User talk:Raziel1975S

February 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Campaigns of Nader Shah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raziel1975S! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Campaigns of Nader Shah, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne perturbes pas du tout je dis la vérité que l'empire Afsharid n'est pas un empire perse mais un empire Turc irannien les afshar viennent du Turkestan ils sont d'origine Turc a ce que je saches pas perses l'armée Afsharid était des Turcs Qizilbash et des kurds les anciennes source Safavid le disent que Nader Raziel1975S (talk) 08:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You've been warned on several occassions not to change sourced content according to your own unsourced POV. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Months long disruption

If I catch you disrupting an article once again you will be reported. It cant be right that you to have cause trouble for several months. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I find it unfair disgusting to block me because I tell the truth especially that the figures in the battle you have no source to approve these figures and you tell me that I am disturbing your incompetent site which has no source nor reference but it suits you to put figures that you come out of nowhere with no source that says the number of soldiers in the battles Raziel1975S (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]