User talk:Rbentley9

I have made all of the requested changes. Please let me know what I need to do to get the following content removed:

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications. Tagged since November 2010. It is written like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. Tagged since October 2010. Very few or no other articles link to it. Please help introduce links to this page from other articles related to it. Tagged since October 2010. It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since November 2010. It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter. Tagged since October 2010. Sections should be added to this article, to conform with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Tagged since November 2010.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Rbentley9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Thomas DeMark, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 03:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas DeMark

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas DeMark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. VQuakr (talk) 03:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas DeMark

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas DeMark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 17:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas DeMark

The article is written is a way that sounds promotional rather than encyclopedic. It needs to be trimmed down and reliable secondary sources need to be added. Do you have any? (e.g. news articles, etc) ~dee^(talk?) 18:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas DeMark

The article Thomas DeMark has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 18:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI conflict of interest guideline

see also: Wikipedia is not a soapbox and Wikipedia:User pages#What may I not have in my user pages?

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in Thomas DeMark or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 21:40, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas DeMark

Greetings! Thank your for your efforts on Thomas DeMark and your descriptive edit summaries, particularly here. If you are interested in continuing to improve this article, a great next step would be to turn the list of links at the bottom of the page into in-line citations, which will be a big step towards improving the readability of the article. At the same time, we can consider reducing the number of primary sources; the more useful links are to sources about the subject of the article, not by him. Again, welcome! Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. VQuakr (talk) 06:08, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

03:07, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Hi, I need help. I am not sure what else needs to be done to make this Wiki post clear the tags.

On Nov 4th, I met the requests: "ZGreetings! Thank your for your efforts on Thomas DeMark and your descriptive edit summaries, particularly here. If you are interested in continuing to improve this article, a great next step would be to turn the list of links at the bottom of the page into in-line citations, which will be a big step towards improving the readability of the article"

I thought that everything was good after that as the article appeared without any tags, but today I discovered that the tags have persisted. please let me know what else I need to do to clear tags. Thanks. Roderick

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas R. DeMark

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas R. DeMark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 16:50, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas DeMark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas DeMark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas DeMark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 03:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Thomas DeMark

A tag has been placed on Talk:Thomas DeMark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G8, will follow up with editor on their talk page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. VQuakr (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas DeMark

First, I strongly suggest that you avoid posting personal information in a public setting; Wikipedia contains an email system that prevents public disclosure of your email address. Second, I nominated the article for deletion because I did not see secondary sources about this person that would meet the notability requirements at WP:GNG and WP:BIO. If you still disagree that the article should not have been deleted, you could open a discussion at WP:DRV. Please let me know if you have additional questions! VQuakr (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]