User talk:Rangreza

July 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Teefa In Trouble, from its old location at User:Rangreza/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 10:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teefa In Trouble has been accepted

Teefa In Trouble, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jupitus Smart 10:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rangreza, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rangreza! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
2,885	Married... with Children (talk)	Add sources
19	Rodina (TV series) (talk)	Add sources
216	John Goldwyn (talk)	Add sources
41	Steven Cole (talk)	Add sources
15	J. D. Hall (talk)	Add sources
179	Baldwin Hills, Los Angeles (talk)	Add sources
65	Dink, the Little Dinosaur (talk)	Cleanup
76	Kidd Video (talk)	Cleanup
59	El Zorro, la espada y la rosa (talk)	Cleanup
230	Science Ninja Team Gatchaman (talk)	Expand
376	Holy water (talk)	Expand
27	Left Turn Ahead (talk)	Expand
138	Noble House (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
39	The Popeye Show (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
80	The Twisted Tales of Felix the Cat (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
40	Dub localization (talk)	Merge
9	The Nurses (ABC TV series) (talk)	Merge
558	Helicopter parent (talk)	Merge
441	Popeye (film) (talk)	Wikify
526	Just Shoot Me! (talk)	Wikify
54	Pole Position (TV series) (talk)	Wikify
3	James Elward (talk)	Orphan
10	Hip Hop Shop (talk)	Orphan
19	The Mother-Daughter Book Club (talk)	Orphan
8	KYYO (talk)	Stub
107	Seoul Institute of the Arts (talk)	Stub
18	The Bold Caballero (talk)	Stub
20	Hrach Titizian (talk)	Stub
10	Lauren Gussis (talk)	Stub
3	Carlos Macedo (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rangreza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by having same IP address 182.182.66.134 as that User but it's not mine and you can ask also from CheckUser. I know I will not be unblocked but instead I want to request if you trust me. Thankyou

Decline reason:

It's not just your IP address. There's other technical evidence, not to mention the fact that you've been editing the same articles. The block is a checkuser block and it strongly appears appropriate. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rangreza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want evidence because our emails are different, than how can you blame?

Decline reason:

You don't understand. We do have technical evidence that this account and several others (like User:International Editor Shah) are being operated by the same person. The behavioral evidence is consistent with this finding too. If you want to be unblocked, you have to explain that situation. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rangreza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For administrators who want to listen the truth, yes I am the same user who had created many sockpuppets, but in way, you are also wrong, that after this account I have created no another account and I want to wait until January. Seriously. But editors, who have said behavior I think you think are mine. You might think "same behaviour, same account". Haha. They are not mine and I agree to WP: Standard Offer and I am waiting for it to be done very soon. Thankyou.

Decline reason:

We don't unblock sockpuppet accounts. You can only be unblocked from your original account (International Editor Shah. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.