User talk:Rawna Praveen singh solanki

Speedy deletion nomination of Major Thakur Dalpat Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Major Thakur Dalpat Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EnormityOP (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dewal Pratiharas. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 10:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The content refference and source are deleted from this page by User:Fancy vibēs. He destroy the reliable refference like [1] which states the Dewal Pratihara are Rajput. Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 07:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 22:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because disruptive edits but my aim was not make Disruptive edit I just made small mistakes because I was new to wikipedia and not know many wikipedia policy. Please unblock me to make my mistake and I was graduated you that I will make better edit and not disrupt. Thank you

Decline reason:

This request is barely coherent; if English is not your primary language, you may feel more comfortable editing the Wikipedia of your primary language. To be unblocked, you will need to be able to tell us what was wrong with your edits and what you will do differently. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 09:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The User:Fancy vibēs damage many pages by removed content,source and refference from pages like Dewal Pratiharas,Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, Dalpat Singh (soldier), Thakur Hari Singh,Kana vela (specially he removed Rajput and Ravana Rajputs from those pages to make people fool) .

1.He Vandalism on Wikipedia me without any notice and message on my talk page. He vandalism for my last edit on Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty which is verifiable and releted to the article. My last edit was a word Parihar the word was also used for Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty the refference for this was (here[2]). This user aslo damage Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty by removing the descents like Parihar|pratihar ruler of Nagod, Dewal Pratiharas and many more from this. So i left messages and notice on User:Fancy vibēs (talk page) by using those notice he complete about me in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and I was blocked in the charge of Dispurtive edit . Please unblock me to make my mistake correct and prove myself Right. Thank You.

Decline reason:

No, you will not be unblocked to "make your mistake correct" nor to "prove yourself right". --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 12:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you'll need to remove the "nowiki" tags around the unblock request template to place it correctly. Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 00:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your suggestion and and attention. Thank you♥️ Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The User:Fancy vibēs (bloked user for Sock puppet of User:Anuj Choudhary ror) damaged many pages like Dewal Pratihara(now deleted because of User:Fancy vibēs) ,Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty,Major Dalpat Singh,Thakur Hari Singh and many more (by removing Rajput and Ravana Rajputs from pages) for this add message and notice on User talk:Fancy vibēs by using those notice he complete about me on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and I blocked in the charge of Wikipedia:Disruptive editing . Please unblock me I here only for contribution for example I created page like Dalpat Singh (soldier), Thakur Hari Singh, Dewal Pratihara only public knowledge. Thank you Rawna Praveen singh solanki

Decline reason:

Seee WP:NOTTHEM. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk) 14:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

You may not remove declined block notices while you are still blocked. You have used nowiki tags to break your appeal once again. Cabayi (talk) 16:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for suggestion but I remove declined block notice and other things because I wan unable to edit my Unblock 2 to remove nowiki tags but whatever Thanks for your attention. Thank you Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 16:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, you'll need to edit the page in source code mode, rather than in the VisualEditor mode to be able to place templates correctly without parts of it becoming "nowikied". Also, don't place templates (or double curly brackets in general) in section headings (the equal sign things surrounding a piece of text). Putting two curly brackets around a page name transcludes (i.e. places a mirror copy of) that page's contents onto this page. Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very for your Information and Wish you Happy Diwali.Thank you♥️ Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rawna Praveen singh solanki. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]