User talk:Raaj494

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Raaj494! Thank you for your contributions. I am Mdann52 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Mdann52 (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shahrukh Khan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 19:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bodyguard (2011 Hindi film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Zeeyanketu ✉ 15:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,I have seen that you are providing ibnlive.in as a boxoffice source of Bodyguard (2011 Hindi film).Untill we appreciate your effort,we use only boxofficeindia as a reliable source on wikipedia.Cheers!--Zeeyanketu ✉ 17:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ek tha Tiger

At wikipedia we use only boxofficeindia as a reliable source.A user User talk:Ghajinidetails has been blocked because he has spreading misconception that other sources are used too.U can see his talk page for an example here *[1].--Zeeyanketu ✉ 08:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Forgot to put name. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Salman Khan, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Forgot to put name 17:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hum Aapke Hain Koun..! has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hum Aapke Hain Koun..! was changed by Raaj494 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953163 on 2015-08-28T12:46:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HAHK

Sir, please read this: Talk:Hum_Aapke_Hain_Koun..!#Order_of_credits. BollyJeff | talk 20:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It can be seen right here that that Dixit comes first. So stop being sexist. BollyJeff | talk 01:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. The names are listed in order of the official credits as determined by the film makers. We are not here to second guess their work. BollyJeff | talk 17:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!, you may be blocked from editing. BollyJeff | talk 18:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

These edits of yours at Baahubali: The Beginning are disruptive. If you disagree with using the budget from part 1, you need to open a discussion on the talk page. Otherwise, it is intuitive that we would use the budget for Part 1. You also changed the gross value from 650 crore to 600. This is inconsistent with the reference, and appears to be a deliberate falsification of information. If you disagree, feel free to reply here, or to open a discussion on the article's talk page. But any future edit like these will be treated as disruptive, which I'd like to avoid. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style, millions is preferred to crore. BollyJeff | talk 21:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kick (2014 film). Diff: You changed the budget figure, but it is inconsistent with the archived reference. However, at the time you changed the value, the unarchived reference was not resolving, which leads me to strongly believe you deliberately introduced false information. If this is an incorrect assessment, please reply below and explain why you changed the value without providing a new reference or an explanation. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Raaj494. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]