User talk:Psychonaut25

Your recent edits

Please review your recent edits. They do not improve the quality of the articles and are quite unencyclopedic in style. Please review WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:Manual_of_Style (especially the section on punctuation). If a fellow editor reverts your edits, don't just reinstate them, but discuss them. And please, by any means, avoid edit warring (WP:EW). Regards, SK (talk) 16:55, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When they are reverted, I don't just reinstate them. I either find a better/more grammatically satisfying way to put them, or I discuss them. Always. And yeah, sometimes it is just plain damn hard to accurately state the information in a grammatically satisfying/pleasing and not irritating to read way, although you'll find that a lot of my edits are the result of a very strong conviction I have that in regards to conspiracy type topics where information is dodgy at best, that all existing theories should be discussed and available, since the truth of the matter is simply unverifiable in those cases. In the case of the JFK Assassination page, I simply changed it so that the E. Howard Hunt link is linked to the Conspiracy Claims/Death section of his page, rather than typing out that whole other sentence in parentheses. I hope you are as satisfied with that as I am. I have already, long ago reviewed those pages, it is simply sometimes impossible to state the information accurately whilst using "encyclopedic" language.

Psychonaut25 12:59 PM EST, 26 July 2011

I think the confusion here was simply the result of an edit conflict; by the time I had finished typing what I was going to add (before having saved it...I was still using previews) somebody else had already edited it differently (I presume it was you, although at the time I presumed it was just some other random person who was also editing the same page) so that when I clicked save, it resulted in an edit conflict and didn't save my edits. That's why I went and re-edited them, although I have since discussed all of the edits on the discussion page & we've come to a consensus.

Psychonaut25 10:33 PM EST, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

RE: Reverts

I didn't know you added the ref, I just saw you removed it without explanation. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Please do not "move" pages by cutting and pasting, it unnecessarily fragments the page history, destroys attribution and violates the copyright policy. There is a function, Special:Movepage/EXAMPLE -- which you can access by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Moving a page -- which does what it says on the tin and preserves the page history. MER-C 07:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you. Your help is appreciated.

(Psychonaut25 - 13375p34k / C0n7r1b5 03:53 AM EST, 27 September 2013 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2C-T-17, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cathinone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give PCPr a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Phencyclamine. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 01:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:Hemp Oil Kills Cancer

Template:Hemp Oil Kills Cancer, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Hemp Oil Kills Cancer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Hemp Oil Kills Cancer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to User:Psychonaut25/Template:Hemp Oil Kills Cancer and after some work, added it to your userpage so that it's at least used once. You could consider adding it to Category:Drug user templates or somewhere like that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Psychonaut25. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:Psychedelic psychonaut

Template:Psychedelic psychonaut, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Psychedelic psychonaut and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Psychedelic psychonaut during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I userfied it to User:Psychonaut25/Psychedelic psychonaut ~~and updated your userspace for you~~ and noticed it's hard-coded not transcluded on your userpage so did nothing there. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Psychonaut25. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Psychonaut25. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]