User talk:Pvsamrat

Welcome!

Hello, Pvsamrat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Harlowraman 10:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Gud Job!

U are doing Excellent Work at Wikipedia... Are u a Rajat Fan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankur0412 (talk • contribs) 08:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GNR Page

How about discussing that sort of thing on the article's talk page first? --Mike Searson (talk) 04:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Guns N' Roses (A Musical band) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Amitabh Bachchan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Steve Crossin (talk) 12:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Guns and Roses (TV series). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. faithless (^speak) 10:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tv9.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tv9.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright images

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Maatv.jpg article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.

Also: Image:Mugdha.jpg, Image:Dv.jpg, Image:Raaj.jpg, Image:Ms.jpg, Image:Rjk.jpg SkierRMH (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sobhan Babu

Please do not recreate the extensive lists (over 12000 bytes) of Babu's films and other credits under all his aliases.

They are far too long, cumbersome, unwieldy and make the article look like garbage. You are free to edit as you see fit on Indian Wikipedia as that is where Babu was known and, thus, where his credits will be best appreciated. You can/should also add the link to the IMDb. Yours, 216.194.3.149 (talk) 02:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on improving Babu article. It looks good now!! 216.194.2.245 (talk) 12:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rajat Tokas birthdate

Hi there. Kindly don't keep changing Rajat Tokas' birthdate. He was born on July 19th, 1993 and it has been confirmed by his CBSE Board statistics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankur0412 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pvsamrat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Daggubati Venkateswara Rao - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rajiv Kanakala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Scope for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Scope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Scope until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Secret of success (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amma 3D for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amma 3D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amma 3D until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Scope for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Scope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Scope (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pvsamrat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sagar World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sagar World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar World until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SITH (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zee Smile

The article Zee Smile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain

The article Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angrezi Mein Kehte Hain (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jasuben Jayantilaal Joshi Ki Joint Family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasuben Jayantilaal Joshi Ki Joint Family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasuben Jayantilaal Joshi Ki Joint Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M S Hassan 🤓☝🏻 12:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]