User talk:Rajeevkh14

Welcome!

Hello, Rajeevkh14, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Education Service

I did not write the article and I have no opinion on the revival of the IES, although I would point out that the cited document does include the wording: The State will endeavour to implement the recommendations of earlier policies of 1968 and 1986/92 for the creation of an Indian Education Service (IES), which is reiterated herein too. The IES will be an all India service with HRD as the cadre controlling authority. But you must not add contentious claims, as you did about discrimination, without clear sourcing. Continuing to do so will result in your being blocked. -- Necrothesp (talk) 07:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The word Indian Education Services has been used in the draft. The use of the word doesn't mean that it is related to the old system. Does the draft that you are referring to, mentions that the Government is planning to base it on IES system of British/ or any year mentioned.. The draft mentions that IES is in continuation on NEP 1968. You are yourself misinterpreting it and without understanding corelating things and when I am trying to correct it, you are threatening to block me.

As for the claims of discrimination, please find the reference. The Life and Work of Sir Jagadis C. Bose: An Indian Pioneer of Science, By Prof. Patrick Geddes. Pp. xii + 259. (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1920.) page 35. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagadish_Chandra_Bose

The article does not say it has anything to do with the old system. It merely says it uses the name. I am not misinterpreting it, since I did not write it. The reason I threatened to block you had nothing to do with the IES revival, as I have already pointed out. Wikipedia needs sourcing for contentious claims. You readded it after I had pointed this out, but did not mention it in your edit summary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Revolutionary in the garb of a Scientist

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Revolutionary in the garb of a Scientist, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Prafulla Chandra Ray. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Prafulla Chandra Ray, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dunutubble (talk) 18:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Rajeevkh14/sandbox

Hello, Rajeevkh14. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Rajeevkh14/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Rajeevkh14/sandbox

Hello, Rajeevkh14. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]