User talk:Rajtress

Recent edit to Bharata Natyam

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bharata Natyam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajeswari Paled Tress (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rajtress, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajeswari Paled Tress (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajeswari Paled Tress (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajeswari Paled Tress (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Please see previous notes and search Wiki for other biographies for examples of what is needed. More importantly, I don't see this person as fulfilling the requirements of WP:BIO. Before resubmitting, these notability requirements must be fulfilled.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Draft: Rajeswari Paled Tress. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Draft: Rajeswari Paled Tress, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Repeatedly resubmitting a draft without addressing the original review comment, the need for footnotes, is tendentious editing and may result in deletion of the draft or in a warning that you may be blocked. Ask for advice at the Teahouse rather than persistently trying to push an inadequate draft through in the hope that a reviewer overlooks the missing foonotes, or overlooks the need for reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress

Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Rajeswari Paled Tress during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]