Jump to content

User talk:Purplecart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Purplecart! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dlohcierekim. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Purplecart, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Purplecart! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahan Shetty (October 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 13:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Bkissin for your help

[edit]

Thank you ::@Bkissin: for your help.

Need Help using non free content

[edit]

Hi ::@Dlohcierekim: . Apologies for disturbing you. I wwas wondering if you could help me upload a piece of Non- Free Content something like this Image : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Housefull_2.jpg . I have a source of an article but Im not sure how to upload it. Im trying to use the Upload Wizard but I guess I am not going about it in a correct manner. Could you please help me. (Purplecart (talk) 14:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I don't upload non free images. Only those I take with my own camera.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Dlohcierekim: Thanks for replying. Do you know anybody who would be able to help me. If yes can u direct me to the persons talk page (Purplecart (talk) 13:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rakesh Madhotra (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Catrìona (talk) 04:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Purplecart, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Women's rights have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi ::@Ravensfire: thank you for the Acknowledgement. Indian History and the comparison between Vedic and Post Vedic period and Difference Brought about by certain entities, is something that I feel strongly about. I want to contribute to this area and would like to get in touch with experienced admin who are already working in this area. Can you get me in touch with certain admins. Is that possible.(Purplecart (talk) 09:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Hi ::@Ravensfire: With respect to the Women's rights discussion I have added a single line with two sources to support the argument. I hope they are adequate (Purplecart (talk) 11:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Hi ::@MBlaze Lightning: I understand that I have not paraphrased it according to Wikipedia norms and just copied the headline of the article. However have joined the Wiki Education Dashboard and taking the tutorials there. I will rectified the mistake. Hope my justification makes sense. And thank you for the acknowledgement. (Purplecart (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Hi ::@MBlaze Lightning: I am sorry for disturbing you. I was hoping If you could help me out with wikiedu.org. Will that be possible. If not can you recommend an Instructor who could help me. (Purplecart (talk) 09:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Category:Ranji Trophy Cricketers

[edit]

Hi. Please note that we don't make categories for individual cricket tournaments. I've now nominated this for deletion. Please do not add this to any more articles. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :: @Lugnuts:! Apologies but I did not really understand your statement. What do you exactly mean by "Individual cricket tournaments" isn't every cricket Tournament and Individual and Independent one?? (Purplecart (talk) 08:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. Please see the nomination for more comments. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thanks. I have posted My view. (Purplecart (talk) 09:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

December 2018

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Priyanka Chopra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:12, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ::@Ravensfire:  ::@MBlaze Lightning: ::@Acalamari: I would like to understand the Wiki policies once again. I removed uncyclopedia data from Priyanka Chopra page which stated that her spouse was Nick Jonas . They are not married and the only request I made was that they should wait until there are reliable sources that state that they are married. Was I wrong and If I wasn't. Why is this warning message on my talk page. Hope you people can share some light ::@Ravensfire:  ::@MBlaze Lightning: ::@Acalamari: (Purplecart (talk) 20:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Note that the marriage has not Happened it will happen tomorrow 2nd December Indian standard time. There are more than 24 Hours Left. I believe that ::@Addshore: , ::@Avraham: and ::@Cecropia: you guys are probably the highest authority at Wikipedia. can you please shed light upon the above mentioned. would really appropriate your guidance (Purplecart (talk) 20:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

None of the references in the article currently seem to be that great regarding the wedding date. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/01/entertainment/priyanka-chopra-nick-jonas-married/index.html covers it pretty well though. ·addshore· talk to me! 08:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thnak you @Addshore:! I really needed unbiased opinion. Because the longer the discussion is pushed My arguments become Irrelevant because of the nature of the data being questioned? My Issue was that the marriage date was added and still persists before the marriage actually happened. This kind of favoritism is not healthy. Moreover now Krimuk2.0 has accused me of Sockpuppet. I make an Edit and magically some dispute happens on that page and I get dragged In. I hope I am given a fare discussion. (Purplecart (talk) 09:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Purplecart, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wanna complete my Education. I need this Account Please dont block me.

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Purplecart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Berean Hunter: I do not understand on what grounds have you blocked me I have been accused of being a Sock-puppet with a few more accounts however the only users I have seen before are @UserBlack112: and this Template:Maillokmangal person both of which I suspect are dummy accounts planted to prove me as a sockpuppet. Isn't it very Continent that the moment that I start questioning @Krimuk2.0: edit on Priyanka Chopra page Which was clearly violated by the putting Priyanka Chopra married clearly before she was actually married Which was a PR stunt BY @Krimuk2.0: there are links to the articles they were wanting to make
https://www.republicworld.com/entertainment-news/bollywood-news/heres-how-priyanka-chopra-nick-jonas-wikipedia-pages-look-after-their-nuptials
https://hindi.news18.com/news/entertainment/bollywood-priyanka-chopra-and-nick-jonas-wikipedia-pages-updated-after-wedding-in-jodhpur-1603352.html
https://hindi.latestly.com/entertainment/wikipedia-makes-official-announcement-of-priyanka-chopra-nick-jonas-marriage-84203.html You can check the edits on the pages of Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas Page were absolutely timed in a manner
And then to get me to keep Quite as magically two accounts attempt vandalism on two pages I previously edited of which I did questioned @UserBlack112: for doing so and asked the user to join the talk page instead of resorting to vandalism. Why am I being penalized for this ?? And What is this statement "Using different devices but found together in more than one ISP on same exact IPs, calling it" Give me evidence of the IPs if I have attempted anything . I request a fare trial. This is absolute cyber bullying. Or If there is some internal thing not to speak about this edit tell me and I wont speak about . I am least interested in what is going on her I have adhered to the Wikipedia Norms I may have made some citation errors but otherwise I have never tried malicious. I have recenly signed up with wikiedu.org Im intrested in completing my studies that It . Speak to me at afeemtyagi@gmail.com if any communication required. @Xeno: @Xaosflux: @Worm That Turned: @Wizardman: @Warofdreams: @WJBscribe: @Useight: @UninvitedCompany: @Pakaran:

Decline reason:

I have reviewed the technical data and looked at behavioral evidence because of the possibility that there are numerous users working together here. I agree with Berean Hunter's conclusions. There are multiple accounts on the same IP on different ISPs. I suppose WP:MEAT is also a possibility, though I doubt it personally, but regardless, it is clear the policy on using multiple accounts has been violated. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:08, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Rakesh Madhotra

[edit]

Hello, Purplecart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rakesh Madhotra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 21:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ahan Shetty concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ahan Shetty, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ahan Shetty

[edit]

Hello, Purplecart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ahan Shetty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Purplecart&oldid=1073237161"