User talk:Rabinhoodo

March 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Cox's Bazar District, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 04:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chittagong District, you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn talk 04:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: LTA, already reported, just rollback all as they edit. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 04:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, thank you. SunDawn talk 04:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Chittagong. SunDawn talk 04:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 07:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]