express me better...

Eu candidatei o Portal:Brazil para ser um Featured portal. No decorrer da votação um usuário me perguntou onde eram feitas as escolhas do Selected article e Selected picture, eu tentei procurar mais não achei, você pode responder?

The text in English (Use a translator)

I candidated the Portal:Brazil to be one Featured portal. In elapsing of the voting an user asked itself where was made the choices of Selected article and Selected picture, I tried to look for more I did not find, you can answer? JoãoFelipe ^{( Let's talk! )} 03:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC) ~[reply]

Redux, we have to expand the article Economy of Brazil, urgently! JoãoFelipe

^{( Let's talk! )} 03:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg

Hello, Redux. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Redux/Archive05. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Bush related vandalism

The same person who's been playing around with Sophia Bush's page has also been doing their strange unsourced edits to Kenzie Dalton and Chad Michael Murray. Might there be a chance they could be semi-protected too? Or maybe at least kept an eye on, for future reference? Any help would be muchly appreciated! :) -Ebyabe 15:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. While I was in the neighbourhood, I did some edit's to Sophia's page, hopefully improving it. :) -Ebyabe 15:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got your message (yes, that Ebyabe was me), and thank you muchly for semi-protecting the other two articles. Out of curiosity, I checked some of the IPs and noticed they were mostly from Sweden, of all places. Guess the Hill is popular over there. The vandalism seems like it's trying to retcon the Chad-Sophia relationship, and take Kenzie out of the picture. What some people do with their time amazes me. Unlike folks like us, doncha know. Gracias again, mon frere. :) -Ebyabe 11:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Niterói Itacoatiara Beach.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Niterói Itacoatiara Beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Davis Cup.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Davis Cup.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not recent. It was uploaded more than 2 years ago. I created that image of an official logo, but it appears that it is now orphaned, probably because something better came along. If it's the case, delete it, then. Redux 18:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the news

Redux, as nóticias que você colocou são exageradamente grandes para uma pequena predefinição. Se você quiser detalhar manchetes use a página Portal:Current events/Brazil, sua ajuda lá será muito bem vinda. Felipe ^{( talk )} 18:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pan American Games infobox

hello Redux,
i notice that the Pan Am Games series of articles is lacking some key articles so i made this template for use in your NOCs results pages courtesy of Andrscw: Template:Infobox Country PanAm Games. i hope this will help. more power! --RebSkii 19:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Davis Cup.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Davis Cup.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 18:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Davis Cup.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Davis Cup.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 18:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair Delition

Dear Redux, I would like to inform you that my user page,temples,userboxes,barnstars,etc. was delited by Shazaam. I feel that this action is unfair. Shazaam claims that my userpage needs to be simple but I find that I need a advanced userpage to help wikipedia in a more advanced way. I have gave a warning to Shazaam for the unfair delition.

Cordially, --ISOLA'd ELBA 19:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson, the link "Shazaam" goes to a subpage of Jeffrey O. Gustafson's. Either way, WP:ANI is a better place to bring this up. Prodego ^talk 20:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:100real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:100real 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:100real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:100real 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:100realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:100realback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:100realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:100realback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoI.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoII.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoII.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoIIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoIIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10centavoIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10real 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10real 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10realback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10realback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10realplastic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10realplastic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10realplastic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10realplastic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:10realplasticback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10realplasticback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:10realplasticback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10realplasticback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoI.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoII.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoII.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoIIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoIIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1centavoIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1real 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1real 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1realI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1realI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realI.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1realII 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realII 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1realII 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realII 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1realIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1realIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1realback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1reallIIback 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1reallIIback 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:1reallIIback 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1reallIIback 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:20real.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20real.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:20real.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20real.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:20realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20realback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:20realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20realback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:25centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:25centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoI.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:25centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoII.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:25centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoII.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:25centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoIIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:25centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoIIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:25centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:25centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25centavoIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:2real.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2real.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:2real.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2real.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:2realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2realback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:2realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2realback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:50centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoI.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:50centavoII 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoII 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50centavoII 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoII 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:50centavoIIback 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoIIback 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50centavoIIback 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoIIback 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:50centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50centavoIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:50real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50real 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50real 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:50realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50realback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:50realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:50realback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:5centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:5centavoI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoI.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:5centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoII.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:5centavoII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoII.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:5centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoIIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:5centavoIIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoIIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:5centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoIback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:5centavoIback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5centavoIback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:5real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5real 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 03:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:5real 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5real 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 03:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:5realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5realback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 03:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:5realback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5realback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 03:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Brazilian Olympic Committee Image

