User talk:PurpleChez

Welcome!

Hello, PurpleChez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Have A Nice Day 08:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SantaAndPitch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SantaAndPitch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tree That Owns Itself

The article Tree That Owns Itself you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Tree That Owns Itself for eventual comments about the article. Good luck in future nominations. Chrisfow 18:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

animated

Hi, the speed can be changed by editing the gifs in imageready. the only thing I know close to a slideshow are templates, which you can add to the bottom of a series of images and then be able to click to any of them, see commons:Template:USA territorial evolution --Astrokey44 23:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Numalogic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Numalogic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to contact the source of the image to request permission. Until successful I will remove the image from the article for which I uploaded it. PurpleChez 03:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Numalogic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Numalogic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

county maps

okay, i will try to help. what did you want to do exactly? --Astrokey44 13:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a good idea to ask Kmusser, who has made the maps of rivers on List of rivers in Georgia (U.S. state) --Astrokey44 09:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like one of those projects that would be relatively easy with GIS software, but a pain without it, so you may want to take the GIS plunge. There are free ones out there, I've heard good things about http://www.qgis.org/ though I haven't used it. All the data you would need is at http://www.nationalatlas.gov/maplayers.html (boundaries: state and county; map reference: cities and towns; water: streams and waterbodies). The waterfalls themselves you'd probably have to draw in, but that's not hard once you have everything else. If you do I'll be available to answer GIS questions, making maps is so much easier with it, and I'm always happy to help another person become addicted. Kmusser 14:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smile!

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 04:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DoRightCast.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DoRightCast.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gidney&Cloyd2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Gidney&Cloyd2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your thank you

I think you meant to respond to User:Tinmanic, because I didn't do anything to your edits on Hanukkah. Remember 20:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Weather Lady

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Weather Lady, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Weather Lady. Thank you. Michael Greiner 04:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SantaMoviePoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SantaMoviePoster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HereBeMonstersCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:HereBeMonstersCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goof Gas Attack

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Goof Gas Attack, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Banana Formula. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Barberitos.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Barberitos.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tubthumping Silly Drinking Lyrics

Not very surprising though, it's meant to be an amusing reference - they are a UK band, and anarchists in the UK (sorry, couldn't resist) are notorious hard drinkers. Centrepull (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:LightInTheForestFilmPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LightInTheForestFilmPoster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Crimmuh

Possibly unfree File:WilsonPostcard.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WilsonPostcard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 22:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Intro and the Outro

I have nominated The Intro and the Outro, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Intro and the Outro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 12:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Harriot Wilson

May I ask why you moved Elizabeth Harriot Wilson back to the version with parentheses? As a person who needs a better social life, and who spams the Random Button WAY more than can be healthy, I must say I've never seen any page that has the middle name in parenthesis. Unless there's a section in article names that I've missed, shouldn't it be without parenthesis? -WarthogDemon 01:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated on the "discussion" page, 'Harriot' is NOT a middle name. It might best be described as a literary alias. The historical figure was known as simply Elizabeth Wilson, with no middle name as far as I know. (Apparently a common thing at the time...look at all the presidents who didn't have middle names....) Anyhoo...it appears that as her story became increasingly fictionalized she came to be called "Harriot Wilson", and her brother William became "Amos Wilson". Neither Harriot nor Amos are middle names. The need to be set off with parentheses or maybe quotation marks (a la Larry "Bud" Melman) so that they don't look like middle names.

We could check with an admin to be sure, but I'm 99% positive if that's the case, then the title should become something like: Elizabeth Wilson (folklore) and then at the beginning of the article it would read: Elizabeth "Harriot" Wilson". -WarthogDemon 05:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That'd be cool. PurpleChez (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Magicchristmastree.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Magicchristmastree.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Demorest, Georgia

I responded to your talk on Demorest, Georgia and I wanted your opinion. -- RandorXeus. 02:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of backmasked messages. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of backmasked messages. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit fails verification by the only legitimate source you provided. And Wikipedia cannot source itself. Cresix (talk) 00:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I could never fault you for insisting on quality, appropriate citations I thoroughly resent the arrogance of threatening to block me from editing based on a single citation that didn't pass muster. I've replaced the addition to the backmasking list, supported by a citation already used elsewhere in the same list and which also covers No Not Now/Won Ton On. I trust that I'm not gonna get run out of town on a rail for this one.... PurpleChez (talk) 03:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch your tone. The above warnings are standard templates used when there are multiple violations of Wikipedia's sourcing policies. You're not being singled out with a harsher warning than other violators routinely get. And you're right, message boards are not reliable sources, and in any event the specific backmasked messages are not mentioned. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 15:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On edit.... Cresix, please take a look at my questions on the discussion page of the actual article.... PurpleChez (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have Aspergers / What exactly is that like?

