User talk:Red Highlighter

June 2024

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Left Democratic Front, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rashtriya Janata Dal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Johnnie Bob (talk) 18:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srimonbanik2007. Ravensfire (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hi Red Highlighter! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Rashtriya Janata Dal several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Rashtriya Janata Dal, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Left Democratic Front, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LDF don't have any right wing member. Its not big tent. Other than this I have done no change Red Highlighter (talk) 17:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Big tent isn't about position but ideology, and LDF is ideologically diverse! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Srimonbanik2007 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srimonbanik2007. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 22:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]