Jump to content

User talk:RSITYT2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My barnstars that people give to me

The Special Barnstar
Thanks for removing an removed userbox from the userboxes list so here you go! RSITYTMobile (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It Simple thingys


This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
RSITYT2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "AlfredoEditor". The reason given for AlfredoEditor's block is: "Disruptive editing, attack page creation and [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]]".


Accept reason: Auto-block lifted. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AlfredoEditor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlfredoEditor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 05:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RSITYT2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

 I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 11:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RSITYT2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I got lifted but you blocked me! RSITYT2 (talk) 11:51, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not edit a declined unblock request especially from a decline to accept. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @331dot:. See the page history. Tpa revoke may be needed. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]