User talk:Redandsymmetry

Orphaned non-free image File:Lust For Life Album Coverr.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lust For Life Album Coverr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Melanie Martinez (singer), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You asked why this material was removed. User:Tenebrae left a summary pointing to WP:CRYSTAL and WP:PROMOTIONAL. I agree. We don't need to mention an unreleased album in the header, particularly when the section contains almost no mention of the album.

Per WP:BRD onc eyou have been undone it is up to you to discuss the edit on the article's talk page rather than restoring the edit. Meters (talk) 21:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Melanie Martinez (singer). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Bump this to a personal attack warning. You stated that User:Tenebrae had removed it while "adding false information". That is completely incorrect. He or she added nothing, and simply removed your unwarranted header change with a very reasonable explanation. Meters (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My statement was not in reference to User:Tenebrae's edits. I was referring to previous edits that I had removed, the ones stating that the second album was called "Highschool". Apologies for the misunderstanding --Redandsymmetry (talk) 21:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How is is even remotely possible that this is a misunderstanding? You restored your previous edit, the header change and only the header change, here [1] with the summary Why was this removed? It's relevant to the section and I was adding it back (since it was there before) because it had gotten removed by someone adding false information. Meters (talk) 22:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was a misunderstanding because what I said was misinterpreted, which I admit was my fault since I worded it poorly. In my summary, I was talking about User:2604:3D09:257F:FFDA:A81A:FE63:7C26:58D8, who removed the part of the header while adding information to the page about the album that was untrue, not User:Tenebrae. The part of my edit summary where I mention that the piece of the header was removed by a person adding false info may have seemed like it was about User:Tenebrae, but I promise I did not intend for it to come off that way as it was not about them at all. I'm sorry I'm bad at wording things. --Redandsymmetry (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to read WP:HOLES and WP:DROPTHESTICK. 2604:3D09:257F:FFDA:A81A:FE63:7C26:58D8 never' touched the header. The IP made four obvious vandalism edits to the article [2] [3] [4] and [5]. All four edits were immediately reverted, the IP was warned each time, and you didn't make any of the reverts or the warnings. Meters (talk) 22:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I made a mistake and got the wrong user. I meant to say User:Apersonwithmagicalwonders, who I did remove the edits of. They were the person my summary was referring to. I'm sorry once again, but I'll stop arguing now. Please just know that I was not trying to attack User:Tenebrae and I hope you don't hate me for being a bit of an idiot.--Redandsymmetry (talk) 22:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Redandsymmetry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use Template:Duration outside of infoboxes

Please read the documentation. The template is not for use outside of infoboxes, so do not change instances of durations in track listings to the template. Thank you. Ss112 03:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I was simply following the format used on the page for Martinez's other album. I wasn't aware it wasn't supposed to be used there. Thank you for informing me. -- Redandsymmetry (talk) 03:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Six (musical) category

I just want to clarify why I categorized Six (musical) under 2019-2020 Broadway musicals, which you removed. Six will debut in Broadway in March 2020, which is covered by the 2019-2020 season. That season will be the basis of the 74th Tony Awards. The category does not mean that the musical debuted in Broadway in 2019. I hope this is clear. :) Rainaroo (talk) 03:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Six The Musical Tour Dates

Hiya there, although it’s not conventional to have Tour Dates ont the page I thought it might be a useful addition. So please let me keep the tour dates up on the Six page, as I spent over 3 HOURS creating it :) Flyingpig12345678 (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you spent a long time on it and you think it might be useful does not make it appropriate to put on the page because this is a musical, not an artist's tour. Please refrain from putting them back. --Redandsymmetry (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pretty Woman: The Musical, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Six (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Seymour.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Pauly (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The media coverage isn't there ... yet, so WP:NACTOR is not satisfied. It's just too soon in her career.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samantha Pauly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samantha Pauly, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redandsymmetry! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucy Moss

Hello, Redandsymmetry. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucy Moss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:11, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abby Mueller

Hello, Redandsymmetry. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abby Mueller, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucy Moss

Hello, Redandsymmetry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucy Moss".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abby Mueller

Hello, Redandsymmetry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abby Mueller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Call boo-boo baby

Call boo-boo baby Call Babo Babo Babo Super wrap Apple poo blah blah boo-boo blah boo-boo blah Poopoo blah Poopoo papa Poopoo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo 2600:1700:8880:2870:6093:95D7:65F2:6720 (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mean Girls: The Musical

Hello, since it seems you have an interest in the Mean Girls: The Musical, I wanted to stop by and let you know there is a draft at Draft:Mean Girls: The Musical that you ae welcome to edit. That page will be moved to mainspace when filming begins. Mike Allen 03:12, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lauren Marcus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Pauly has been accepted

Samantha Pauly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]