User talk:QueenCake/Archive 1
Welcome
[edit]
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 792 Naval Air Squadron, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.tiger-lair.org/units/unitsDetail.asp?unitID=100. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Jackmjx
[edit]This user has committed vandalism on more than one page, I "undid" the one on the MC Hammer article. I saw your remark on his page too. If you reply, I'll check back here. Thanks... 2legit2quit2 (talk) 19:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well the user seems to have acknowledged our warnings and has stopped the vandalism, one less to worry over QueenCake (talk) 20:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
sea-borne
[edit]There is a difference between British and American English over the use of compound words. Many compound words that are used in American English are either separate words in British English or hyphenated in British English sea-borne is one such word which in the Article First English Civil War should not have the hyphen removed as you did with this edit. See Oxford English Dictionary 2nd edition "sea-borne". (and from the list given in the online version: sea-adder; sea air; sea-angler; sea-animal; sea-ape; sea-apple; sea-bank; sea-bar; sea-bass; sea-bat; sea-bath; sea-bathe, v.; sea-bathing; sea beach; sea-bean; sea-bear; sea-beast; sea-beat, a.; sea-beaten, a.; sea-beaver; sea-beef; Seabees, n. pl.; sea-bell; sea-bird; sea-bladder; sea-blubber; seaboard, n. and a.; sea-boat; sea-book; sea-border; sea-borderer; sea-bordering, a.; sea-born, a.; sea-borne, a.; sea-bottom; sea-bound, a.1; sea-bound, a.2; sea-bream; sea-breeze; Seabright; sea-bull; sea-cabbage ...) --PBS (talk) 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Congrats
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For becoming such a great asset to Wikipedia in such a short amount of time. Keep up the good work! Eustress (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
The Hungary–Sweden relations aricle has been improved. There is content about countries relations with each other. --Tamás Kádár (talk) 11:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Can you upload a picture about the Hungary–Sweden relations? Thanks! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 12:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. QueenCake (talk) 14:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
RE: Vandalism message
[edit]Hello. You left a message saying you identified one of my edits as vandalism. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.29.234.88&oldid=264898069
I don't think that was vandalism and I don't think it should be removed. If you disagree, please explain what policy I violated and how. For my part, it was a good faith edit which alerted users that the monster image did in fact have the required notice, and that the bot message could be ignored- which now is not evident since you seem to have removed my message and not addressed the issue. Thanks for your consideration.--24.29.234.88 (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Oregon Vortex
[edit]Hello Queen Cake! Your comments to me about the "veracity" and the "worthiness" of my edit to the article on the Oregon Vortex were nothing short of rude. Have you been there? Do you believe an eye witness is less reliable than someone with a Ph.D., or less who has NEVER been there? Someone who has never been in the energy and has had the oppotunity to experience all the things that the article derides? That "optical illusion" that occurs with two people does not happen in a controlled environment. It takes place in the great outdoors. And I have also seen the golf balls, and many, many other things. I now see that Wikipedia is nothing more than a forum for frustrated editors and writers who have never sold anything worthwhile and this is their last claim to fame, and they're going to go for it for all it's worth, regardless of whether they distort the truth or not. Getting your name out there is what's MOST important. What arrogance!!! You don't even live in the US, let alone Oregon! I have been to the vortex many, many times, and I will swear on a warehouse of Bibles that all the phenomena is just that: PHENOMENA. And by the way, my "name" on this joke of a enclyclopedia is Ms Medium. That's because I AM a Spiritualist Medium and am sensistive to energies, both good and bad, and I can tell you, yours needs a vigorous cleaning. MsMedium (talk)MsMedium —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC).
