User talk:Liliana-60

{{TB}} Welcome!

Hello, Liliana-60, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Edchilvers 18:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for List of Unicode characters

I've responded to your AfD. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)}^|^HISTORY 18:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kokuzna vremena

OK.--Anthony.bradbury 21:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Karkemish 1.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Karkemish_1.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Prince Kassad 07:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thanks for telling me. Please leave me about 1 month (I remove the tag) to ask to the copyright holder if he is OK to put the picture under the GFDL/CC licences. Thanks in advance. Poppypetty 07:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Wikipedia_Malay.JPG

You have recently listed this image which I uploaded for deletion. I have to say that there is no basis to your claim. The Harry Potter cover shown is not the main subject of the screen shot. This image is a screen shot of the Malay Wikipedia. It clearly implies that that is that. Should there be claims that the Harry Potter cover is not a free image, the Harry Potter cover image uploaded at the Malay Wikipedia should be deleted instead of this screen shot.Horacenew (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reason applies to personality rights, but we're talking about copyright here, where it doesn't matter whether the copyrighted part is the main subject or not - if one part is copyrighted, the whole image is.

Also, of course the Harry Potter cover is copyrighted - copyright is granted to every object without registration or notice, and Rowling has not released the cover under a free license as far as I know. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 16:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless redirs

I was just wondering, how do you search for/find those useless redirects containing control characters and the like? [Good job on that, by the way!] I was wondering if I could help find them. Thanks! RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 13:05, May 11, 2008 (UTC)

I go to Special:Allpages and list all pages starting from the Armenian letter Ա (logged out and with IE which conveniently shows all special characters in the adress bar). That's where the hunting ground begins, I use my eye and look for suspicious redirects, dotted circles (indicating a misspelling in Indic names) and the like. You can't believe just how many useless redirects are hidden there. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something that might just make your day! A proposal to speedy these kinds of things without days of pointless prebaricating. Your input would be appreciated. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 14:33, May 11, 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png}

Thank you for uploading Image:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

독도

Re this edit: the article was not a substantial copy of the kowiki article; in fact, according to Google translate, it was an anti-Japanese rant about Dokdo. This mistake is pretty easy to make, but next time, if it isn't a copy of a foreign-language WP article, and it isn't a blatant copyvio, please bring it to WP:PNT and/or tag with {{notenglish}}. Thanks for your contributions, nneonneo ^talk 20:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the requirement that the articles have to be identical? Most pages say the article only has to exist at the foreign language wiki to be eligible for speedy. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"a foreign-language article that exists on another Wikimedia project". The interpretation I take is that the article has to be a copy (in full or in part) of the other article. The user notification template {{foreign-warn}} makes this more clear: "the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project". nneonneo ^talk 22:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

screenshot

Hello Kassad, How do you create screenshots for the whole screen? like this image: Image:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png.--Alnokta (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I go to full screen mode in my browser, take a screenshot of every part of the page and then stitch them together. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 20:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:BAB-Plan-Parkplatz

A tag has been placed on Template:BAB-Plan-Parkplatz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Composite phoneme

You may be right on this, but the connection g+b (the ones that make up a single phoneme in Ewe) shows wrongly, at least on my screen does, because what you did shows as if the phoneme were made up with ὲ+g (in Ewe there is no such a composite phoneme as ὲg) instead of g+b. Regards. --80.5.88.40 (talk) 10:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in the summary, it's a known bug in the Arial Unicode MS font. It cannot position the arc correctly and shows exactly as you described. In other fonts it works fine. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 10:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. I did not noticed the last bit of the summary. The problem mentioned before takes place with IE but about a couple of hours ago I had the chance to look at it with Firefox and the problem was exactly the opposite; the arc went over b+è. It logically must be a lack of consistency about the design of each font but I find quite strange that at least two important fonts design that particular symbol so arbitrariously. It is not difficult at all designing a font character like this so that it should be placed between the couple of letters involved in order and show reasonable good results, so I wonder whether this happens out of sheer lack of co-ordination, lack of interest or simple personal taste by the designers. I guess the only way to solve this would be by Wikimedia automatically forcing the display of their own fonts or, maybe, of previously hand-fixed font versions installed in the monobook. This last option, might start copyright issues, though. Thanks anyway. --80.5.88.40 (talk) 17:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is easy to make the arc position correctly (I have some experience with developing fonts so I know). For the first case (over ὲg) it might have been a misunderstanding by the developer of the Arial Unicode MS font. It's not quite obvious how one should position the double arc, and even though officially it should go between the characters, the developer thought it must be positioned after both characters. Now, the other case (positioned over bè) is surprising, and is something I'd expect of monospaced fonts (where combining diacritics do not work due to design limitations).

