User talk:RIP B1058/Archives/2024/August

Archives

ISS Edits

I have a couple of concerns with the listing of the “ISS Deorbit Vehicle” on the upcoming missions table on the ISS page: it’s premature (won’t launch until 2030-ish), it’s covered extensively elsewhere on the page, it’s incorrectly named (it’s the US Deorbit Vehicle), it’s presumptuous to say this will be launched by Falcon Heavy (no launch contract has been signed), and we don’t know that it will be attached Harmony forward.

As to Dream Chaser — you restored that as a Q4 ‘24 launch — I’ve seen no recent media coverage that would support that. They lost their Vulcan Centaur slot, now it’s up in the air when ULA can slot them in… if they’re even ready to launch. RickyCourtney (talk) 04:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renders show harmony forward @RickyCourtney ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 05:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NSF forum shows Q4 2024 once they update we will update it or lets follow https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/403. As soon as they get insider or official info they change which isnt shown till now ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 05:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't call a rendering a reliable source. Nor would I call a forum a reliable source. Point is, we can wait to list these until details are firmed up. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And next spaceflight??@RickyCourtney vro ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 05:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They’re reliable, but my point remains that the information is not. Next Spaceflight says NET 2024. That’s in line with the company’s statements that they hope to fly “by the end of 2024." My point is, that’s still not a very firm launch date, or month. I believe we should wait to list it on that page until we get something a little more firm. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok understood ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 06:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RickyCourtney i need your help on the claim of https://nara.getarchive.net/collections/building-iss-timeline whose text is used on iss page I think it's false as per wayback machine it was made in 2020 https://web.archive.org/web/20200813015228/https://nara.getarchive.net/collections/building-iss-timeline ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 07:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=International_Space_Station&url=https://nara.getarchive.net/collections/building-iss-timeline this is the claim. I am saying this since i have a personal experience with such claim. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was making a Cygnus ng-21 draft page and on asking approval i got https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RIP_B1058/Archives/2024/January#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Cygnus_NG-21_%28January_24%29 . I investigated and found that a wiki clone called handwriting has a en wiki clone page called https://handwiki.org/wiki/Engineering:Cygnus_NG-18 and i got a false copyright claim that was neglected once i protested. I am thinking the same for this iss page, the matter it talks of being copyright was written around early 2010s and thus i find this claim dubious and malicious. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 07:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What your thoughts on this @RickyCourtney vro? ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 07:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Angad Pratap

Hello, RIP B1058. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angad Pratap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ajit Krishnan

Hello, RIP B1058. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ajit Krishnan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angad Pratap (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, passing mentions do not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angad Pratap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajit Krishnan (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Passing mentions don't establish notability per WP:GNG. I expect there may well be more and better sources available? Also, please ensure that the draft is sufficiently supported, with every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal details clearly supported by inline citations to reliable published sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajit Krishnan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing, I knew its incomplete. But I am waiting for some stuff. Till them I am not investing time in these drafts and working on other astronaut biographies. See I just got 6 month delete notice at #Concern regarding Draft:Angad Pratap for draft deletion so I just sent it intentionally to be approved to get the page out of dormant state of 6 months when it will be deleted. ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 17:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All you have to do is make an edit to a draft to restart the 6-month clock. Schazjmd (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 02:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, but as @Schazjmd says, as long as there's a (human, ie. non-bot) edit every <6 months, the draft will be kept pretty much indefinitely. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ‍—🪦NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 02:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIP B1058! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Eric Philips (explorer)

added a link pointing to Australian

Rabea Rogge

added a link pointing to Aris

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]