Discuss.

68.49.23.251 (talk) 08:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've suspected it at times but professionals have disagreed. Go figure.... PurpleChez (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Diacope, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pump Up the Volume (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul might be dead but my curiosity isn't

Since I made you laugh at Paul is dead, I get to ask a question: What does your wikipedia name mean? It sounds like some funky restaurant or weird wine label or something. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SchematicSavannahSquare.jpg

Would you mind uploading an SVG version of the file "SchematicSavannahSquare.jpg" that is used on the Squares of Savannah, Georgia article? It says you used Illustrator to create it, but it is uploaded as JPG. I could tag it for someone to recreate it as a vector, but since you probably already have it as a vector, I thought it might be easiest for you to do.

Thanks. TWCarlson (talk) 11:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa! It's been a long time, but I'm so OCD that I might still have the original files somewhere. I'll look. Don't hesitate to write back to remind me. PurpleChez (talk) 13:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Zappa wikiproject proposal

Frank Zappa is going to get it's own project section. Go here to join it. We need involvement from as many users as possible so joining would be helpful to Zappa related articles all over Wikipedia. Thank you. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 08:16, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Magic Christmas Tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boone County WV, Notable Residents

Hey- I wanted to talk with you about Jeso White being a notable resident. Jesco, became notable because of a film that prettyy muchy portrays a West Virginian as a meth whore who occasionally goes out for fighting and fucking according to Jesco.....I dont see that as notable....His father, is an accomplished clogger, and does in some ways support a culture, its debateable if he is notable. As to Jesco, and his Notable Stature in Boone County, having been there, and lived in WV, I can assure you, Jesco has a cult following of folks BUT thats NOT notable......Coal town guy (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I respect the fact that you don't see Jesco as a role model, but the list is of notable residents, not necessarily role models. Yes, Jesco and D Ray are well known, in large part, thanks to a documentary that is an unintentional comedy, but the fact remains that they are well known, and arguably more well known that some of the others on the list. PurpleChez (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I hope in some way, that where ever you live, and have watched people grow old, and have buried their family members and have watched their churches grow ragged and have helped deliver their kids, that you too, can feel the pride and joy of having the whole world know about your local drug addicted hell raiser achieving fame and being called notable, while those who helped more people died in total non recognition....Its quite a thrill, and of course, "worthy" of any encyclopediaCoal town guy (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Every town has its share of screw-ups. But some of them are also famous. Fame doesn't change the fact that they're screw-ups, but neither do the screw-ups change the fact that they're famous.... PurpleChez (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the fact that the people who work themselves to death in a coal town, die in total obscurity, are of course compared in the most favorable of light as they are not notable because they did not screw up. I am unable to use that locution. and unwillingCoal town guy (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look...if you want to start a Coal Town Pride website, that would be great. I mean this quite sincerely...I'd be more than happy to head up into the NE PA coal country and bring back tales of the Molly Maguires, and Campbell's handprint on the wall of the jail in Mauch Chunk, and Centralia, and all of that.... PurpleChez (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not at all about pride. It is the uage of facts in a manner that is not encyclopedic. There is NO pride in the 2200 plus articles I have created. They are articles about place names. Ergo, if the community at large believes that Jesco White, is a Notable person in the context of a County History, fine, so be itCoal town guy (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the way it works. The article about Boone County WV doesn't necessarily have to please the residents of Boone County WV--it needs to present facts. PurpleChez (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BUT, it does appear to "work" that way in Harrisburg PA on wikipedia, doesnt it? Which standard do we apply there? The funny thing is, I would not do that here, or anywhere. Well, thanks for letting me know what is and is not notable and how there are different standards for each state here in Wikipedia. No shame, no gainCoal town guy (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What the bloody heck are you even talking about? WHAT works that way "in Harrisburg PA on wikipedia"??? You would not do WHAT here??? I am quite serious...I can't follow half of what you're saying. PurpleChez (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Coal town guy, do you understand the point of Wikipedia? It's about facts, not your foolish opinions. Nobody cares if you think that Jesco White is perpetuating certain stereotypes, that's totally irrelevant. The question is whether or not he is a notable Boone County resident, which he, of course, is. Hey PurpleChez, don't you know that it's pointless to argue with stupid/crazy people? They bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience. Booshmen (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, its a fact. I can become an addict, dance, sing about fighting and fucking and be Notable.....WHILE showing the whole world, what a GREAT place Boone County is.........AND here is the kicker, people who have NEVER been there, get to learn, that the mighty standard of fame in Boone County WV is, get addicted, sing about fighting and fucking, and get filmed while you do it....BRAVOCoal town guy (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone is really hung up about Jesco White's sex life.PurpleChez (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just gotta quote Strong Bad from Homestar Runner: "If you want to make it posessive, it's just 'I-T-S,' but if you want to make a contraction, it's 'I-T-apostrophe-S!' Scalawag!" PurpleChez (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this guys stream of consciousness has been dammed up by beavers. Or else he's inhaled too much coal dust. Ironically, with his incoherent writing and impossible to follow logic about perpetuating stereotypes, Coal town guy has pertetuated far more stereotypes than Jesco White EVER could. Booshmen (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is so cool. Since we were on a County Template talk page, I can report the slander and it cant be deleted, thanks for making this so very easyCoal town guy (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it cant. Yes, I saw the deleted comment about it cant...Neat huh? I wanted to request that you formally cease to be abusive in your language to me. While we do not agree, I agree to disagree, I have to date not personally insulted you.Coal town guy (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's crazy neat. But I'll bet you didn't know that I originally typed that not in reference to the functioning of Wikipedia but in reference to your constant misspelling of the word "can't," which includes an apostrophe for heaven's sake. I deleted it because I thought that was snarky. Neat, huh? PurpleChez (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, at no time have I spoken abusively toward you. I genuinely cannot understand much of what you're saying. PurpleChez (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I genuinely requestedCoal town guy (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

