Jump to content

User talk:Rdfalberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Rdfalberg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hi, Good day. When adding sources, pls provide indepedent, reliable source. Utube is considered not reliable as it is user generated site. I have added 2 sources for your content, pls see HERE. Also pls see how to provide inline citation at referencing for beginners. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rdfalber, For you info as you seem interest in editing MMA aritcles. pls see the Wikipedia MMARroject guidelines - Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts as it outlines how to input fight table, notability guidelines and many other stuff. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo

Hi Rdfalberg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

09:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Josh Haynes. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC) Bbb23, all of my info was sourced, such as his new career as a Police Officer. Stop threatening me because the content I added had something to do with Donald Trump, a verified occurrence, and the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, of which his involvement in the police response is verified.[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arlene Brickman.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arlene Brickman.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mitt Romney. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 02:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add my own point of view to Mitt Romney. Everything I did was cited and verifiable.

Information icon Hi Rdfalberg! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 04:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Enhanced interrogation techniques, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr (talk) 01:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


VQuakr, you're just unfairly targeting me, trying to suppress me from ensuring Wiki content is neutral (as I did with Ben Carson's and Mitt Romney's pages). I don't appreciate the harassment I am getting from you VQuakr.

Yeah you're gonna want to read WP:HA#NOT, especially the last sentence. VQuakr (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Bishonen | tålk 22:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]