User talk:Quinsareth

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username.

I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ]

02:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Your commas

You have been inserting unnecessary commas into several articles. Is this a crusade? Moriori 03:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just thought I was correcting grammar. My English textbook says that is the correct way. — Galaeron Nihmedu 02:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It says to insert commas when using the month/day/year format. The example it gives is the following: "Hawaii achieved statehood on August 21, 1959, and became the fiftieth state. [Notice that a comma separates the final item in a date (1959) from the words that follow it.]"

The second example is this: "Write to me at 423 Twentieth Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84101-0423, after the first of May. [Notice that a comma separates the final item in an address (84101-0423) from the words that follow it.]"

The textbook is the Holt Handbook (ISBN 0-03-065287-1), published in 2003, and written by John E. Warriner. This particular issue about grammar is trivial, however, so I don't want to make a big deal about it. — Galaeron Nihmedu 03:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This particular issue is about Wikipedia style, not someone else's. Wikipedia does not use a comma after the year (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)) and in some cases does not use a comma between day/month and year. Moriori 22:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belephron (Belaphron)

Hi there, I noticed that in Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark, when you encounter Grimgnaw in Cania, one of his followers is a lich named Belaphron. I remember fighting a lich named Belephron, I believe, in either the original NWN campaign or Shadows of Undrentide and this lich is probably meant to be the same one, though the name was altered a little, but I can't remember exactly where I fought him. If you know what I'm talking about, could you please fill me in so that I can write an entry about Belephron? Thanks.--Rouge Rosado Oui? 21:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have not played that game. — Galaeron Nihmedu 02:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dartz

Because it is redundant with the presence of "Manga and Anime villains", which is a subcategory of "Television villains". You do not put a subcategory with a parent category in articles. 02:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletes

Hello! Just wanted to let you know that when you nominate an article for speedy-deletion, you must give a reason. See the criteria for speedy deletion for more details. -- P.B. Pilh e t / Talk 02:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just thought it was obvious if a new article's only content is "This cd is awesome! I love the song GROWN UP CHRISTMAS LIST!!!!!!!" — Galaeron Nihmedu 02:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSD

Why shouldn't it be a speedy? It doesn't meet WP:N. Please advise- Tlim7882 10:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is not about a person, group, company, or web content, and there are plenty of other articles on Wikipedia about schools. {{subst:afd}} allows people to discuss whether the article should be deleted or not. — Galaeron Nihmedu 10:53, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of topics on Wikipedia is a reflection of whether those topics have been included in reliable published works. Other authors, scholars, or journalists have decided whether to give attention to a topic, and in their expertise have researched and checked the information about it. Thus, the primary notability criterion is a way to determine whether "the world" has judged a topic to be notable. This is unrelated to whether a Wikipedia editor personally finds the subject remarkable or worthy.

Tlim7882 11:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what AFD is for. — Galaeron Nihmedu 11:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RC Patrolling

Darn, you keep reverting before I have a chance to. What Internet service do you use? — Quin 06:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NTL:Telewest (recently acquired by Virgin Media); it's broadband, but it's not particularly fast, I get error pages and slow loading times now and then like everyone else. The trick is to go after the subtle vandalism; I'm using software a bit like VandalProof, and it picks out the obvious stuff so I can revert it quickly. Subtle stuff I don't get to so fast – Qxz 06:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A reward; a medal

Thanks for watching over me. I will do the same for you if I see something like that. Cheers. --Rednblu 03:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chembox new

Hi, I see you are adding items to the {{chembox new}}. I am sorry, but most of these should be added to the sub-templates, and not to the main-section (to keep the formatting and layout consistent). The items that are still available in the main-template are there only for historic reasons, and will be removed after I have done a cleanup of the pages that use chembox new. I will move them later into the sub-templates. Hope this explains. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 07:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the notice. — Quin 20:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And good to meet you again.