requested what? PurpleChez (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harrisburg and Notable

Hey- Looking up notable things as it were for Harrisburg..Did you know the 2011 rape rate in Harrisburg was 4 times the National Average???? Notable for so may others Also the murder rate was triple the national average..hmmm AND Robberies were over 6 times the national average lots of notable things thereCoal town guy (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just found out that it was voted one of the 20 most dangerous cities in the US..NOTABLE certainlyCoal town guy (talk)

Booshmen was right...you're nuts. I was trying to be a little more diplomatic about it until now, but you're nuts. I am fully aware of all of these unpleasant facts that you're citing, because I read the news every day...the city of Harrisburg has been in decline for longer than I've been alive. But because YOU want to deny or suppress the facts you don't like you assume that I must feel the same way. Guess what--I DON'T!!! I'm not happy that Harrisburg is a criminal hell-hole and a financial basketcase, but I'm not gonna go off on some jihad trying to get other people to retract simple statements of fact. You need a life, or medication, or counseling, or something. PurpleChez (talk) 13:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot Harrisburg's fiscal crisis, all the problems with the incinerator, the broken water mains, the Wild West museum, the sinkholes. Here's a link to an article at NPR: http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/08/31/160379247/inside-americas-most-indebted-city. Feel free to post any of this stuff anywhere. PurpleChez (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I LIVED THERE FOR 3 YEARS,I KNOW IT TOO. Its just IRONIC that these facts are NOT in the Harrisburg wiki article. I think THE WORLD needs to know this. Its a fact, the world needs to know...............JUST LIKE Boone County having a Notable boozer and drug addict on reality TV, being NOTABLE...AND I agree with you. I will not retract the fact AND I will not FORGET to publish the fact either....Coal town guy (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First off...that's not "irony." You not liking something doesn't make it ironic. All of these things that "the world needs to know" are already well-publicized, and some of them are in fact referenced in Harrisburg's wikipedia article. As for those items that aren't included, please feel free to add them. You still seem to be laboring under the delusion that I have the same desire that you have to deny unwanted facts. I don't. Your semi-coherent rage over a simple list is both comical and bizarre. And, for the love of almighty God, when you type a contraction, use the damn apostrophe. PurpleChez (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://sites.google.com/site/ralphspoilsportmotors/home/the-old-dinosaur-park-main-gate/cover-letter

