User talk:RabbleRouser
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article RubyDebug, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Matt Jones
[edit]Thanks for the thought, but it's a different guy. — Hex (❝?!❞) 22:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
chris messina
[edit]I know you mean well, but the last edit you made on the chris messina article is original research, and unless it has a source you're likely to enrage a wikitard. i'll leave it up to you to either find a source or revert it though, i thought i'd just give you a heads up 75.84.123.169 (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
txtmob & twitter
[edit]On the TXTMob page you wrote that TXTMob was one of the inspirations for twitter. Do you have any backing for that? It now stands removed. -- eiland (talk) 08:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, found it, too bad TXTMob is not working anymore, thanks for the inspiring projects at IAA. -- eiland (talk) 08:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I was working there and in the meetings where we did the brainstorming that created twitter. We were demoing TxtMob, and UPOC as examples of other text message systems which didn't get it right.
Nomination of Nathan Torkington for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Torkington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Torkington until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 19:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Nathan Torkington
[edit]
Hello, RabbleRouser. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Nathan Torkington".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 04:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Murat Niyazov for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murat Niyazov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.