Jump to content

User talk:CosmicLegg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, CosmicLegg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Closedmouth (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

I actually don't mind JET

[edit]

So don't know why you have to accuse me of bias. Fact is, well I have a better idea about this than you and the other editors because I see these people adding their own reviews to Wikipedia all the time. When you compare the professional aspect of reviews, how can you even put Strange Glue (which is a self-ran website with basically one reviewer) in the same list as Rolling Stone or Billboard? Please also note that WP:ALBUM states there should be no more than 10 reviews. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 13:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have just told you, I don't mind JET. I won't change the channel on the radio when they come on, I'll occassionaly listen to them on the old iPod, I own a couple of their albums - how else am I meant to tell you? I could not care less about the positive/negative feedback. If anything, I'd be encouraging postivity about an Aussie band which is known worldwide, but no, because we have a policy called Neutral point of view. This is of course subject to the fact that there is Reliable Sources, which these sources are not. I never said anything about illegal - they are perfectly valid, for a casual reader coming across 'their' site, but not Wikipedia, this is an encylcopedia, in ten years time would you like to come across a presumably encyclopedic article which alludes to some amatuer website (or blog) which has been defunct for the past 8 years because the guys who ran it finished college? Anyway, I'm jabbering on, if you wish to receive more opinions on the matter go here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 12:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're a sock, I'll reply here

[edit]

The problem is listed on WP:BLP. None of those sources for the other musicians are reliable, so you should have no problem removing them, provided your edit summary reflects why it can't be included. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 23:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. "insert name here" for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.  GSK (talkevidence) 04:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]