User talk:Rakvoggu

Rakvoggu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rakvoggu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to C. N. R. Rao— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at C. N. R. Rao. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:52, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to C. N. R. Rao

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, C. N. R. Rao, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Nirmala Sitharaman

Hello, I'm Sarvatra. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nirmala Sitharaman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine. That is reality. Honourable minister should realise. Others like us also honourable.

That is fine. That is reality. Honourable minister should realise. Others like us also honourable. Rakvoggu (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

She should not show favouritism and spoil others career, business opportunities using power and contacts she earned through it with money and career for her and other family.

She should not show favouritism and spoil others career, business opportunities using power and contacts she earned through it with money and career for her and other family. Rakvoggu (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Nirmala Sitharaman

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nirmala Sitharaman, you may be blocked from editing. Please adhere to wikipedia policies about Biographies of living persons. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 16:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s looks like you are kid. Start making edits only in the area of your expertise not to disrupt somebody else’s broader expertise. don’t make silly comments or to show authority on some body.

First read Wikipedia foundation principles and how it works but not to edit silly silly topics and get points to take away somebody else hours of work which of credible in nature. You should not take way credibly refered topics and only thing you can do is Add ons or just to add condradict the statements made. It looks like you never know about references and citations along with alalysis and insights that follows. First read about research methodology.

It’s looks like you are kid. Start making edits only in the area of your expertise not to disrupt somebody else’s broader expertise. don’t make silly comments or to show authority on some body.

It’s looks like you are kid. Start making edits only in the area of your expertise not to disrupt somebody else’s broader expertise. don’t make silly comments or to show authority on some body. Rakvoggu (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First read Wikipedia foundation principles and how it works but not to edit silly silly topics and get points to take away somebody else hours of work which of credible in nature. You should not take way credibly refered topics and only thing you can do is Add ons or just to add condradict the statements made. It looks like you never know about references and citations along with alalysis and insights that follows. First read about research methodology.

First read Wikipedia foundation principles and how it works but not to edit silly silly topics and get points to take away somebody else hours of work which of credible in nature. You should not take way credibly refered topics and only thing you can do is Add ons or just to add condradict the statements made. It looks like you never know about references and citations along with alalysis and insights that follows. First read about research methodology. Rakvoggu (talk) 17:05, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XenonIn Media (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XenonIn Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:XenonIn Media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India.

Wikipedia might have founded on good spirit inspite of bad planing and intentions. It became coordinated or official of good route to arm twist or defame lot of people. Now it became too much with funding.

I just want to demonstrate with my 3 months of editing or creating content here. It’s not intentional.

Wikipedia editing is biased and going worse.

No body cares here for Wikipedia here. I have intentions to further here. Remove biography and company information from Wikipedia.

From Intelligence Beauru of India (IB) Cheif and Global Head & Coordinator, Central Intelligence ( CI )

SamHolt6 (talk) 06:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop editing others pages by you silly friends related tactics. It is a company page. Do you take money or bribe to accept or reject Wikipedia articles directly or indirectly or by taking several personal favours continuously with group of people around the world

Just stop editing others pages by you silly friends related tactics. It is a company page.

Do you take money or bribe to accept or reject Wikipedia articles directly or indirectly or for personal favors. Rakvoggu (talk) 06:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rakvoggu: Hello! In a form of answer, no, I do not take bribes or exchange favors in return for reviews; I am unpaid, but pseudo-appointed by my peers. As for your draft, I did not feel it is sufficiently sourced to be allowed into the mainspace. I recommend you read WP:MFA and WP:NCORP so that you can establish a better grasp on Wikipedia policy. Good luck in your future editing.--SamHolt6 (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Rakvoggu. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Stop attacking other editors. And if you want to discuss edits to a article then do so on the article's talk page, not here. Meters (talk) 06:48, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears from your username that you are the managing director of the company you are writing about in Draft:XenonIn Media. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID.

And wrt your edits to Nirmala Sitharaman you should read WP:EW and WP:BLP Meters (talk) 06:57, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't remove the review from the draft. As the notice says, "do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted." Meters (talk) 07:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who cares and replies to idiotic comments like yours. We always here to help you in educating what is personal and official.

Who cares and replies to idiotic comments like yours. We always here to help you in educating what is personal and official. Rakvoggu (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XenonIn Media (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XenonIn Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:XenonIn Media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India.

Wikipedia might have founded on good spirit inspite of bad planing and intentions. It became coordinated or official of good route to arm twist or defame lot of people. Now it became too much with funding.

I just want to demonstrate with my 3 months of editing or creating content here. It’s not intentional.

Wikipedia editing is biased and going worse.

No body cares here for Wikipedia here. I have intentions to further here. Remove biography and company information from Wikipedia.

From Intelligence Beauru of India (IB) Cheif and Global Head & Coordinator, Central Intelligence ( CI )

Why did you reject with out doing proper search on the topics or not even clicking on the link. it is a company page which offers legitimate services.

