User talk:Rayhan.phy

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rayhan.phy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page User:Rayhan.phy/sandbox, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Barishal University Physics Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Barishal University Physics Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 21:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal: Rayhan.phy

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rayhan.phy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Bbb23,

I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account for "Abusing multiple accounts." I understand that using multiple accounts is against Wikipedia's policies, and I apologize for any actions that might have led to this conclusion.

I assure you that I did not intend to deceive or disrupt the community. My intention was to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I have read and understood the policies on multiple accounts and sockpuppetry, and I am committed to adhering to these guidelines strictly in the future.

I kindly request you to reconsider the block on my account. I am eager to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive and policy-compliant manner.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Rayhan.phy Rayhan.phy (talk) 04:46, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Chatbot written requests are not considered(100% certain according to GPTzero). Please write your request in your own words without the aid of an AI. Note that unblock requests are to ask for a third party to review the block, but you addressed your comment to Bbb23. If you wish to negotiate with them first, you don't need to format your comment as an unblock request. If you want someone else to review this matter, please make a new request. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.