User talk:Puntori

If you have something to say beter write me → here

Question

Why did you react so violently on the Albanian Wikipedia when you were warned about Hipi Zhdripi? --PaxEquilibrium 20:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When? Where? Please give me a quote or redirect link. Have nice time. (Puntori 08:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

It took me some time to find it. Here: [1]. --PaxEquilibrium 14:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:PaxEquilibrium I see where your point is. I was not as you sad violently I just sad what I believe and what I don't believe. Reason why I sad that is that in the time of your reaction we as a administration in sq.wikipedia had a problem with one own administrators which was vandal and has wroten propaganda over all administrators which he didn't like.

Let's concentreate to your reaction over the user known as Hipi Zhdripi.

As I see User Dan aka Hipi Zhdripi is not active those two months and I can't say any bad word about him in Albanian wikipedia, my words in his work are just positive. No more comments about this isue.

User Dan in other en, sr. mk. bg. ... wikipedias? I don't administrate in those wikipedias so why are in those wikipedias administrators? Let they (you) do their (your) job if they (you) are competent to.

You sad: Some Serbian Wikipedians have noted that he can't stand Serbs, don't wory about because some Serbians often come in Albanian Wikipedia and delete our articles, so we are nations of war mostly we don't like each other (I don't even like or hate Serbians).

So, thank you for your warning for the second time about our co-administrator (one of the best in sq.Wikipedia) Dan aka hipi Zhdripi.

Sincerely (Puntori 15:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Yeah, yeah; I understand - but that seems bizarre. For was Milosevic a criminal in Serbia and an innocent man in Hungary? --PaxEquilibrium 14:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:) , You think I care? He's dead, I hope (also I hope in Hell). Have nice time. (Puntori 23:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Muhammad pictures

Its look like some Persian Muslims might have made pictures of Muhammad. See Depiction of Muhammad. Wassalam --- ALM 17:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen Fatwa from Shia scholar who is still alive and have a following. He says it is okay to have picture of Muhammad for good reason (not mocking him but for reasons like presenting some event etc.). Obviously, most shia do not follow him and Sunni also. However, there is that view exist. Furthermore, they might be bad and misguided Muslim. Yes they will be. But we cannot say them Kafir (non-Muslim). --- ALM 09:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur! TruthSpreader^reply 11:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with All-llah and Muhammed peace be upon him. He says so I trye to do so,any other way is way of hell.

If we tolerate today a picture (painted by some non muslim subhan All-llah), tomorrow all will make funn of us just like Danish people with cartoons.

Don't forget we will meet each other for those words in judgment day. (Puntori 11:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

As a Dane, and thus a part of the Danish people, I just want to call to your attention, that 12 cartoonists can hardly be seen as representative of Danish people. I hope this is not seen as trolling, I, as a Dane, just don't want to be accused of something I didn't do. --Iafrate 23:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that English wikipedia is full with propaganda and many books written by western are not good about Islam. However, we cannot boycott them until someone is still reading them. We can try to improve them by staying here because if we leave even then some kid with read them and make him mind about Islam. Hence to help that kid you have to work here to improve it because you can improve it. That kid will not read Albanian wikipedia but English wikipedia. English wikipedia is read by many.

One other solution could be that we all Muslim on wikipedia together decide to leave it and work hard to develop Muslimwikipedia for example so that it could be top ranked in google. We can also invite each new Muslim register here to work on muslimwikipedia. My brother we need source in English because many people know it now. --- ALM 11:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think, MuslimWikipedia hasn't become mature enough to feel the problems of multiple POVs. Muslims differ greatly in their interpretation. If you are going to make MuslimWikipedia more scholarly by using scholarly sources, you are going to make some Muslims unhappy, even though the talk might be going in the favour of Muslims. Simplest of the example is of Hijab article. And if you are going to add, let's say tranditionalist Sunni POV, I believe that the whole concept of wiki is gone, because there are so many websites, which are doing the same thing and they don't have bad ranking in Google. So I think, there are so many complexities, once these are solved, we can even attract more people to that website. But this very point, which I just raised, have to be understood by administrators of that wiki. TruthSpreader^reply 11:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As first I will not contribute in en.Wikipedia in Islam and all connected with Islam because I dont know what is true and what not because this what I know (this about Muhammed) that is NOT true, the non muslims ate froceing to SAY just like they whant. (same as about the arabic-muslim history and science)

I am tryeing to be objective, and to work with arguments.

When we talk about Islam regulation and policy sourc should be Qur'an and Muhammed (hadith) no other source. If you are sincer you will not mix Islam regulation and some muslim culture. So hijab should be comented just as it's ordered to be done.(point). If we talk about culture over hijab in Albania , Macedonia (where I come from), Germany, USA, Saudi Arabia we shoud not mix countries between.

Are you scare of Islam? If you are, I'm saying to you DON'T BE SCARE OF ISLAM , if you are not convinced READ - IKRE and you will se that there is no other trouth. Islam is the best life way because I didn't created, GOD did it.

If you are muslim THINK ABOUT if you are not a muslim READ ABOUT.

With all do respect. (Puntori 13:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Kosova

Vëlla shqiptar, kërkoj mbështetjen tuaj rreth seksionit të historisë në artikullin "Kosovo". Materiali i ri që është vendosur aty po sfidohet në mënyrë shoveniste nga qarqe proserbe.--Getoar (talk) 07:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pershendetje,

Te kuptoj per shqetesimin, por ne nuk mund te bejm asgje sepse nuk kemi asnje lloj aksesi per bllokim te ketyre qarqeve. Mendoj se tani per tani duhet t'i lem ujrat te qeteshen pak dhe pastaj informatat e sakta vin ne vend. (Puntori (talk) 08:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Hey you, fucken knucklehead!

I insist on an explanation from you for what reason you have blocked me on Albanian Wikipedia! Phew, I think that I will have to sort you out! -- Whiteroll (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator related templates and categories on your userpage(s)

Hello. I have removed all administrator-related templates and categories from your userpages, as you are not an administrator. Please do not re-add them without good reason. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 02:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, seems to have been a glitch with the script. It was looking for Category:Wikipedia administrators. — neuro^(talk) 17:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Racak was massacre

I have renamed the article to its proper name, which is Račak Massacre. Bosniak (talk) 03:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]