Template:Brazilian Olympic Committee Image has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Sherool (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Transporter3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Transporter3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 05:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 05:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Petropolis coat arms.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio de Janeiro coat arms.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Timeofyourlife.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Timeofyourlife.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 06:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ent Warp.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ent Warp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 07:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:GlennCorbett.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GlennCorbett.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 07:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pernambuco & Fernando De Noronha

Hello Redux! As you are the first adminstrator from Brazil I could find at Portal:Brazil I would like to ask you to take a look at this move by Cmm 394 [19] . I could not find a source for a name change of Pernambuco and such a name change seem to me to be against common sense a bit. In addition the other recent moves by this user are questionable at best. I'll try to sort out those related to the Dominican Republic as soon as I have got the time to do so. Thank you! VirtualDelight 22:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user has stopped moving pages around after another warning and undoing some more moves. Unsurprisingly without answering my concerns or using talk pages at all. Bolivian Unicyclist had brought this to ANI but it was archived there without reaction. So I think all is good for the moment. I'll keep an eye on further edits by Cmm 394, his IP or other incarnations. Best regards, VirtualDelight 08:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I'm awarding you the Rosetta Barnstar for having an amazing amount of nine other language Wikipedia accounts. I think I got it to format with the image gallery, and I used the Show Preview button. That must be a lot of translating you do. Outstanding job!--Wikipedier is now U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 05:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uncontroverted

Your use on BN of uncontroverted where I thought uncontroversial to be prescriptively preferred led me to investigate the former word, and I happened to learn that your usage, though rather uncommon, is in no way prescriptively disfavored, so I write, I suppose, to apologize for having upbraided you...in my head. Thanks, more seriously, for introducing me to an alternat(iv)e usage of uncontroverted of the presence of which I was, at best, mildly aware. Cheers, Joe 04:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question about 'cratship

I feel comfortable in my abilities as an administrator, and feel confident in taking a step further in my involvement with the project. I'm seriously considering submitting an RfB, but I'd like to get your opinion on the matter.

I've been an administrator since November 2006 (you're the one that made that change, which is partly why I'm asking you), and made my first edit back in February 2006. I'm active on both AN and ANI, and have been involved in numerous discussions on the RfA talk page. I've got what I feel is a healthy balance of edits (17k total, with 6k in the mainspace and almost 2k in the project), and most importantly, I've got a firm grasp of Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

The only problem, as I see it, is that I'm very much a Wikignome, both in my editorial contributions and in my administrative duties. I'd like to continue in that vein as a Bureaucrat; I'd like to handle the occasional RfA or account usurpation request on the side of clearing out the occasional Commons backlog or help get AIV under control. The argument of "we don't need another bureaucrat right now", while largely bogus in my opinion, is nonetheless very real; I don't want to waste anyone's time and energy, especially mine, with an RfB that will crash and burn (as much as I feel ready to become a bureaucrat, I do have enough patience to improve myself if need be).

Do you have any advice or thoughts on the matter? EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proceeding on Gracenotes' RfA

Hi Redux,

As one of the Bureaucrats recently active on RfA, I would like your opinion on how to handle Gracenotes' rather difficult RfA.

There are a huge number of opinions (over 200 supporting and over 70 opposing) and a great deal of argumentation. I would like to reserve a "Bureaucrat Chat" for the really, really difficult and unique situations, like Danny. My concerns here are that:

The bureaucrats should not be put in the position of being "supervoters," evaluating everything the community already hashed over, but at a "higher" level;
I would like to see this RfA separated from some very strong and quite valid (to the individuals most involved) emotion, as much as this is possible; and
Almost all the detailed opposition revolves around a single issue that I believe has acquired a life of its own separate from the candidate's qualifications, and I think Gracenotes at least deserves a chance to make a coherent presentation on the issue and allow the community to express their opinions anew in that light.

I had earlier posted a way forward that can be found (with some comments) at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#One_Bureaucrat.27s_Impression. I would like to proceed according to the six steps I suggested, which has the assent of both the Candidate, and the first opposer on the BADSITES issues, SlimVirgin.

I would be most grateful if you would contact me at my talk page with your assent, different solution and/or comment and discussion. Thanks! -- Cecropia 21:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]