User talk:RMJain1997

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hemchandra Jain per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hemchandra Jain. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RMJain1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm willing to contribute actively and I was not having any other pages to follow and learn edits so followed this person's edits. I'm involved in histories and geology. also active in Indian penal acts and case reference. please unblock RMJain1997 (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RMJain1997 (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RMJain1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no such proof that i'm using multiple account to manipulate pages. If you are not approving I shall need to make new account. Definitely you can not stop me from Editing Wikipedia. Please refer my previous request. Please unblock RMJain1997 (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is certainly proof; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hemchandra Jain/Archive, which I have verified; you've already made at least 16 new accounts, and you're really obvious, and we'll catch you every time you do it again. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.