User talk:Rasvihari mishra

November 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Hindu temple seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vindhyavasini, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of तुमैन मे माॅ विन्ध्यवासिनी,ञिवेणी आदि कई

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on तुमैन मे माॅ विन्ध्यवासिनी,ञिवेणी आदि कई requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Liance. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vindhyavasini have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tumen have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tumen was changed by Rasvihari mishra (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850301 on 2021-02-23T05:03:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Public Rasvihari mishra (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tumen. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tumen was changed by Rasvihari mishra (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860721 on 2021-02-24T12:10:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tumen Rasvihari mishra (talk) 14:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop overwriting the disambiguation page

Tumen is a disambiguation page. If you want to create a new article, please select a name with an appropriate disambiguation term. In this case, Tumen, Ashoknagar or Tumen, Madhya Pradesh might work. older ≠ wiser 11:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tumen Village moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tumen Village, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tumen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 08:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tumen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FF-11 (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tumen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 07:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Serols (talk) 07:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tumen Village

Hello, Rasvihari mishra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tumen Village, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tumen Village

Hello, Rasvihari mishra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tumen Village".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me blocked ip user please unblock

Help me blocked ip user please unblock Rasvihari mishra (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]