User talk:Prylon

Whatever People Say I Am That's What I'm Not

Regarding the above article. Why exactly did you delete all of this: Many critics and figures in the British Media hyped the Arctic Monkeys and their rapid rise to acclaim through unconventional means^[1]^[2]^[3] and some even cited the Arctic Monkeys as revolutionising the way people find music as they built hype on the basis of a few demos uploaded onto the website Myspace by fans and became an "Internet phenomenon".^[4] NME when it is clearly very relevant as this was how the Arctic Monkeys were being reported in the press as you can see from the references. And also what was with the load of waffle you lifted from the Main article. You could have just left it there. Life is great...if you support Manchester United (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because their 'hype', and particularly the fallacy that Myspace had anything to do with it, is not relevant to the article - it is more relevant on the main article. Also, what's the waffle? Prylon (talk) 16:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Past, Present, Future, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Talk:Past, Present, Future was moved to Talk:Past, Present, Future (Morgana Lefay album) by Prylon (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-01-28T02:02:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johanna Bennett

Just a friendly note on Johanna Bennett. You requested a speedy deletion because the article had been discussed and deleted before. I assume this means you're asking for a G4 speedy, but I don't see evidence of a previous AfD, just a prod. Articles deleted via prod aren't eligible for G4 (and some admins feel they aren't eligible for another prod.) If you think she's not notable, AfD would be your best bet, unless you can point me to the prior AfD. Thanks!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Select April1993.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Select April1993.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Select April1993.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Select April1993.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Fluorescent Adolescent Sample.ogg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fluorescent Adolescent Sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Daily Mirror Pulp.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Daily Mirror Pulp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Desire (band)

A tag has been placed on Desire (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Desire (band)

I have nominated Desire (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desire (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. tedder (talk) 01:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Bloc Party

I'm well aware they are - but you just added a sentence fragment which is poor grammar. Also, try to paraphrase rather than use too many direct quotes. Thanks. GARDEN 16:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote of confidence

Getting on tits is usually a sign I'm doing a good job. I hope to continue doing so in the future. I hope you like it. RB88 (T) 01:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Zomby - Where were u.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Zomby - Where were u.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Alphabet Show

The article The Alphabet Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2015

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2006/jan/13/popandrock.shopping6

[2] ttp://www.musicomh.com/albums/arctic-monkeys_1205.htm

[3] ttp://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/497-whatever-people-say-i-am-thats-what-im-not/

[4] ttp://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2005/oct/25/popandrock.arcticmonkeys

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]