Embedding fonts is a possibility and there was a discussion about it, I don't know how it turned out though. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 18:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wasser!

Hallo! Ja, Thogo hat mich da neulich auch drauf hingewiesen und ich dachte dann erstmal: "Mist!" ;)
Ich hatte vor längerer Zeit auch schon einmal 'ne Menge Übersetzungen aus dem Wiktionary übernommen, teilweise aber ersetzt und korrigiert, habe mir leider auch nie bei den Sprachen die Quelle drangeschrieben, so dass ich nicht mehr weiß, was von dir bzw. der Wiktionaryseite und was aus Wörterbüchern oder Grammatiken ist. Meine Sammlung beträgt zurzeit 2379 Sprachen, ich sammle sie "daheim" in einer Excel-Datei, wo ich mehrere Spalten habe für:

den Namen der Sprache (ich halte mich da an Ethnologue, sofern's die Sprache dort gibt)
das Wort für Wasser in Originalschrift
das Wort in einer üblichen Transliteration/Transkription
das Wort in IPA, falls ich das rausfinden konnte
die Verwandtschaftsbeziehung von Ethnologue, so dass man's auch danach sortieren kann

Ich hab noch nicht geplant, die Tabelle online zu stellen, würde das aber sicher irgendwann mal machen wollen. Zusammenarbeiten finde ich keine schlechte Idee, auch wenn ich meine Sammlung ungern "weggebe". Zurzeit habe ich leider Schwierigkeiten mit meinem Computer (vorgestern habe ich gebangt, meine Datei könnte für immer weg sein!), deswegen würd ich das mal lieber noch ein wenig rausschieben, bis bei mir zuhause rechnermäßig alles wieder in Ordnung ist. — N-true (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ADU

cant work out where you are going with this one. You want it expanded or what? I am a software engineer do a number of languages but German is not my best but at the mo this is just a stub. SimonTrew (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be referring to Application layer framing, in which case the problem is I don't quite understand the article. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Fear of Change Barnstar

		The Fear of Change Barnstar
		Ha! I love it. For your clever rescuing of the original (and, imo, far superior) logo, I present to you the Fear of Change Barnstar. Why do they bother fixing things that ain't broke? –xeno^talk 13:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Internet Explorer 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MIPS

Internet Explorer 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MIPS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kannada Wikipedia

The article Kannada Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable website, per WP:NOTABLE, composed of first-hand sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CzechWikipedia 20071129.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CzechWikipedia 20071129.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windows NT 3.1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mainframe and Localization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mae meh listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mae meh. Since you had some involvement with the Mae meh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TheChampionMan1234 00:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFD

In your vote you posted to Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_October_20#Mae_meh you said "Wiktionary". Did you mean to say "Wikipedia"? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 08:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes I did. I guess working so long at Wiktionary has started to affect me. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bundesstraße 9 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bingen, Kranenburg and Worms

Bundesstraße 258 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blankenheim

Bundesstraße 500 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Waldshut

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bundesstraße 99, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neiße (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kannada Wikipedia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kannada Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kannada Wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. eh bien mon prince (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Baden-Württemberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitutional convention. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Soyuz 7K-OK No.1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Soyuz 7K-OK No.1. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Soyuz 1. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Soyuz 1 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Psychotic Spartan 123 20:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mae meh listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mae meh. Since you had some involvement with the Mae meh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BAB-Plan-Tunnel-

Template:BAB-Plan-Tunnel- has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ф29 phage listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ф29 phage. Since you had some involvement with the Ф29 phage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:57, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]