Actually it is irony. One of the poorest counties in the nation gets its hero in the form of a drug addicted dancer and the mighty Harrisburg does not display the fact that its one of the top 20 most dangerous cities in the entire United States.....SO, its either WV is so poor and its stereotypes are so accepted, everyone is all good with this, OK. BUT a glorious state cap, hush hush. The irony is that as money and prestige climb, published negative facts decline. UNLESS you live in WV.......How about a wager? I BET, that I could publish a negative set of facts, real facts about a city in WV, and good ol Harrisburg, will NOT have ANY of the data I have shown above....BUT, If the mighty place called Harrisburg, shows these facts (rape rate, crime rate, violent crime top 20 etc etc etc ), AND I display the negative facts about a city in WV, I will publicly note the wisdom of your way, declare you are the man, and of course beg for forgiveness.....Proviso, the data can't be removed.....EVERCoal town guy (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Are you brain damaged? Seriously--is there a traumatic brain injury at play here? Which part of "I acknowledge that there are all sorts of bad things you could say about Harrisburg and I really don't give a damn if you say them" don't you understand? Or is this some sort of Andy Kaufmann thing? You're doing some sort of performance art, right? You can't really be this ignorant and this stupid. I added Jesco White's name to a list of people from Boone County WV (since he is, after all, from Boone County WV) and you've been sputtering for two days about stereotypes and crumbling buildings and meth whores and songs about fucking (???) and the "fact" of Newt Gingrich's shame at his gay daughter and lives of anonymity and teaching poor children to build websites and crawling through brambles. I've posted links to articles about the sorry state of affairs in Harrisburg and you're still yammering on like you've scored some major "gotcha" by zinging me (for the second time) with the stat about Harrisburg being one of the top 20 most dangerous cities (which I readily acknowledge as valid), and with your creepy, weird sarcasm about "good ol Harrisburg" and "mighty Harrisburg." You said you wrote 2200 wikipedia articles...are they all as much of a linguistic train wreck as your posts here? I mean...seriously...I am struggling to figure out what the heck you're babbling about in your closing "sentence" in the last post (BUT, If the mighty place called Harrisburg, shows these facts (rape rate, crime rate, violent crime top 20 etc etc etc ), AND I display the negative facts about a city in WV, I will publicly note the wisdom of your way, declare you are the man, and of course beg for forgiveness.....Proviso, the data can't be removed.....EVER). I know that a logical discussion is never going to come of this, but I still can't wait to see what logical and grammatical wonderland you conjure up next. And...no, it's NOT irony. You keep using that word...I do not think it means what you think it means. But--hey!--this is wikipedia, so you can look it up here. Hope you didn't miss 4 o'clock med call.... PurpleChez (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I love you man, but as I thought, its OK to lean on WV, but grand great noble Harrisburg.....well, lets not get weepy, here come the water works....Coal town guy (talk) 22:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never said anything about grand great noble Harrisburg. That's all you. PurpleChez (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tröegs Brewing Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GritCookbook.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:GritCookbook.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I've been unable to log into Wikipedia as registered user/editor for months. I have tried all of my usual passwords, and when they haven't worked I've used the "forgot my password" link. A box pops up telling me that an email has been sent to allow me to change my password, but it never actually shows up at my email inbox (or spam folder or anywhere else). I feel like I've picked through the website with a fine toothed comb but haven't found any solutions. I would appreciate if you might be able to assist me in getting logged on once again. Thanks!!

Unfortunately there's no way to recover a forgotten password other than the "forgot my password" email. If that doesn't work you're out of luck and will have to create a new account. Huon (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

popular culture

The AVClub.com often can be used as a source for Family Guy cultural references. If you really want to include it, I would suggest starting there.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The messaging has a new format now, it will let you know when someone has posted on your talk page, and also anytime anyone anywhere does this @PurpleChez:. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cool!PurpleChez (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strange dates

