User talk:Raif2007

October 2019

Hello, I'm Kinetic37. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Netherlands have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. kinetic37_talk 16:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying-and-pasting large blocks of text into articles

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But i just edited important facts Raif2007 (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And stop threaten me because there is no right to block my because i am using important Information so you don't have the right to do so Raif2007 (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And i don't distrupt Wikipedia because unfortunately using important Information

Raif2007 (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you make a similar edit again, you will discover that I do indeed have the right to block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ohitsjamie

I am sorry Ohitsjamie could you please unblock me i promise i am not gonna ever edit any uneccesary text if would you could correct me and i dont re- do or re-edit the history of the page. I am sorry If i do re-do it without the purpose you could block and there is bo chance anymore Please give me the last chance and unblock me in all pages where you blocked me please i promise not to do and edit uneccesary text Raif2007 (talk) 19:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raif2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That I should be unblocked an get a last chance and that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead I will try and be a good user for wikipedia and a last chance is required to proof that I don't do ever again what i did

Decline reason:

This doesn't even mention your abuse of multiple accounts. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raif2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason is that before i was blocked i did not know that i distrupt or abuse wikipedia and multiple accounts and now i really do and the block was not actually a punishment for me it was actually a teaching lesson for me so now i apologize and i state that learned that i would be more carefull and not distrupting wikipedia but please like said i need to be unblocked to proof that do not do it ever again and i learned a lesson about this block — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raif2007 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, you say that before [you were] blocked [you] did not know that [you] distrupt or abuse wikipedia. This is obviously false. You were warned several times, here on this page, to stop, yet you persisted in disrupting Wikipedia. Also, you first said that you created 2 or 3 accounts, but then you revealed only one username, and that account does not even exist (see User:fireguy-2020). You have to list all accounts you created and tell us why you did it. You keep saying that creating different accounts has nothing to do with [your] block, but you were blocked for abusing multiple accounts. This means that you are not even able to understand the reason for your block. Because of all this, I can't accept this unblock request. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed the unblock requests, as you had put the new one inside the old one. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Raif2007, please provide a comprehensive list of all accounts you have created, and the reason(s) for doing so. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•Actually I created 2 or 3 accounts and it does not have to do something with my block Raif2007 (talk) 12:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raif2007, Please list exactly the accounts you created and why. These extra accounts have much to do with your block, as your block was for abusing multiple accounts. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 11:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•I maked one account called fireguy-2020 at this time but it was maked on another device and has nothing to do with my block. Otherwise i maked no accounts

And now you are evading your block again, attempting to make a very similar edit to this one. You've pretty much torpedoed your chances of getting unblocked anytime soon. See WP:STANDARDOFFER. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But hey what did i do wrong because i added Information and if i distrupt i am super sorry.Please could i get a last chance and if distrupt again then i am not going to be unblocked ever please, please i didn't know that please😫.Please last chance🙏🙏 Raif2007 (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Continuing to evade your block while asking to be unblocked is not a sound strategy. Talk page access revoked; see WP:STANDARDOFFER. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]