User talk:Rain and Keet

Rain and Keet, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rain and Keet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dylan McEvoy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dylan McEvoy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bacon McDouble

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bacon McDouble, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yufitran (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1969 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1969 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1969 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1970 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1970 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1970 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1971 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1971 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1971 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Jacksons TV Performances 1979 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Jacksons TV Performances 1979 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jacksons TV Performances 1979 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Jacksons TV Performances 1977 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Jacksons TV Performances 1977 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jacksons TV Performances 1977 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Jacksons TV Performances 1976 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Jacksons TV Performances 1976 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jacksons TV Performances 1976 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1975 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1975 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1975 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1976 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1976 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1976 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your pages are unsourced

Xx236 (talk) 11:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1972

Hello Rain and Keet,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jackson 5 TV Performances 1972 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 11:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1974

Hello Rain and Keet,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jackson 5 TV Performances 1974 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 11:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1972 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1972 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1972 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 07:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1973 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1973 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1973 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 07:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackson 5 TV Performances 1974 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson 5 TV Performances 1974 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1974 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 07:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian Orellana has sex with Elizabeth Stivala

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Christian Orellana has sex with Elizabeth Stivala, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Savonneux (talk) 04:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Cure MTV Unplugged

The article The Cure MTV Unplugged has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced; nothing to indicate why this particular MTV Unplugged concert is notable enough to have its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Cahk (talk) 09:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Christian Orellana has sex with Elizabeth Stivala, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cahk (talk) 09:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saints in Art for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saints in Art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints in Art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 07:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to prevent this from being deleted then I would suggest that you provide some reliably sourced general content about saints in art, rather than have the article go straight into a list of individual saints and how they have been depicted in art. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't continue to ignore the deletion discussion, which is linked above. We already have an article on this topic, called Saint symbolism, so you would do much better to add any useful content to that article rather than continuing to expand this duplicate article on the same subject. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Saints in Art

added links pointing to Ring, Palm, Crown, Shears, Platter and Lamb

Jackson 5 TV Performances 1976

added a link pointing to One Day In Your Life

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saints in Art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, HIStory World Tour, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 11:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lifespans of Parrot Species for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lifespans of Parrot Species is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifespans of Parrot Species until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 07:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lifespans of Parrot Species. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about your articles

Dear Rain and Keet,

You should have noticed that all your articles have been nominated for deletion. Main reason for that is that your articles look like copy and past creations, lacking notability and sources.

It is absolutely no fun to shoot articles down but your production is just not up to the required standard. Please, can you improve that standard by providing more clear texts and most important: sources. Tell the world where you got your information, as detailed as possible. Don't worry about the exact form, there is help available. The Banner talk 13:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fisherman's basket

The article Fisherman's basket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a wiktionary-style definition with zero sense of time, place, etc.

Don't doubt it exists, have eaten it myself, but not seeing enough coverage of this as "a thing" to justify a WP article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]