User talk:RajFilmBuff

RajFilmBuff, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RajFilmBuff! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RajFilmBuff. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:12, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Your recent editing history at Sara Ali Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mifter (talk) 19:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"543 crore"

Hi there, re: this edit, if you have an opinion on how the 2.0 budget should be presented in the infobox, there is an open Request for Comment at Talk:2.0_(film)#RfC. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2.0 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama

It is not just a site, but a news source and it's own wikipedia page is italicized. Kindly check this next time before making an edit and change all similar edits. I am aman goyal (talk) 20:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change this again. Read the guidelines. I am aman goyal (talk) 20:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject India/The 2000 Challenge (Indian cinema)

Hi there, Raj. Seeing your work on 2.0, I was hoping if you would be interested in joining this challenge as we improve articles related to Indian cinema. Do let me know if you wish to by adding your name in the list of contestants and adding the names after the articles you have significantly contributed to (like 2.0 for instance). Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 06:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Count me in. RajFilmBuff (talk) 08:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raj, do you work mainly on Tamil film related articles? Do you think there is anything more worth adding to this article created by me? Any words Ssven2? --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, I am usually around all Indian film articles that are in the news. The article is interesting, never heard of the topic before. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to term it as a stock character as compared to trope? Perhaps you could copy Baradwaj Rangan's quote to a new section titled History and paraphrase the quote in the lead? You could use this article somewhere too, if you haven't already taken note of it. RajFilmBuff (talk) 08:33, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah ali Khan

hi Raj, regarding this edit, I think the article was updated based on your talk page request. so instead of removing it entirely the more appropriate thing to do was to mark it as answered=yes, with a comment that someone took care of it. You found those problems and you should get the credit on the talk page. however I leave the decision to revert or not to you. my comment here was just to make you aware about another way to handle it. regards--DBig Xrayᗙ 14:57, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, didn't figure that out. Thanks DBigXray. RajFilmBuff (talk) 16:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you are welcome --DBig Xrayᗙ 18:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Rush922(talk) 12:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]