Jump to content

User talk:Ramseym

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Digital evolution group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --SquidSK (1MClog) 19:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --SquidSK (1MClog) 19:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --SquidSK (1MClog) 20:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Digital Evolution Group, LLP., to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall talk 22:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

help me == Digital Evolution Group, LLP. ==

How is my entry different from this already approved entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VML%2C_Inc. Please provide insight on why my entry isn't allowed?

Please don't create pages to ask for help. But I don't know the answer to your question because the VML article has been deleted as has the DEG one so I can't see either one. But judging by the above, your article was not really like an encyclopaedia entry (which should contain good and bad points about a company, for example) and was more like advertising which is not allowed here. Please check these links to find out more Spam and notability for more information. --Slp1 22:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the article on VML, Inc. does exist--the provided link was simply a bad one. --Finngall talk 22:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The question is valid--unfortunately, comparing one article to another can be an exercise in madness, since anybody can create or edit anything and not all articles get the editing attention they deserve. So just because an article exists does not mean it's been given any Official Seal Of Approval. For this reason, using the existence of article X as a justification for the existence of article Y doesn't carry a great deal of weight. In the case of the cited article, yes, it does read like an advertisement and is badly in need of a rewrite at the very least, and I have marked it as such, but there's enough content in there to be salvageable. In your case, all you've done is a copy and paste from the "About Us" portion of the website, which brings up not only spam issues, but copyright issues as well. All articles should be written from a neutral point of view, and anyone connected with the company should tread veeeeeery carefully in any case for conflict of interest reasons. --Finngall talk 22:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit conflict

Thanks for your message. Yes, it is a bad example! You could certainly start again, but if you are connected to the company then you should read this link [[1]] especially the part about reviewing your motives and don't making a page to promote your company or product. It is better to wait till the company is important enough to have somebody else write the article. Good luck!Slp1 22:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Digital Evolution Group

[edit]

Why did you delete my page? Is as much relevant as this page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VML%2C_Inc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.160.99 (talkcontribs)

It was deleted because it was written like advertising. Wikipedia does not accept such articles. Thank you. --Fang Aili talk 13:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]