User talk:Randelearcilla

Welcome!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Randelearcilla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Randele A. Arcilla 12:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 13:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Randelearcilla! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Mayoyao Ridge may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] from the capturing the combined U.S. and Filipino troops in [[Kiangan]], [[Mountain Province]] (now. Ifugao]] on [[September 02]], [[1945]] until the aftermath of [[World War II]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Cavite (1945) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of the Filipino soldiers under the [[Philippine Commonwealth Army]] and [Philippine Constabulary]] and the American soldiers and pilots under the [[United States Army]] and [[United States Army Air

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of equipment of the Philippine Commonwealth Army

added links pointing to Mortars, 12 gauge and Service

Philippine Commonwealth Army

added a link pointing to Mortars

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Randelearcilla, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Randelearcilla! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former military equipment of the Philippines

Category:Former military equipment of the Philippines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your text formatting in articles.

Please be mindful of the formatting guideline on the use of capitals: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. There's no point in Making Everything Capitals, as someone will have to turn them into lower case later. Also, you should look to keep your section titles shorter (see MOS:SECTIONS for the detail). These are rules to keep Wikipedia more readable as well as consistent in appearance, it helps if you can follow them too. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of equipment of the Philippine Commonwealth Army, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mortars and Bolo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Guila-Guila

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Battle of Guila-Guila, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Compostela, Cebu. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Howdy. You've recently created a handful of article related to the Pacific Campaign of World War II, but those articles have been brought up at the Military history Project's talkpage as possible candidates for merging or deleting due to percieved issues with the material. Given that we are mandated to assume good faith with regards to editors and material added here, I'm leaving this message to invite you to join this discussion, which is currently taking place here. TomStar81 (Talk) 18:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Randelearcilla, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Battle of Piis has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. The majority of the article is cut-and-pasted from this website. Thank you. Mogism (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Batangas (1945)

added a link pointing to Bicol

Battle of Kiangan

added a link pointing to Walter Kruger

Japanese Conflict and Insurgency in Luzon (1942-45)

added a link pointing to Davao

Japanese Conflict and Insurgency in Visayas (1942-45)

added a link pointing to James Cushing

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crusader tank

You added the Crusader tank to the List of weapons of the Philippine Commonwealth Army. I know of no usage of the Crusader by any Philippine contingent. If you have a source for this, you should add it. Unsourced material may be removed at anytime under wikipedia policies and guidelines Wikipedia:Verifiability which says "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed". If I remove this entry are you going to out it back again without providing a source?GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating a series of hoax articles (such as articles claiming that the Australian Army landed in the Philippines in 1945 and suffered thousands of fatalities when no Australian Army units fought there at all), and adding hoaxes to other articles. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 11:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From further reviewing your edits, I'm pretty sure that you're the latest incarnation of a long-running vandal with a history of adding fictional material concerning the military history of the Philippines as well. Nick-D (talk) 11:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Randelearcilla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Randele A. Arcilla 01:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As this is the third time you've made an empty unblock request, I've removed your ability to do so. Kuru (talk) 03:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Military Operations of the Philippine Commonwealth Army

Template:Campaignbox Military Operations of the Philippine Commonwealth Army has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]