User talk:Randy Langi

Randy Langi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Randy Langi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Prophet Dr. David Edward Owuor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prophet Dr. David Edward Owuor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 11:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Randy Langi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Repentance & Holiness". The reason given for Repentance & Holiness's block is: "Improper username".

Blocking administrator: Brookie (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: The original block was for an inappropriate username, and you have corrected that error. As a result, I lifted the block. Note that your contributions have been totally inappropriate, though. Please make sure you don't contribute further until you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yamla (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be clear. You have a conflict of interest with regards to Prophet Dr. David Edward Owuor and must abide by our policy, WP:COI. That basically means you are not permitted to write about that subject directly. If someone without a conflict of interest creates that article, you are welcome to suggest edits on the article's talk page, after disclosing your conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 14:55, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Randy Langi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

you unblocked me and then re-blocked again without any notification or reason. I have gone through the wikipedia policy and have tried to redo the article in adherence to the same, but my sandbox shows me that it is impossible for me to create any page. I am almost losing hope

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; as pointed out below, you are not blocked directly. If you are unable to edit, it may be that another account operating from your address is blocked, and triggering what we call the 'autoblock'. If so, please follow the instructions when you try to edit, so we can find that block. Yamla (talk) 19:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not blocked. You are able to post under this account. Just please do not resort to writing articles about the chap with whom, t has ben suggested, you have a COI. Cheers! Happy editing. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 19:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Owuor

Please do not move draft articles into main space without submitting them for review. I have moved the article back to Draft:David Owuor. Please submit this for review in the usual way and let other experienced editors judge whether it is acceptable. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned you. You have an undisclosed conflict of interest regarding Dr. David Owuor. Do not perform any more edits until you read and understand and are willing to abide by WP:COI. Any further violations will result in a reblock. --Yamla (talk) 23:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you have refused to do this, you have been blocked indefinitely. Any administrator is welcome to unblock you if they are convinced you have read and understood WP:COI and have declared your conflict of interest and agreed to refrain from directly editing any article about Dr. David Owuor. --Yamla (talk) 23:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David Owuor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:David Owuor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 06:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]