User talk:Rayloeb

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Burns Upton has been accepted

Charles Burns Upton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rayloeb. This is the third time (one two) that you've requested deletion of this page and previously you just requested it back later. Can you make your mind up please? Sam Walton (talk) 14:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop blanking this article. Why do you want it deleted? You've requested it be deleted and restored twice already. Sam Walton (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Rayloeb, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sam Walton (talk) 14:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rayloeb. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Burns Upton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Burns Upton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Burns Upton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]