User talk:Raspberryboujee

Welcome!

Hello, Raspberryboujee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Amckern (talk) 08:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C'mon C'mon (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Red link for film producer Tom Ackerley

Hi Raspberryboujee,

you removed the red links to Tom Ackerley which I had placed in the article Margot Robbie. I have reverted that based on the guidelines at WP:REDLINK, especially paragraph 3:

In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a title that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there is no existing article, or article section, under any name. Only remove red links if Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject.

Tom Ackerley is certainly notable enough for an article, and unless you vehemently disagree with that assessment, please don't remove the red links. They encourage the creation of such an article, and help with working lists such as:

Wikipedia:Most-wanted articles
Wikipedia:Requested articles
Wikipedia:WIR/REDLIST (This one is focused on women, but you get the general point.)

All the Best from --Sprachraum (talk) 22:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margot Robbie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hi Raspberryboujee! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Margot Robbie that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Bettydaisies (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Margot Robbie. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 17:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joaquin Phoenix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gainesville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Margot Robbie

Hi Raspberryboujee! I've noticed you've reverted my edits a few times, most recently here, without providing an edit summary. I'd like to have a discussion with you about why you think this image of Robbie alongside Tarantino is preferable to a solo image of the subject at an event for the same film. Personally, I think that the solo image better fits her biographical article, and is more flattering (both in dress and in angle). I'm curious to hear what you think.--Bettydaisies (talk) 07:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Bieber

Hi, I understand your point of view in mentioning "Stuck with U" in Bieber's introduction. But the others are mentioned because they accompany a notable achievement. The song is his sixth number-one btw. I removed it to minimise the size of the intro. It is still mentioned in the 2020-21 section. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Beemer03 (talk) 09:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm Golden. I noticed that you recently removed content from Timothée Chalamet without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 14:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabby Windey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adam DiMarco

I have moved your article attempt into Draft space. You should not try to create an article when a Draft already exists in Draftspace – you should work on the Draft and move that into Mainspace when ready. Please check to make sure there isn't a preexisiting Draft article before trying to create an article. I have moved the original Draft article, which had precedence, into Mainspace in place of yours. Feel free to merge content from your Draft into the article now. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Paul Mescal, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. This edit does not specify which source tells us Mescal is set to make his West End debut. Please be more careful in the future. KyleJoan^talk 02:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Young English Actor. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 19:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Paul Mescal

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paul Mescal. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. KyleJoan^talk 14:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kyle Joan. I'm not sure how to use the talk page. I hope this reaches you. Sorry for the disruption to Paul Mescal's page. I didn't know it was that serious. I won't edit it anymore unless there is new information.

Many of your edits have contained serious issues, but you don't seem to care. This edit from a week ago fails the verifiability policy. You were just now blindly reverting without any explanation, including in summaries, where you expressed qualms that the edits didn't even address. You clearly know this talk page exists but choose to disregard other users' concerns about your editing. The first notice on here contains a link with information about how to use the talk page, so it might be helpful to review this entire page and consider what others have taken the time to write. KyleJoan^talk 15:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kyle Joan. I have known about the talk page's existence, but I hadn't read the link with information. I'll do that now. Thanks for the help and I'll try to do better in my future edits. Raspberryboujee (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Faist

Regarding this edit, the source does not verify Faist's involvement in the play as his West End debut. Please exercise extra care in adhering to the verifiability policy. Should the policy failures continue, I believe a WP:ANI report is in order. Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 13:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for the information Raspberryboujee (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rami Malek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]