User talk:RazerCrane

Jimmy Page

I have posted at Talk:Jimmy Page about the edit warring and removal of sourced content. You are free to start a reasoned discussion about the merit of the content you are trying to remove, and obtain consensus to remove it. Right now, no such consensus exists. Please refrain from removing sourced content or edit warring, lest your block be extended. Thanks --Spike Wilbury (talk) 03:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of CosmicLegg (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

NW (Talk) 21:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RazerCrane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So, you immediately assume because of similar opinion or interests that I am this user? Your claim has me under 'Likely' being this user. I am not this user, please remove my this tag and block.

Decline reason:

I rechecked; it's confirmed. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 07:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.