User talk:Raghuveer Aavula

Raghuveer Aavula, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Raghuveer Aavula! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Allu Arjun, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rahul Sipligunj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rahul BB Telugu.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rahul BB Telugu.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Noel Sean, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Viampira (talk) 11:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rahul Sipligunj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nani (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Alia Bhatt, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Begoon 12:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Captalisation and wikilinking

Hi there, re: this edit, there are a few problems with it. Firstly, we don't need to add duplicate Wikilinks for Hyderabad and India, since the links are already there. Also, we don't link to major geographical locations, like India.

Note also that occupations are not proper nouns, so they should not be capitalised. We don't call the Plumber, we call the plumber. So "Actor, Producer, Television Presenter, Assistant Director" is incorrect, where "Actor, producer, television presenter, assistant director" would be correct. Actor is capitalised because it is at the beginning of the sentence, per normal grammar rules. We also don't need wikilnks for these words, since they are common words/concepts. It would be appreciated if you'd please adhere to WP:OVERLINK moving forward. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Varun Sandesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not link to nations in infobox

Hi there, re: this, please do not link to nations in the infobox. See Template:Infobox person instructions. Also, please don't add duplicate wikilinks. See WP:OVERLINK. Excessive links just confuse readers and make it unlikely they'll click on anything. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 12:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited K. Raghavendra Rao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Krishna Chaitanya (lyricist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arijit Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Telangana Board of Secondary Education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nampally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble with capitalisation?

Re: this, I explained to you in December that words like "television" are not capitalised. Why did you make this erroneous edit again? Maybe you need a refresher in basic rules of English capitalisation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
It seems that you have never used a summary, ever. Give it a try, it's useful to you as well as other editors. 220 of ^Borg 08:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from University of Hyderabad. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to University of Hyderabad, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 13:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Film film film

Hi there, re: this and this and similar, I'm unclear why you are adding repetitious language. In both of those sentences, before you edited them, it was fairly clear that these people are film actors.

Nidhhi Agerwal ... is an Indian actress and dancer who appears in Bollywood and Telugu films.

Samantha Akkineni ... is an Indian actress who has established a career in the Telugu and Tamil film industries

Isn't it abundently clear in both examples that the subjects are film actors? Are you just not reading the entire sentence when you add these? Whatever the case, we don't need the repetitious language, please. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Please stop adding/changing dates contrary to WP:DATEFORMAT as you did at Telangana ‎and Andhra Pradesh - we only use numbers, 1, 2, 3, etc, not ordinals 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)‎[reply]

July 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. El_C 15:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. El_C 11:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HDFC Bank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Komaram Bheem district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asifabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not using edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ranga Reddy district does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You have removed sourced content without proper explanation which may be interpreted as vandalism. Please use edit summaries after you make any such edits -- Ab207 (talk) 12:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You can see your usage of edit summary: here. I'll do it for you, if you are too busy to open this. Of total 1,165 live edits you have ZERO edit summaries...yes ZERO!
బాబు చిట్టి...నీకో దండం, ఎడిట్ సుమ్మరిలు వాడు....ప్లీజ్ !
(transl. Oh dear....I appeal to you, use edit summaries....PLEASE !) -- Ab207 (talk) 19:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raghuveer, to emphasise Ab207's point, you have been asked several times to use edit summaries. This isn't a trivial issue—edit summaries help other members of the community understand the rationale for the edits you are making. This is important when the rationale can't be easily determined, like when you silently remove content[1][2] or make changes that seem lateral. Unexplained removal of content, as one example, can be indistinguishable from vandalism, so in a world where other editors are watching the edits that each other makes, clarifying your reason for the edit can make the difference between someone thinking you're a vandal and someone understanding that the change was valid. Since this is a community editing project and other editors are asking you for better communication, that might be something to consider. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi, Raghuveer Aavula. You have continued to edit without edit summaries despite the appeals above. I think possibly you are not aware of this page, your own talkpage, which is for discussing with other editors. I have blocked you indefinitely, in the hope that it will help you find this page. As soon as you respond to me below, and undertake to use edit summaries in the future, you can be unblocked. Other admins, in case I'm not around, please make it so. Bishonen | tålk 19:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jagitial district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarangapur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blockage issue

Plse Bishonen unblock my wikipedia page i will follow the rules i will mention in my talk page from now onwards Raghuveer Aavula (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Raghuveer Aavula, nice to hear from you. Not sure what you mean by "i will mention in my talk page from now onwards". Will you use edit summaries from now on, and be responsive to warnings and advice on this page? I feel I have to ask, since in fact you don't use an edit summary for the post above. The automatically generated "new section" doesn't count, since it doesn't explain anything about your edit. A suitable — explanatory — edit summary for your edit above might have been for instance "Please unblock", or "Reply to Bishonen", or "Yes, I will use edit summaries". I hope I'm making myself clear. Please respond more specifically below: will you use edit summaries and be responsive to concerns on this page? Bishonen | tålk 08:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen, The editor must also ensure us that these kind of un-sourced and un-encyclopedic edits does not happen if unblocked. See [3] ~ Amkgp 💬 15:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we can ask them to guarantee that they'll altogether stop causing problems, Amkgp. My request that they undertake to be responsive to concerns on this page is meant to make them listen to, and discuss, all concerns that are brought here. Unsourced and unencyclopedic edits have been brought here, for instance with this post. I don't want a list here of all the kinds of problems that they need to avoid; communication will hopefully solve them. Especially, I don't want such a list since the user was apparently already so baffled by my request for a promise to use edit summaries that they have let three days go by without replying. Possibly there is a language problem that makes it difficult for them to understand/discuss stuff, and that may mean they have already given up. We'll just have to see if I ever get a response to my post above. And, indeed, if people can't communicate in English, my first advice to them is to instead edit the Wikipedia in their native language. Bishonen | tålk 16:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen, Truly said ~ Amkgp 💬 16:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]