Thanks, my buddy. No matter which primary concern in all the work you take for your own, thanks for protecting my UserPage while I slept. :)) --Rednblu 09:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. — Quin 03:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy

Allo.
I wouldn't normally bother leaving a message for someone just because I reverted them, but in this case, your edit (here) was both logical and in good-faith, so I figured I owed you an explanation. "Effect", though usually misused when used as a verb, can still sometimes be accurately used as a verb; specifically, when it's used to express causation or instigation. In this case, if you "bring about change", or, "cause change", then you are "effecting change". Anyways, just thought I'd mention it. Have a nifty day. Bladestorm 14:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Kingdom" of Amhara

Please see Talk:Kingdom of Amhara, there are problems with your recent additions. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 01:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:DerHexer and my user page...

Thanks for the reverts... Cheers. --Dark Falls ^talk 08:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for protecting my page from the vandals.Dust Filter 23:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. It seems like you're doing the same for others, so keep up the good work! --דניאל - Danielrocks123 19:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Coker

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Looks like I'm not the only one to be thanking you recently. I think these are all related back to that Coker guy. Anyway, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. GlassCobra 20:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D&D creatures

Thanks for adding some sources to the D&D creatures articles. I don't know how much they will help with the AFD, as the nominating editor is pretty determined to get rid of them and is not taking any counter arguments seriously. Either way, your efforts are appreciated. Keep up the good work! BOZ 06:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert

Thank you for the revert on the Food chemistry article. I greatly apprecaite it. Chris 14:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GTA IV

Nice reverting work on the GTA IV article. Thanks. - X201 07:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalblock

Hi there. I had two tabs open, one for Recent IP changes and one for the IP address in question. I was refreshing those two tabs at once because it was quicker just to have those two open at any one time. Dreadstar has done the job now, so everything is as it should be. Bobo . 16:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Sorcerer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Sorcerer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfD

Hi, I want to notify you of three of your redirects which have been proposed for deletion - see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 November 16#Arrow redirects. -- -- Prince Kassad (talk) 20:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For being such a good new page patroller, I award you a barnstar!--Phoenix-wiki ^{talk · contribs} 13:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you. ➳ Quin 13:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Propose to delete 土

土

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 土, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of 土. Woodstone (talk) 18:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:EINECSCASNO

A tag has been placed on Template:EINECSCASNO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you so much for reverting that deletion! I have at times been heart-sick about the censorship of that article. —SlamDiego_←T 13:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, although I'm not sure what you are referring to.➳ Quin 13:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! NawlinWiki (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. ➳ Quin 13:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of ˌwiˑkiˈpidi.ə

RfD

Hi, I nominated 39 of your redirects for deletion, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 April 29#Space redirects. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of ⠡

RfD nomination of ∗

RfD nomination of ◇

AfD nomination of Sharn (Forgotten Realms)

I have nominated Sharn (Forgotten Realms), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharn (Forgotten Realms). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: 寸 may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/寸 .

The faster you respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 19:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question for you

Hello, Quinsareth. I have a question regarding your signature, but since it involves one of our private Abuse filters, I'd like to ask you privately if at all possible. Could you send me an email at hersfoldwikigmail.com when you get a chance? If you don't have access to email, that's fine, just let me know. You're not in trouble or anything, don't worry. Happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

廾 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 廾. Since you had some involvement with the 廾 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 20:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of ⇧

屮 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 屮. Since you had some involvement with the 屮 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Lenticel ^(talk) 02:23, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Five reserved code points listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirects 𐍋, 𐍌, 𐍍, 𐍎, and 𐍏. Since you created them, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion. Gorobay (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

␣ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ␣. Since you had some involvement with the ␣ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ï¿½ (talk) 18:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nilshai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nilshai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilshai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Quinsareth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"❶" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ❶. Since you had some involvement with the ❶ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"三" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 三. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#三 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aasim (talk) 21:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"O͞o" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect O͞o. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 29#O͞o until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"⇢" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect ⇢ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § ⇢ until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]