User talk:Qewel
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Summer_20) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/TEST_-_Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Summer) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Spring) . |
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Fall_2017). Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. |
Speedy deletion nomination of Privacy on Dating Apps
[edit]Hello Qewel,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Privacy on Dating Apps for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Meatsgains (talk) 23:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Quewel, I was notified of this deletion. Unfortunately I have to agree with the decision here - the only content you had in the article was "in development", which would be seen as non-substantial content. I understand that you're working on this topic, however it would be far better to work on a copy of this in your userspace as opposed to live. One of the main reasons for this is that working in your userspace will give you more time to work on your topic, whereas live content is expected to be immediately able to pass notability guidelines and have substantial content. One of the good things about your userspace, other than it gives you more time, is that you can create work spaces fairly easy - all you have to do is enter something like User:Qewel/Privacy on dating apps. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Qewel, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Privacy concerns with online dating services
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Privacy concerns with online dating services. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Privacy concerns with social networking services. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Privacy concerns with social networking services. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi - I received another notification about this. Offhand I can see their concern. I had thought that perhaps this may warrant its own article, but it looks like it's too overall similar of a topic to have its own article. My recommendation would be to see if any of the content could be summarized and merged into Privacy concerns with social networking services, most likely into the section about social networks. You could do a general overview of dating websites and their risks, then include the section about the data hacks. You could ask RHaworth if he would be willing to send a copy of the deleted content into your userspace, if this is something you would be interested in, and of course I can help you with summarizing the data. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Introduction from Jaysdayy
[edit]Hello Qewel, I am part of the Coleman lab and my username is Jaysdayy. I hope I was able to complete this message effectively. I am excited to learn more! See you soon!
Jaysdayy (talk) 02:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Jaysdayy! Great job on introducing yourself on a talk page! I'm excited for lab to get rolling too, haha. Qewel (talk) 03:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]Unspecified source/license for File:16782 theresamillerf.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:16782 theresamillerf.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 09:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