It looks like there is a international ring which does fraud with Wikipedia company pages for stoping from publishing with out giving proper explanation. There is nothing to reject here. It is a proper consulting company page. Wikipedia keeps defamation pages about individuals, officials, companies and governments with out taking individuals permission even in biography pages also. No individuals keep defamation things about them in public.

Why did you reject with out doing proper search on the topics or not even clicking on the link. it is a company page which offers legitimate services. Rakvoggu (talk) 09:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XenonIn Media (January 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 10:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s is a service whic stupid persons who use acronyms as user names with out proper profile or knowledge about content will reject this. One secind editors won’t work

It’s is a service whic stupid persons who use acronyms as user names with out proper profile or knowledge about content will reject this. One secind editors won’t work With out knowledge in services XenonIn Media StartUp offers.

Stupidity or stupidness increases with time for you people. Rakvoggu (talk) 10:49, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XenonIn Media (January 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 11:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India.

Wikipedia might have founded on good spirit inspite of bad planing and intentions. It became coordinated or official of good route to arm twist or defame lot of people. Now it became too much with funding.

I just want to demonstrate with my 3 months of editing or creating content here. It’s not intentional.

Wikipedia editing is biased and going worse.

No body cares here for Wikipedia here. I have intentions to further here. Remove biography and company information from Wikipedia.

From Intelligence Beauru of India (IB) Cheif and Global Head & Coordinator, Central Intelligence ( CI )

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. David.moreno72 11:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who cares and funds Wikipedia with this kind of fraud editorial

Rakvoggu (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XenonIn Media (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I was not able to find any significant coverage of the subject in reliable secondary sources. Most of the cited sources to not refer to the subject of the article, and so are not useful in demonstrating notability or supporting any of the assertions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XenonIn Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:XenonIn Media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GirthSummit _(blether) 11:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India.

Wikipedia might have founded on good spirit inspite of bad planing and intentions. It became coordinated or official of good route to arm twist or defame lot of people. Now it became too much with funding.

I just want to demonstrate with my 3 months of editing or creating content here. It’s not intentional.

Wikipedia editing is biased and going worse.

No body cares here for Wikipedia here. I have intentions to further here. Remove biography and company information from Wikipedia.

From Intelligence Beauru of India (IB) Cheif and Global Head & Coordinator, Central Intelligence ( CI )

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India.

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India.

Wikipedia might have founded on good spirit inspite of bad planing and intentions. It became coordinated or official of good route to arm twist or defame lot of people. Now it became too much with funding.

I just want to demonstrate with my 3 months of editing or creating content here. It’s not intentional.

Wikipedia editing is biased and going worse.

No body cares here for Wikipedia here. I have intentions to further here. Remove biography and company information from Wikipedia.

From Intelligence Beauru of India (IB) Cheif and Global Head & Coordinator, Central Intelligence ( CI )

Rakvoggu (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India. Wikipedia might have founded on good spirit inspite of bad planing and intentions. It became coordinated or official of good route to arm twist or defame lot of people. Now it became too much with funding. I just want to demonstrate with my 3 months of editing or creating content here. It’s not intentional. Wikipedia editing is biased and going worse. No body cares here for Wikipedia here. I have intentions to further here. Remove biography and company information from Wikipedia. From Intelligence Beauru of India (IB) Cheif and Global Head & Coordinator, Central Intelligence ( CI )

It looks like Wikipedia or editors are harassing me on several grounds for last several years may be from 2007 2008. I will do everything to stop giving location information about the users who visit Wikipedia. More dangerous is giving the persons who edits the document or who creates initially. I hope your servers are not there in India.

Wikipedia might have founded on good spirit inspite of bad planing and intentions. It became coordinated or official of good route to arm twist or defame lot of people. Now it became too much with funding.

I just want to demonstrate with my 3 months of editing or creating content here. It’s not intentional.

Wikipedia editing is biased and going worse.

No body cares here for Wikipedia here. I have intentions to further here. Remove biography and company information from Wikipedia.

From Intelligence Beauru of India (IB) Cheif and Global Head & Coordinator, Central Intelligence ( CI ) Rakvoggu (talk) 12:44, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rakvoggu; you are invited to participate.--SamHolt6 (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am ok, I can participate. It is necessary to maintain things like Wikipedia. U can’t ensure that every body edits have neutral intentions.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rakvoggu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Sathupalli, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. David.moreno72 06:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I might have to create my own Wikipedia and pay salary to others who input the information. There is nothing like an advertisement there. I think you miss understood. Those are there for long time. Sorry. I have no intentions to edit or create pages in Wikipedia. This is not a oath.

Ok, I might have to create my own Wikipedia and pay salary to others who input the information. There is nothing like an advertisement there. I think you miss understood. Those are there for long time. Sorry. I have no intentions to edit or create pages in Wikipedia. This is not a oath. Rakvoggu (talk) 11:45, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I noticed that in this edit to Sathupalli, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 22:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sathupalli. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 22:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sathupalli. Wikipelli ^Talk 22:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XenonIn Media

Hello, Rakvoggu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "XenonIn Media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheTrainNoch (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]