User talk:RaviKRana

January 2018

Hello, I'm Intgr. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Checked baggage have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 17:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ravi Kumar Rana, from its old location at User:RaviKRana/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 11:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ravi Kumar Rana (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ravi Kumar Rana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ravi Kumar Rana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam Sailor 11:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, RaviKRana! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sam Sailor 11:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ravi Kumar Rana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ravi Kumar Rana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sam Sailor 12:48, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 12:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the update. I Will keep this in mind for future edits.RaviKRana (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

• And yet you marked even your adding of the above comment as minor. If you are adding content to a page, or if you are adding a reference, it is not a "minor" change and should not be marked as such. Reviewing your visible edits (i.e., all your edits to non-deleted articles), you have marked all of your edits as minor and none of them qualify as minor. If you default to not using that minor edits checkbox, you will be much closer to correct. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Local search engine optimisation. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 18:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello alexf I will keep this in mind but I found it useful information for Local SEO that's why I shared. If there's any problem then let me know. I will remove it. RaviKRana (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC) was related to topic and I thought it will help others.

Delhi Institute of Technology Management moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Delhi Institute of Technology Management, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 11:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Boleyn Delhi Institute of Technology Management college is affiliated with GGSIP University for the session 2018. I tried to share information on GGSIP Page but that page required the article page destination so I created this article by collecting information provided on college website. I tried to enter the website address where originally all information is available.

Am I missing something?

Regards, --RaviKRana (talk) 12:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm A 10 fireplane. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sajjan Kumar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 19:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Keyword stemming moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Keyword stemming, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 08:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

April 2019

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [1] MrOllie (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Was not aware but keep in mind for future edits. I have a question. Are we allowed to add reference from Quora? If yes then how? --RaviKRana (talk) 10:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keyword stemming (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keyword stemming and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Keyword stemming, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Delhi Institute of Technology Management

Hello, RaviKRana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Delhi Institute of Technology Management".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

It's okay I don't want to retrieve as I am not interested to make any edit on wikipedia. RaviKRana (talk) 05:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Keyword stemming concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Keyword stemming, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Kitchen, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [2] MrOllie (talk) 12:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Okay Ban it. I am not interested in making any change or update. It's waste of time anyways.