User talk:Queeninbriefs

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Queeninbriefs! I am Mysdaao and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Mysdaao ^talk 14:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions

I noticed you've requested speedy deletion of some pages, such as Dj Danny. Your help is appreciated, and I have a few suggestions for you. First, there are specific criteria for speedy deletion and appropriate tag(s) to use for each one. You can find them at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. For example, speedy deletion for being a non-notable person is criteria A7, and you can use {{db-person}} for it. Second, it is always a good idea to notify the creator of the article you want deleted on the user's talk page. Once you've placed the speedy deletion tag, there are instructions on what template to use on the author's talk page for notification. Please let me know if there are any questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao ^talk 15:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ruzwana Bashir, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cyclopia ^talk 13:39, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Dainton Connell

Hello! Your submission of Dainton Connell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AshLin (talk) 07:11, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dainton Connell

On 26 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dainton Connell, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the bodyguard to the Pet Shop Boys was a leader of Arsenal FC's hooligan firm during the 1980s? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqui Hames has been accepted

Jacqui Hames, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Queeninbriefs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not abusing anything. I just forgot my password so created a new account. I have not been doing any edits which conflict or any sort of sockpuppetry

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. There's not enough information here to review your block. Which other accounts have you used? Yamla (talk) 12:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Queeninbriefs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I've used two others - Rukilo2 and Soof2311. Mainly because I forgot usernames or passwords and just it seemed easier to create a new account rather than try to remember. I'm not a frequent editor - only just returned to WP after 7 years away, but as you can see from my edits there aren't any conflicts or sockpuppetry. Wasn't aware how tight WP had gotten on multiple accounts - which is good but I have fallen foul.

Decline reason:

Block has expired. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

Well, that's what we are supposed to do, innit? Please elaborate. You say you did what seven years ago? You forgot which user login when?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have not edited on a regular basis WP for around 7 years, so wasn't aware how frowned upon the practice of "if I can't remember my login details, I'll just create a new account" had become, until this happened. Queeninbriefs (talk) 10:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer the question posed by Dlohcierekim. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which part haven't I already answered? Queeninbriefs (talk) 14:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At a minimum, You forgot which user login when?. I'd be interested in You say you did what seven years ago? too tho. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. When I began editing again in the last eight weeks. 2. Seven years ago I stopped editing Wikipedia on a regular basis. Queeninbriefs (talk) 11:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Public holidays in the United Kingdom

The accepted process for disputed changes is BOLD, revert, discuss so that an agreeable way forward can be achieved with consensus. Just reverting reverts leads to edit warring and unnecessary drama. I'm reverting the change so that discussion can take place, if you choose to initiate such a discussion on the article's talk page. Cabayi (talk) 11:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello Queeninbriefs. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to J. Albert "Tripp" Smith, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Queeninbriefs. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Queeninbriefs|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 09:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not paid to edit. That page was created because he bought part of West Ham United Queeninbriefs (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to J. Albert "Tripp" Smith, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Queeninbriefs, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Queeninbriefs|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 16:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J. Albert "Tripp" Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Albert "Tripp" Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Albert "Tripp" Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 17:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]