Hey, thanks for the heads up about the confusion about the date when Canute became king. I had missed it myself and I'm grateful that you pointed it out, it was confusing. Best, Yakikaki (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I thought maybe it was given to him before he became king, but I just didn't know.... PurpleChez (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DoRightCast.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DoRightCast.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of U.S. counties bordering eight or more counties for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of U.S. counties bordering eight or more counties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. counties bordering eight or more counties until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PurpleChez. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Para, Ivory Coast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cacao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...the article used the word "cocao"...neither //cocoa// nor //cacao//. I'll go back and see which is more appropriate...fix the disambiguation thing anyway....PurpleChez (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SavannahSquares.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SavannahSquares.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SavannahSquares2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SavannahSquares2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SavannahSquares.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SavannahSquares.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

File:SavannahSquares2.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SavannahSquares.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SavannahSquares.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SavannahSquares.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SavannahSquares.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PurpleChez. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PurpleChez. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Rocky and Bullwinkle story arc

Template:Infobox Rocky and Bullwinkle story arc has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox television episode. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Philadelphia Freedom (song) are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 15:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harrison tree correction

Thought I’d remind you, at Harrison family of Virginia the tree needs to be corrected to show that the elder Thomas Harrison, now shown as the brother of Benjamin II, is the brother of Benjamin I. Thanks. Hoppyh (talk) 15:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank YOU. I appreciate the reminder. PurpleChez (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a temporary fix. The lines indicating relationships are correct, but I still want to tweak it so the generations are all linearPurpleChez (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

completed the fixPurpleChez (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised Peter Mt. Shasta at WP:FTN

You might want to comment there as you were concerned about it. --Doug Weller talk 18:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember anything connected to this, and I don't see anything from me at that link. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks!! PurpleChez (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I musta been stoned, coz on second click everything was clear. Thanks for the message!!! PurpleChez (talk) 19:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Squares of Savannah

I like your file File:SquaresOfSavannah.jpg, but there are two problems. (1) the red text is very hard to read. Can it be made white or yellow? (2) If I click on it to enlarge it, the text disappears. Can this be foxed? Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 00:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can try! Feel free to nag me if nothing changes! Thanks for the kind words. PurpleChez (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wossamotta U

The article Wossamotta U has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Louse on 92nd Street

The article Louse on 92nd Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Weather Lady

The article The Weather Lady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Weather Lady

A tag has been placed on The Weather Lady requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Weather Lady. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bullwinkle's Testimonial Dinner

The article Bullwinkle's Testimonial Dinner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Ruby Yacht

The article The Ruby Yacht has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moosylvania (story arc)

The article Moosylvania (story arc) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pottsylvania Creeper

The article Pottsylvania Creeper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mucho Loma

The article Mucho Loma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bumbling Brothers Circus

The article Bumbling Brothers Circus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moosylvania Saved

The article Moosylvania Saved has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Banana Formula

The article Banana Formula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Weather Lady for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Weather Lady is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Weather Lady (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goof Gas Attack

The article Goof Gas Attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Treasure of Monte Zoom

The article The Treasure of Monte Zoom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Painting Theft

The article Painting Theft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Guns of Abalone

The article The Guns of Abalone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Treasure of Monte Zoom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Treasure of Monte Zoom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Treasure of Monte Zoom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Topsy Turvy World

The article Topsy Turvy World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Missouri Mish Mash

The article Missouri Mish Mash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lazy Jay Ranch

The article Lazy Jay Ranch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Three Moosketeers

The article The Three Moosketeers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wailing Whale

The article Wailing Whale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Last Angry Moose

The article The Last Angry Moose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buried Treasure (story arc)

The article Buried Treasure (story arc) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rue Britannia

The article Rue Britannia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metal-Munching Mice

The article Metal-Munching Mice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greenpernt Oogle

The article Greenpernt Oogle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Box Top Robbery

The article Box Top Robbery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BoxTopRobbery.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BoxTopRobbery.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PeterPeachfuzz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PeterPeachfuzz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of OCMS album 50 Years of Blonde on Blonde.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of OCMS album 50 Years of Blonde on Blonde.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Message On "Mantis" Talk Page

I have sent a new reply on the Mantis Talk Page. Over5help550 (talk) 21:36, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Upsidaisium

The article Upsidaisium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jet Fuel Formula for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jet Fuel Formula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet Fuel Formula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Upsidaisium

A tag has been placed on Upsidaisium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upsidaisium. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RockyBullwinkleGidneyCloyd.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RockyBullwinkleGidneyCloyd.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Savannah Squares

Template:Savannah Squares has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]