User talk:Queen Kitty Cat

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Queen Kitty Cat! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 06:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Kitty Cat, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Queen Kitty Cat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Queen Kitty Cat! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Citing unpublished source material, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gilbert Academy 2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gilbert Academy 2. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 11:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilbert Academy 2 has been accepted

Gilbert Academy 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 06:09, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While there are a few issues to solve in the new article I believe it warrants acceptance with those issues yet to be solved. It matters little who solves those outstanding issues. I suggest that you be 'father' to the new article,letting it graze its knees, rather than its 'mother', wrapping in soft warm towels, and move on to new work Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 06:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You and@FloridaArmy will see that I have done some trivial work in Gilbert Academy and also created the Wikidata item for it. I'm very much feeling my way around Wikidata, but Wikidata is something you should each at least know about, despite its being100% non intuitive to work in.

One important thing I've added to the article is the infobox, which I've fleshed out as best I can. You'll both see comments om the new article about its shortfalls. Now, neither of you needs to handle these, and we can hope that someone else will do so. But each of you is better placed to address some than many other editors since you have worked to create this article

Thank you for working together in order to create a better accepted article Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 07:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure you and @FloridaArmy can get a Wikipedia:Did you know out of this article. Why not give it a try? Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 11:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]