User talk:QEDquid

Welcome!

Hello, QEDquid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather 08:55, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great work!

Great work so far! Encyclopedist (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

db-contact

Please learn what {{db-contact}} means. I have removed your tags from Sdc.com and Robert Cibis because neither article was an attempt to communicate. -- RHaworth 19:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Again William Everly is nn-bio not attempt to communicate. -- RHaworth 19:38, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example of an article which would qualify for {{db-contact}}. (Although in this case the correct treatment was "revert" because there already was a valid article on this title.) -- RHaworth 21:50, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1-bit DAC

Sorry. It was (and still is now that you've reverted) an orphan article, any person (technical or otherwise) is unlikely to find it. If you create an appropriate link from the main article, it will be safe from my "wrath". --W.marsh 14:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then you did a good deed. But those links are removed once someone completes them, it seems. So there was nothing linking to 1-bit DAC (other than this talk page, now). I guess it's a pet peeve of mine, I was wrong to redirect like that. But something from Digital-to-analog converter should link to it, otherwise it will appear on the list of orphan pages. Sorry about all of this, really I understand your confusion, like I said, it's just a peeve of mine and I didn't handle it properly. --W.marsh 19:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've just created a Bitstream (disambiguation) page which includes Bitstream (DAC), currently a redirect to 1-bit DAC. Would you mind if 1-bit DAC was the redirect instead? SDS 01:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing monobook.js for afd helper

Hi. You tried to install the afd helper, but it seems you copied the script at a time when some things had accidentally been capitalised, breaking the script. Please replace AFD_helper with afd_helper in your monobook.js. Thanks and enjoy! jnothman ^talk 22:25, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint

I am disappointed in the overert aggression against postings I have made to which I DO have copyright permissions to post. It is bothersome that legitimate articles are being deleted by "Editors." This is regarding the biography of Anni Adams entitled "The Meeting of Anni Adams: The Butterfly of Luxembourg." These articles can be found on hundreds of web searches and throughout the Internet. (text from User:Sail44 moved here)

Aaron Arvey

Hi QEDquid! I'm afraid I had to remove the speedy tag from the above article - as part of the deletion process I checked the history and found that there had been content there, and that it was blanked by someone other than the orginal author. The article still needs deleting, but I don't reckon it's speedyable so I've had to nominate it the long way round at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Arvey - thought I'd let you know in case you wanted to have your say there! Cheers, CLW 10:11, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Irma board

I'll admit to a certain curiosity; why shouldn't the Irma board article be exposed with the IBM PC compatibles category? That category page begins This category, IBM PC compatibles, includes articles having to do with IBM PC compatible computers as well as related hardware and software. While many of the articles do not exclusively pertain to PCs, they are most commonly encountered in that area of computing..

thanks 69.106.234.9 06:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Unido logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Unido logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E.W. Padwick or Eric William Padwick?

I was going by Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people), which includes: General Wikipedia Naming Conventions start from easy principles: the name of an article should be "the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things". This boils down to the two central ideas in Wikipedia article naming:

The name that is most generally recognisable
The name that is unambiguous with the name of other articles

I can't find anything that says that initials must not be used. I think that Padwick's books all had "E.W. Padwick" as the author's name. Later on, I did find: ...if the version with the first and middle names written in full is used nearly as often as the version with abbreviated names followed by a period, prefer the version with these names written in full. But that's not the case here. JH (talk page) 17:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SVG drawing

Sure, no problem at all. Give me a couple of days as I'm out of town right now. — BillC ^talk 14:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How's that? It's no problem making changes, so let me know if there are any adjustments required. Regards, — BillC ^talk 23:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice, only one change - the two source terminals should be those connected directly, so the p-channel FET should have S/D swapped. Thanks!--QEDquid (talk) 21:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now done. — BillC ^talk 04:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of places by name

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of places by name, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places by name. Thank you. GDibyendu (talk) 09:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Charles Wheatstone

Thanks for your time and effort in your edits to Charles Wheatstone (oldid=35660396) back in January 2006.