Your rollback request
[edit]Hello QueenCake, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 17:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 19:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
Re: Barnstar
[edit]Thank you so much for the Barnstar. I really appreciate it. It's nice to know my contributions are appreciated. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Re: Barnstar
[edit]Same here, kind sir (or madam, don't want to offend!!). This is my first earned barnstar that I didn't have to go find to earn!! Thanks! -Pparazorback (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Medieval Total War
[edit]Well if we can't have the list in the main article, I propose that we make a new article dedicated to the list of factions and information about them. Its just that I have noticed that Viking and Rome have lists of factions and I thought this one should too. I think it would also help people who are planning to buy the game to try and help them to tell which factions may be good for them to try when they're starting out
Please let me know what you think
Yours Sincerly The C of E (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Well then maybe we could remake it and make it a better article, one that won't get deleted so easily The C of E (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for reverting vandalism on my User Page! EdBever (talk) 21:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages
[edit]Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! SBHarris 00:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
re: Great Job
[edit]Well thank you, and exactly the same message back to you ^_^ - Kingpin13 (talk) 09:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of File:Invasion screen002.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Invasion screen002.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
{{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Invasion screen002.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. QueenCake (talk) 22:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Hee Hee, my own message :-) QueenCake (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Re:
[edit]Can you please explain / justify HOW my edits were 'vandalism'? As I understand, 15-year-olds adding vulgarities that are completely out of place to an article is vandalism. Adding information which you do not agree with is not 'vandalism'. Ganging up on a newer user is also not very friendly. Please allow the article to evolve rationally, rather than simply deleting everything new. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.50.66.62 (talk) 22:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- You added in factual/and or other errors in the article, i.e. the opening sentence did not match the article title. See this. Versus22 talk 22:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Exactly, plus it read a little POV QueenCake (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]A hearty thanks goes out to you for reverting the vandalism of the talk: Northern Arizona University page, your diligence and initiative is profoundly appreciated! Kitaro001 (talk) 02:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Pakistan international airlines
[edit]I removed information that is outdated and of no value since PIA cancelled the A320 deal with ALAFCO in August 2008, the 747-300 lease period was for Feb-April 2008, plans to lease A300/A310 and 737 in first quarter 2009 has been dropped.116.71.34.105 (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Mr. Negative
[edit]I don't understand, how a information can be inconstrictive - I'm just wrote what we know about this comics, nothing more. What's wrong with it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.11.142.247 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Dispute
[edit]Have filed a dispute with WikiPedia regarding your conduct. Clearly you can't stand genuine contributors.85.210.73.77 (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- No I can't stand vandals, also please leave messages properly, by making a header, writing your text underneath and signing. QueenCake (talk) 20:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Re:Medieval: Total War
[edit]No problem, just glad to have another Total War article up there. I shouldn't worry about the image, the bot will come and automatically clean it away in a few days. -- Sabre (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Medieval Total War Land Warfare.png)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Medieval Total War Land Warfare.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- Image is redundant, delete at your leisure :) QueenCake (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Korea Japan disputes
[edit]The reason why I put in that Korea believes this would be like going to court for ownership of Tokyo is because the article seemed bias. It article seemed to imply that Korea just didn't want to go to court because they were afraid of something, but if you read the Korean history books/news papers they actually don't understand why Japan wants to go to court for Dokdo. They see Dokdo as belonging to Korea like Seoul. They are not afraid to go to court like the article implies, but can not understand the silly reason for it.--4.23.83.100 (talk) 04:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Medieval Total WAR
[edit]The british isles is a term not used by the Irish. It is a term created and used by the british. It should not be used on medieval total war page. Also the Irish are not a british faction. That is historically incorrect and offensive. Unless u can understand what I am saying than we are going to have a long argument —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dublin1994 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Message
[edit]QueenCake, I removed the Commander in Chief of Australia because it is wrong: check section 68 of the Australian Constitution. I have provided an explanation in the discussion section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.38.85 (talk) 22:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Was your edit to British Armed Forces automated in some way? It did a lot of useless edits which are visible in the diff: why was there a gap added in all of the parameters in the infobox and the table? More importantly why did it break the links? Regards, Woody (talk) 20:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
- Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Hello QueenCake. Just wanted to let you know that I declined the speedy-delete you suggested for this article, as the subject appears to have some coverage in third-party sources. Regards, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 22:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Network Analysis Module - "non-notable product"
[edit]The Cisco network analysis module is a key performance management offering of Cisco. If you are a networking person, you will understand that product in this category are critical pieces in enabling network performance. This is analogous to treating the speedometer of your car as an optional item. Ash1932 (talk) 21:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I think you are missing the point that I am trying to highlight. I first submitted this article and I got pushback that this was blatant advertising. I have changed this to make it more factual - just like other products. When did Wikipedia become a place to filter out information... I can understand the need to prevent advertising type information. There are other Cisco products listed out here - what is the specific problem with this particular one. Ash1932 (talk) 01:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
I decided to search on products in this category... just so that you understand the scope of this product - there are 6000 customers globally, the product does a direct business of close to $60m/year. If you are planning to delete this, then a number of other products should be removed from Wikipedia. If you disagree with the content - sure, let's discuss. Ash1932 (talk) 01:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Timothy Ryan (newspaper publisher)
[edit]An editor has nominated Timothy Ryan (newspaper publisher), an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Ryan (newspaper publisher) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. - Eastmain (talk) 02:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Dear QueenCake,
You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.
The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:
- Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 22:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Corrections
[edit]Thank you for putting my edit in the correct place. Actually, you will see that it is not quite correct. Also, I can see that I have made some errors that I would like to correct. Can you explain to me how I can make the corrections. Thanks,
Frank Boyles