User talk:Realg21

February 2015

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to National Football League draft— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Rumble. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Royal Rumble was changed by Realg21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955688 on 2015-02-08T02:59:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Royal Rumble with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donner60 fan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Donner60 fan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Amortias (T)(C) 03:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Islington Junior Middle School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Islington Junior Middle School was changed by Realg21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872237 on 2015-02-08T03:31:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]