Jump to content

User talk:Reading Beans/Archives/2022/March

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Proposed deletion of All Shades of Iberibe

Notice

The article All Shades of Iberibe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOKS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:David Hundeyin

I have moved your article to draft space because it does not contain any explanation of how the subject meets the Wikipedia:Notability criteria. You can work on it there before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Portable (singer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Portable (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Celestina007, It’s funny that the both of them has COI tags — because they’re musicians? Simply moving them to draft wouldn’t have been so bad but calling me a "possible sock" then leave this at your edit summary as an evidence is quite disappointing. Articles that are draftified can’t be re-created? I only believe that an article is suitable IF they met the general notability guidelines, and the articles you moved does, but I shouldn’t break a sweat finding more sources — because they’re notable. Happy Mid-Sha'ban! READING BEANSTalk to the Beans 04:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Nobody insinuated that the COI tags were there due to they being musicians, it wasn’t never even implied so I’m not sure why you bring that up. I’m not sure this diff is what you think it is. Ah! I see Deb has recently moved one of your non notable articles back to Draftspace. Why are you creating articles on non notable Nigerian individuals? Celestina007 (talk) 05:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Celestina007, what are you doing? Deb messaged me manually, so IDK why you’re mentioning him. And for the diff, I am the sole contributor of the version you draftified, and am I not socking, neither do I know these folks.
Moving ahead, the last time I read GNG, it stated that I needed 3 reliable, independent sources that would be able to verify claims I made on articles. So, when ever I see an entity with sourced on reliable and independent newspapers, I tend to write about them or better still, add them to my sandbox — just incase I forget about the person. So, I am not creating articles about non-notable Nigerians. For David Hundeyin, this source on Blueprint, and this on ThisDay with this? on Daily Nigerian, and this on Arise News amongst others and the already cited ones surely makes me notable. I already have multiples source lined up in the web (you can check this ti verify if I’m lying), I am being just a lazy-ass-potato-man at the moment, that’s why I’ve left them as a draft, hopefully, I’ll get the time to develop these articles. READING BEANS Talk to the Beans? 09:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh? Okay then, do what you must & I’d what I do best. Peace Profound. Celestina007 (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Nope! I’m not. That’s a typo. And also, I’m editing the page no more, drama is something I definitely do not need. Shalom. READING BEANS Talk to the Beans? 14:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Reading Beans

Thank you for creating Becky Okorie.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This is a perfect example of encyclopedic value.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 11:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

    • BellaNaija is one of the worst unreliable sources in the history of Nigeria, not only are they originally are a gossip blog, the source has no editorial oversight, it is self published and has 0 reputation for fact checking please do not use it anymore asides that, the article seems okay. Celestina007 (talk) 11:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Good Job On Becky Okorie

I note you created an article on Becky Okorie I appreciate that, I for one deemed it a Herculean task thus I appreciate the fact that you created the article. To set the records straight & for transparency sake, you haven’t quite earned my trust, not that it matters, but by creating rather dubious articles such as Poco Lee & Portable (singer) both of which are non notable. You see, this topic areas are usually concomitant with unethical practices and most shocking is one of the editors here who attempted to create one of the aforementioned article has been indefinitely blocked. Whilst I appreciate your creation of the Becky Okorie article, I remain skeptical about your authenticity. Having said, are you any good at writing articles on books? Of yes then please as soon as can, I humbly want to appeal to you to create a an article about a book called Occult Grandmaster Now in Christ. If you can but do not want to, I perfectly understand, I combat what seems to be like dubious editing irrespective of whatever, so I do hope you understand why I am having a hard time, I protect the interest and integrity of the community thus anyone I believe is violating our TOU be it a functionary/Admin/wiki friends or whatever I drill them. Thank you for your time, please do give thoughts about creating the article I asked you to & upon completion do notify me and I’d show you what I call pointers. Have a nice week ahead. Celestina007 (talk) 11:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Celestina007, I have created the page about the book. I’ll look for more offline sources to add to it. We are only here to build up an encyclopedia — not trust. I only felt offended because something I did for free had a COI tag on it. READING BEANS Talk to the Beans? 21:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reading_Beans/Archives/2022/March&oldid=1081830219"