User talk:Puncharoo

Please read my user page first before sending a message, that you. User:Puncharoo 04:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Dora Nichov (talk) 12:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dora Nichov (talk) 11:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dora Nichov (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dora Nichov (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Do not continue to remove the EA animals names and replace them with scientific names in the list, the links are directed to the animals pages that can inform the reader the actual names, and about the way you talk I'm guessing your KL/BRR again because of the way one of his sockpuppets did and he continually vandalises Zoo Tycoon pages here Triceratops9 (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We have already told you to stop vandalizing the pages, stop changing the names of the EA animals and do not add in the animal table for the DD article, it was removed for a reason as it is unencyclopedic. If you continue to vandalize pages you will be banned. Triceratops9 (talk) 12:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We know its you again Komodo Lover, stop vandalizing the pages, you can't do any thing that can't be undone with out one click of the mouse you pathetic excuse for a vandal Triceratops9 (talk) 13:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Triceratops9, do not accuse of sockpuppetry without evidence. If need be you can file a checkuser request, but no unverified accusations please. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have dealt with komodo lover as much as I have then you would recognize that this is the same guy, but fine, I know its him though. Triceratops9 (talk) 17:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

January 25

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Walking with Monsters. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. MelicansMatkin (talk) 16:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 15:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Walking with Monsters. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 14:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing it because I saw some evolutions in that program and heard the ones that were mentioned, somebody added some according thing on it which did not happen in the show. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 15:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be an idiot, speaking like that has nothing to do with typing! I told you once, you go and revert it, your being stupid, there is no reason for you to type like that and I will continue to revert it Triceratops9 (talk)

Spider-Man: Friend or Foe

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Spider-Man: Friend or Foe. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing I said

Moved conversation: Triceratops9 (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to say the "We should name the animals that had names that were given in the game" thing to Prehistoric park but they all reverted it back. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 10:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not edit the Prehistoric Park article, go complain to someone who does. The reason for doing it to the Zoo Tycoon 2 article is because it makes no sense to call them by names they aren't given but there may be a reason for the Prehistoric Park article that I don't know why, go complain to them and don't bring me into your arguments that have nothing to do with me because I am not your mentor or anything like it. Triceratops9 (talk) 12:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ever thought about going to another article and take a break from viewing the ZT pages. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 12:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I had anything to add to them I would, but the only thing I have to do is revert your vandalism to the ZT pages, if I feel I have anything to add to a page then I do, but I don't have much to add to them Triceratops9 (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about you take a break from vandalizing and go check out some pages not related to ZT2 or prehistoric documentaries? Dora Nichov (talk) 12:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 08:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Crash Bandicoot, you will be blocked from editing. Dengero (talk) 09:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just redirecting it to Crash Bandicoot (video game), that's all

Crash Bandicoot (video game) is already redirected to Crash Bandicoot, why go the extra way? And sorry, that warning was too much, I was assuming bad faith. Again, sorry. Dengero (talk) 09:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 09:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Go ahead, keep up with your vandalism to the EA page, all I have to do is click one button to revert it, do you think you can actually keep it there you vandal? No its rather simple to clean up your mess, keep it up, I don't really care, I will simply revert it Triceratops9 (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

is there a way to change you password without logining on. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 10:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have to be logged in to change your password in the preferences. If you can't remember it, you can have it E-mailed to you. King Lopez ^Contribs 11:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

With reference to this edit summary on Walking with Monsters, please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Sturm 12:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's not a personal attack, this is a personal attack:

POW, BOOT, WHAM, CRASH and so on and on. User:Puncharoo Read my page first 19:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's just a sockpuppet screaming his head off. A personal attack is something like calling someone horn face, for example, as you did. Nothing to do with screaming in a silly language. CBFan (talk) 17:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When adding links to material on an external site, as you did to Animal Face-Off, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. --Sturm 20:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User talk:Triceratops9 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 20:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of animals in Prehistoric Park. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Will ^(talk) 20:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Triceratops9. Thedjatclubrock :-) ^(T/C) 20:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block.

I've blocked you for a week, for personal attacks and disruptive editing. If you feel the block was in err, add {{unblock}} to this page. · AndonicO ^Hail! 23:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Indefinitely

Evidence from this accounts contributions and this IP address indicate this is a User:Komodo lover sock. Thus this account is blocked indefinitely.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]