User talk:Qwerty12302

Sorry

Hi Qwerty12302, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Qwerty12302. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Qwerty12302/Great Subscriber War

A tag has been placed on User:Qwerty12302/Great Subscriber War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hddty. (talk) 14:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First Grammatical Treatise

I don't directly know about it, but people on the article talk page have said that "Fyrsta málfræðiritgerðin" is Icelandic, not particularly Old Norse. The name "first grammatical treatise" did not arise until after the Old Norse period, in any case... AnonMoos (talk) 07:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems you're right. I'll undo my edit. --Qwerty12302 (talk | contributions) 09:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting revert on Kári Stefánsson page edits

Hi Qwerty, I was just seeing your changes last month to Kári Stefánsson's page, in which you have changed all mentions of him from 'Stefansson' to 'Kari,' and changed the little text on Icelandic use of patronymics at the top. I wanted to ask you to revert those changes, as he - and just about everyone here - is referred to by his given name in Icelandic, but not in English and outside of Iceland. As this is the English/international page, it now reads strangely and overly casual. I do understand the desire, which works locally and in Icelandic, but it's not standard usage in English.

I can revert it as well but I would rather convince you to do it!

Thanks and all best regards,

Lehmansson (talk) 12:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is in line with English Wikipedia policies to refer to Icelandic people with their given names, not patronymics, as you can see in the template I added in the beginning, as well as in MOS:PATRONYMIC or literally any other article of an Icelandic person. Qwerty12302 (talk | contributions) 12:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to improve the article, you can try to make it sound a bit more neutral and more in line with WP:NPOV; its current tone, to me at least, is quite praising of him, which it should not be. Qwerty12302 (talk | contributions) 12:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. I see that you are correct per that Wiki template, but contend that in the English-language context, outside of Iceland, this is simply incorrect in terms of usage and so ends of sounding overfamiliar and weird. The main reason being that he is well known in his field, and is referred to almost always as Stefansson or in interviews as Dr Stefansson. I can assure you that nearly everyone reading this will have come from seeing his name mentioned in an article or scientific paper where he will have been referred to by his patronmyic, so will think calling him by his give name is odd. Maybe cute and Icelandic, but odd.

On the tone, I am interested in his work and impact on the field, which have been substantial and widely judged so, as the sources show. Praise isn't the point, and I don't think he needs any more of that!

Have a think on my argument here. For me, usage wins over rules every time, however good the rules are as general guides. In this case the rule is rock solid IN Iceland, but very questionable out in the big world, which is what the English Wikipedia is all about. There aren't many Icelanders of moden times who are very well known abroad, even in particular fields, but they do seem to be known by their patronymics unless they have an unusual given one they use as a brand - a la Bjork. Halldór Laxness is never called just Halldór. The artist Olafur Elíasson is never Olafur, except in his Wikipedia entry, which again reads strangely for that reason. The same goes for Eiður Smári, who, whether he liked it or not, was referred to in the British and football press around the world as Gudjohnsen, even though the Brazilian and Portuguese precedents should have let him be called by his given names.

This is an interesting question, so I´m looking forward to hearing your further thoughts.

Cheers,

Lehmansson (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of this changes the fact that Wikipedia policy is to use the given name instead of the patronymic or last name, even when that is not usually the case in other English-speaking media. If you don't like it, you can take it up at the relevat MOS talk page. I'd say the sentence

Icelandic people with patronymics (which is most of them) may be referred to by their given name or their given name and patronymic, but not by their patronymic alone.

sums it up quite well, without any leeway given to how the person might be commonly referred to in other English-speaking contexts.

For me, usage wins over rules every time, however good the rules are as general guides.

For you, maybe, but in Wikipedia, there is a set of guidelines decided by the community, and I see no point in starting a rebellion to deviate from those. As I said, you can always suggest a change and if you get a consensus behind you, the guidelines will be changed. If you are advocating for using patronymics for Icelandic people all over the English Wikipedia, this is the wrong place to have that discussion. Qwerty12302 (talk | contributions) 19:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phonemic vs. diaphonemic

Thank you for your reversion at Yorkshire, but the explanation you gave there and at User talk:2A01:4B00:87FF:9B00:B1CB:14F3:69AF:AD5A isn't quite right. Help:IPA/English and {{IPAc-en}} use a diaphonemic, not phonemic, notation. Accents can have different sets of phonemes, and a phonemic transcription of a non-rhotic accent's pronunciation of word-final or preconsonantal /ər/ would still be /ə/, just as /kɑːt/ could be a phonemic transcription of cot, caught or cart depending on accent. We have a handy explanation/shortcut at WP:DIAPHONEMIC. Just thought it might help you to keep this in mind. Nardog (talk) 12:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danny Kinahan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William McCrea. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oblisco tower

Dear team First i would like to thank u for ur great effort for the new administrative capital in egypt Just need to advice regarding the oblisco tower plan is delayed for unknown , as i contacted with the main admin for the project and confirmed me so , also i dont know about the other upcoming projects if they are confirmed or not I just advice in case u need to recheck and adjust the information here Thank u again so much Shindy2021 (talk) 01:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Associated Public Schools of Victoria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scotch College and Wesley College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal School Dungannon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Dawson and John Creighton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for explaining your recent alteration of the Cosmo Lang article. For your future guidance, it is a courtesy and helpful to other editors to include an edit summary when making changes. See WP:FIES. Good wishes, Tim riley talk 21:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to note that you are persisting in making alterations without bothering to add an edit summary. Please desist: this selfish and lazy practice makes life harder for editors keeping an eye on articles via their watchlist. Tim riley talk 23:44, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your last change to N. Asokan

Hi, you made some changes to the article on N. Asokan without an edit summary. One of the changes was to replace the initial ("N. ") with a full first name. The edit by Joe Petrik from a year ago which undid a similar change did have an edit summary explaining why "N. " should be used instead of the first name. May I ask you to revert this particular change? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.203.59 (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See MOS:FULLNAME. --Qwerty12302 (talk | contributions) 13:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]