10:28, 18 January 2006 QEDquid (Talk | contribs) (structured, re-arranged paragraphs, added links)

Unfortunately (you probably didn't realise this) you were re-arranging and changing a large piece of text which a user at 62.211.229.5 had lifted verbatim out of Heroes of the Telegraph by John Munro (from 1891) on 16:44, 7 October 2002 without acknowledging the source. By your changing the wording and order of the paragraphs without paying attention to the meaning of the content you were actually damaging the article by orphaning it from its historical source without correcting the content errors this created, which I'm sure wasn't your intention!

If it was unchanged from the original, it would have been easy enough to mark the whole copied portion as being a quote from that source, but you have changed the wording in a number of places making it your work. Not wanting to destroy the fruits of the effort that you put into it in the first place, I'm writing to respectfully ask if you'd be willing to have another look at the article, and using the Project Gutenberg text as a reference, see if you could perhaps either roll back your changes to the original wording and order and cite the appropriate references, or maybe if you had the time and energy to re-factor the bits that don't make sense.

The first thing I noticed which told me something was wrong with the page was:

"In the Postal Telegraph service this apparatus is employed for sending Press telegrams, and it has recently been so much improved, that messages are now sent from London to Bristol at a speed of 600 words a minute, and even of 400 words a minute between London and Aberdeen."

Which is interesting from a historical context, but nonsense if read as being current information.

As far as I know, we don't have a Postal Telegraph service any longer, and hopefully the bandwidth between London and Aberdeen *after recent improvements* is today somewhat better than 1891's 0.260416667 kbps! ( taking 400wpm to mean 400 x 5 character words = 2000 bytes per minute = 0.260416667 kilobits per second )

For example, that same section in the original text starts with "Wheatstone's next great invention was the automatic transmitter...", which you changed to "Wheatstone further invented the automatic transmitter...", meaning that that section can now not be cited as a quote from the original work - unless it is rolled back first. If it's not rolled back, then it's incorrect, and needs to be re-factored to make sense of its content.

Many thanks & kind regards. JohnGH (talk) 01:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heath H89

Hello. Back in 2006 you created a redirect for Heathkit H89. If you have any interest in the history of these computers, you may want to look at History of personal computers where a discussion of the significance of the Heath machines is ongoing. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of United Nations Federal Credit Union

The article United Nations Federal Credit Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not clear how this orphaned article meets notability guidelines, lacks any references to 3rd party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NetWare Loadable Module

The article NetWare Loadable Module has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"This article does not cite any references or sources." is from Oct 2008, and has not been fixed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RedBlue82 ^talk 10:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: David Walsh (art collector)

I dont have to prove that they dont have permission to post the copyright article from a magazine. The person wishing to include the link DOES have to show that they DO have permission to post the copyright material or that the material is not copyright by the original publisher. Active Banana (^bananaphone 18:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petar Zrinski

Hi, you added a reference using "ibid". Unfortunately, no one can tell which reference it refers to, as both books you cited there are offline. Would you mind updating the citation so that it uses the author's last name? Thank you. howcheng {chat} 00:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Unido logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Unido logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vitozza, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roman, Etruscan and Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burgruine Dürnstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Loebe Julie

Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. QEDquid, thanks for creating Loebe Julie!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page, it looks great. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes,

Anastasia Bykova (talk) 19:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United Nations Industrial Development Organization may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

2012/13-80554_E_Ebook.pdf|title=UNIDO Annual Report 2012|publisher=UNIDO |accessdate=5 July 2013}}</ref>.
The current (2013) Director-General of UNIDO, Mr. [[Li Yong (politician|Li Yong]] (China), was elected by Member States in June 2013.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shtil, di nakht iz oysgeshternt

Song lyrics from 1942 are likely still under copyright, so we can't include them here. Sorry, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, QEDquid. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Priam Corporation

The article Priam Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. No valid references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 00:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Priam Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priam Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priam Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 15:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Campaign for Tibet

The article International Campaign for Tibet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources cited are independent, fails WP:GNG. Initial search didn't pull up in-depth coverage. See talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, QEDquid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of System console for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article System console, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System console until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 8-N-1

The article 8-N-1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP: NOTDICT: I don't see how this article could be expanded beyond it's definition or usage. I made a good-faith effort to find sources that discuss the subject beyond its definition but could not find any.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]