User talk:RatPack1970
Happy editing
Welcome
[edit]
Welcome RatPack1970!
I'm Md Maruf Parvez, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Maruf Parvez ❯❯❯ Talk 16:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Maruf Parvez ❯❯❯ Talk 16:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Carl Reiner. Name changes must be well-referenced Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]Please see template:Infobox person, it explains the different parameters and defines how each is used. Schazjmd (talk) 21:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- List of The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson episodes
- added links pointing to Anthony Hamilton, Michael Bacon, Living Things and Ian Edwards
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bradley Laise
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bradley Laise, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waddles 🗩 🖉 05:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced edits on David T. Abercrombie
[edit]Hi,
I saw you recently changed the year of death of David T. Abercrombie from 1931 to 1937. However, the 1931 date already had a source in a New York Times obituary. I found another one here (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/18071757/david-thomas-abercrombie), where you can see his gravestone and death certificate, both showing a date of 1931. Why did you change the year to 1937?
Please take more care in the future and only add things that have reliable sources to Wikipedia! Signed: Knuthove (talk) 00:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- In one of my friends YouTube video it said 1937 not 1931. That was what I got. But it turns out je accidentally said the wrong year. RatPack1970 (talk) 04:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Youtube videos are not generally good sources, unless the person in the video is an expert on the topic. A lot of people trust Wikipedia, and a lot of other websites simply copy whatever is on Wikipedia as fact. Adding poorly sourced material that turns out to be false hurts that trust and spreads misinformation. At the very least you should check the existing sources in an article to see if they contradict what you are writing. Here is a short beginners guide to referencing on Wikipedia. I hope you will continue to help improve Wikipedia with well sourced information going forward. Knuthove (talk) 13:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of List of The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson episodes for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson episodes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I before E except after C, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Regan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
DMY to MDY
[edit]Why are you changing these? Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Again, why are you changing the date format? Acroterion (talk) 02:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Us Americans use Month Date, Year sir. Unless you live outside the USA then I understand. If you don't then I dint get why you do this... RatPack1970 (talk) 02:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Excuse me for sounding rude. But I've had a rough day. Also I mea t to type "don't" RatPack1970 (talk) 02:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia, and what “us Americans” do is not universal. Most Europeans use DMY. Don’t change topics pertaining to a European topic without good reason. And don’t lecture other editors about “us Americans.” And I’m one of “us Americans. I’m sorry you’ve had a bad day. Don’t use it as an excuse to edit-war over inappropriate changes. Acroterion (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 02:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)