User talk:Ptcloof khan

Ptcloof khan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ptcloof khan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Harshad Arora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 02:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ushna Shah, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ushna Shah was changed by Ptcloof khan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878885 on 2017-06-25T13:32:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rati Pandey. bonadea contributions talk 20:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unsourced and random edits like you did to Sukirti Kandpal, your continuous edits will be taken as Wikipedia:Vandalism and you may be blocked from editing further. 07:50, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spencer^T♦C 17:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sana Javed, you may be blocked from editing. Jevansen (talk) 00:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dil Ka Kia Rung Karun. bonadea contributions talk 06:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 13:42, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

If you continue to evade your block through logged-out edits, the block will be reset or changed to an indefinite duration.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ptcloof khan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Saqib (talk) 19:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)